You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
How Russia Arms Terror
2006-11-04
Mother Russia is also turning out to be the mother of all arms sellers.

The former Cold War superpower, where crusading journalists and anti-corruption bankers are regularly bumped off gangland style and the rule of law has become a joke, has just been designated the leading exporter of arms in 2005 to developing countries by a report issued by the Congressional Research Service, a branch of the US Congress. According to the report, China, India and Iran are RussiaÂ’s best customers for its booming arms industry which took in $1.6 billion more than 2004 to reach $7 billion in sales to developing nations. American arms sales occupied third spot behind second-place France.
Surprise! Surprise! Gollie!
But it is Russia’s supplying of weapons to rogue countries like Iran and Venezuela that is causing friction with America. Sadly, Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose outward democratic façade hides the heart of the former Cold War KGB official that he once was, sees nothing wrong with arming nations that have made no secret of their intent to use them against their neighbors and to destabilize their regions. Russian arms have also been used against American forces and allies, making one wonder with friends like Russia, who needs enemies?
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#4  One of the more common or routine interpretations of Saddam's infamous "MOTHER OF ALL BATTLES" quote on the Net was as "decisive battle" or "battle/war of annihilation" whereupon it was the USA-West whom would be destroyed. However, as myself and others had also warned, Saddam's comment could also be interpreted as the beginning or birth of war(s) or [decisive?]battles for the desired destabilization and hoped-for eventual destruction of the USA-West. GOOD DIALECTICISTS = POWER/MEDIA WHORES = WAFFLELISTS/CRATS > ONE = ANY = ALL = NONE, of the above. The burden is on the USA-West to save and justify both SECULAR SOCIALISM + RADICAL ISLAM, etal -isms, AFORE WE VOLUNTARILY = FORCIBLY ARE MADE = CHOOSE TO SURRENDER TO SAME.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-04 22:36  

#3  if the chechens did nuke russia they wouldn't give a sbhit unless someone big got it. What I mean is loom at some of the stuff the chechens have pulled off in the last few years and mother russia still can't save themself , and can't figure out that all the arms that the chechens use are usually mad ein russia or an ex soviet state
Posted by: Glomoger Angavitle2117   2006-11-04 19:54  

#2  Imagine the Russians succeed in arming Iran with nukes. Now imagine the Chechyens getting their hands on one from the Iranians. Sit back and enjoy the show.
Posted by: Perfesser   2006-11-04 12:46  

#1  Russkies are just as ruthless at capitalism as any American corporation. What I believe is really worrisome is that they have probably already sold functional nukes to these Arabs. They could demand any price they want, into billions. The camel drivers have the cash and would gladly pay up. I think this clamor over nuclear power is nothing but cover for Russkies(and another money maker, as Russkies sell the power plants). The fact that you have the ingredents doesn't mean you can make a functional bomb. If you have a Russian bomb, you have a winner. But Russians want their cover protected.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-11-04 11:21  

00:00