| Submit your comments on this article |
| Afghanistan |
| British pull out of southern Afghan district |
| 2006-10-19 |
| OPERATIONAL SUCCESS: The leader of NATO forces in Afghanistan said the pullout reflected military progress but that forces would return if the situation demands it British troops have pulled out of a troubled southern Afghanistan district after reaching an agreement with tribal elders, while fighting killed 44 suspected Taliban militants across the country, officials said. Think: Southern Iraq. Warlords, Militia, same-same. NATO, meanwhile, said that it is launching a new countrywide operation with Afghan forces to keep pressure on the Taliban through the fall and winter after the worst fighting in five years. Or you could say after killing the mostest in the shortest. Mark Laity, a NATO spokesman in Kabul, said on Tuesday the decision to withdraw British troops from Helmand Province's Musa Qala district follows an agreement with tribal elders and the provincial governor, and was supported by President Hamid Karzai. "There has not been any contact with the Taliban, and they are not involved in this," Laity said. We know them when we see them. And we search them for Taliban ID cards, just to be sure. He said the troops would leave Afghan security forces in charge. Musa Qala has been one of the most volatile regions of Helmand Province, where about 4,000 British troops deployed in the spring have met stiffer-than-expected resistance from resurgent Taliban militants. But everything's spiffy, now. We have a deal. We know how to do these things, um, better. General David Richards, commander of the 32,000-strong NATO-led force in Afghanistan, said the redeployment reflects the operation's success. But "we will continue to go back into Musa Qala if the security situation demands it," Richards said. Like next week? At a news conference in London on Tuesday, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said the Iraq and Afghanistan missions were important to British and global security. True enough, Tony. "If we walk away before the job is done from either of those two countries, we will leave a situation in which the very people that we're fighting everywhere, including in extremism in our own country, are heartened and emboldened and we can't afford that to happen," he said. I think he gets it. Elsewhere in Afghanistan, heavy fighting continued on Tuesday. Lack of Soft Power, methinks. Richards will fix that. A coalition airstrike killed a suspected midlevel Taliban commander and up to 15 other militants in southern Uruzgan Province. Crude. Cowboyish. A NATO statement on the strike did not name the suspected Taliban commander. Afghan army forces battled insurgents near the eastern border with Pakistan in a clash that killed 24 suspected militants and a soldier, said Defense Ministry spokesman General Mohammed Zair Azimi. It was not immediately possible to independently confirm the toll. In Helmand's Garmser district, police killed four suspected Taliban and arrested six others, said Ghulam Muhiddin, the provincial governor's spokesman. In neighboring Kandahar Province, suspected Taliban destroyed an oil tanker transporting fuel for NATO-led forces and killed its driver, said a police official, General Abdul Raziq. Oops, not enough Soft Power there. A rocket hit a house during a nighttime clash between suspected Taliban insurgents and NATO and Afghan security forces in a southern Afghan village, causing civilian casualties, police said yesterday. But the locals said it was a bomb. Rocket - Talibunny, bury the dead. Bomb - NATO, collect compensation. One Taliban was also killed and three police wounded in fighting in Helmand Province on Tuesday. Think Southern Iraq. Big Success. |
| Posted by:.com |
| #8 Good point Ebbang. But be careful about asking such questions here. |
| Posted by: Rafael 2006-10-19 16:43 |
| #7 On the other hand, what is the point if you can't go after the source in Pakiland? |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2006-10-19 15:26 |
| #6 But "we will continue to go back into Musa Qala if the security situation demands it," Richards said. General Patton on 'tactical withdrawals': "I don't like paying for the same real estate twice." |
| Posted by: GK 2006-10-19 14:58 |
| #5 Was the purpose of turning Afghanistan duty over to NATO to show how decrepit the organization has become with the current Euro governments' preference for militaries that are for decoration and parades only? The soldiers are still OK but the commanders are dubious at best. |
| Posted by: RWV 2006-10-19 10:51 |
| #4 On the other hand, root em out, kill a few, and pull out. They file back in. Repeat cycle. Repeat cycle, repeat cycle. War of attrition. |
| Posted by: wxjames 2006-10-19 10:19 |
| #3 I suppose Dunkirk was an early example of turning WWII over to local French Elders? We should remember this stellar British performance when Argentina re-invades the Falklands... some time next year. |
| Posted by: Slolulet Pheamble9987 2006-10-19 06:45 |
| #2 Howard - c'mon over, bro. Whatever it is that floats your boat - you can find here, methinks. ;-) |
| Posted by: .com 2006-10-19 03:41 |
| #1 Dobtless we'll be back when fighting season 2007 commences. Sigh.. |
| Posted by: Howard UK 2006-10-19 03:29 |