You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Jim Geraghty: "interesting indicators"
2006-11-07
National Review Online

"Obi-Wan" is Mr. Geraghty's code-name for a source in the inner councils of the RNC who (based upon what happened in 2004, anyway) seems to know what he is talking about.

Mid-evening, on November 6, Obi Wan . . . laid out what he thought were some interesting indicators: Three major polls, all showing the generic ballot lead for the Democrats cut in half. His pollster of choice, Andrew Kohut at Pew (formerly with Gallup), wrote a summary of findings that has a fascinating tone:

The narrowing of the Democratic lead raises questions about whether the party will win a large enough share of the popular vote to recapture control of the House of Representatives. The relationship between a party's share of the popular vote and the number of seats it wins is less certain than it once was, in large part because of the increasing prevalence of safe seat redistricting. As a result, forecasting seat gains from national surveys has become more difficult.

The Republicans also have made major gains, in a relatively short time period, among independent voters. Since early this year, the Democratic advantage in the generic House ballot has been built largely on a solid lead among independents.

Moreover, Republicans have gained ground in recent weeks on measures aimed at assessing a voter's likelihood of voting. So while Pew polls in early October and mid-October showed virtually no change in the Democratic advantage between all voters and those most likely to turn out, the current survey shows the Democrats' eight-point lead among all registered voters narrowing considerably among likely voters. In this regard, the current campaign more closely resembles previous midterm elections since 1994, when Republicans also fared better among likely voters than among all registered voters.

Posted by:Mike

#1  I had chalked a lot of the drop in the margin of the generic ballot to a more equal sampling of Democrats and Republicans: whereas they had been strongly skewed toward Democrat respondents in the preceding weeks and months, they was now a much more representative sampling.

However Rove has his internals, and presumably "Obi-Wan" has his, too. It's doubtful they'd have skewed their own sampling. That would be lying to themselves, and that's not going to them any good.

So if they're seeing big shifts internally, something REALLY IS going on. Good to see.

I'll have more to write about after the election, win, lose or draw. But for what its worth, I voted GOP nearly across the board today. (The holdout was a like-minded independent for County Executive.)
Posted by: eLarson   2006-11-07 14:53  

00:00