You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Editorial: North Korea's 'Deterrent'
2006-10-11
IT was President George W. Bush who pushed the diplomatic button that yesterday triggered North Korea’s first nuclear weapon. He did it on March 20, 2003 when the first US cruise missiles smashed into Baghdad. He had prepared even earlier in January 2002 when in his State of the Union Address he called North Korea, Iran and Saddam’s Iraq the “The Axis of Evil”.

At the time, North Korea protested the Bush’s assertion was little short of a declaration of war. Pyongyang withdrew from tortuous negotiations to abandon its nuclear-weapons program in return for aid and restarted its Yongbyon reactor. It is now clear that from this date it raised a series of diplomatic smokescreens during on-off negotiations within the “Six Nation” forum with China, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. In January 2003, when it had become patently clear that Washington was poised to invade Iraq, North Korea withdrew from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Since then it has tested missiles and announced that it had six nuclear devices. At each revelation, the rest of the world, with Washington in the lead, has huffed and puffed. China, Pyongyang’s only real ally and supplier of much of its energy and essential foodstuffs, has preferred to use gentle persuasion. In the event neither strategy has worked. The North Korean leadership has exploited international differences and Washington’s entrapment in the diplomatic and military mire of Iraq.

In its terse announcement of the successful test, the North Korean news agency asserted, “It will contribute to defending the peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and in the area around it.” It is hard not to disagree with this. If the international community was unable to intervene decisively while Pyongyang’s scientists were hurrying to make their bomb, how much harder will intervention be now? It matters not that this explosion was equivalent to only 800 tons of TNT when one of the bombs the Americans dropped on Japan in 1945 represented the force of 15,000 tons of the explosive. North Korea has joined the nuclear club and the very unpredictability of its Stalinist regime makes its bomb that much more powerful.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Uh, so what was their excuse for trying to build one in the '90s? The naked aggression of Bill Clinton?

That doesn't count.

And do not mock The Cigar-Wielding Holy Teflon One or we will pull even further to the left and really start seething!

P.S.: Which way is the moon? My radar hasn't been working very well the last couple of decades or so.
Posted by: moonbat   2006-10-11 22:50  

#4  sounds like DNC talking points

Heh. How exactly does one tell the difference between DNC talking points and the rantings of muslim madmen?
Posted by: SteveS   2006-10-11 12:59  

#3  Yes, the US, UK and France have "Deterrent" arsenals. But we don't give press reports threatening to put them on missiles and shoot them at people. We don't break deals and crawfish reactors, and we don't starve millions(not an exageration) of people to death to pay for it all.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-10-11 08:06  

#2  Arabnews, huh? sounds like DNC talking points
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-11 00:31  

#1  Uh, so what was their excuse for trying to build one in the '90s? The naked aggression of Bill Clinton? (Thank you! I'll be here all week!)
Posted by: Jonathan   2006-10-11 00:17  

00:00