You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Salman Rushdie says Muslim veils 'suck'
2006-10-10
Who says modern writers aren't 'eloquent'?

The row over Muslim women's dress codes reignited today after author Salman Rushdie declared that "veils suck".

Rushdie, whose book The Satanic Verses triggered death threats from Islamic clerics, gave his full backing to Leader of the Commons Jack Straw for raising the issue.

Rushdie was forced into hiding for 10 years after Iranian cleric Ayatollah Khomeini served a "fatwah" on him over his book's alleged slight on the prophet Mohammed.

He had round-the-clock police protection costing nearly £1 million a year, although that has been downgraded in recent years after Iran indicated the death sentence no longer applied.

But Rushdie has always insisted he was right to publish The Satanic Verses and today he risked fresh Muslim anger with a savage attack on the wearing of veils.

In an interview with BBC Radio 4's Today programme, held to mark the opening of a new joint exhibition with sculptor Amish Kapoor, he backed Mr Straw to the hilt.

"Speaking as somebody with three sisters and a very largely female Muslim family, there's not a single woman I know in my family or in their friends who would have accepted wearing the veil.

"I think the battle against the veil has been a long and continuing battle against the limitation of women, so in that sense I'm completely on [Straw's] side.

"He was expressing an important opinion, which is that veils suck, which they do. I think the veil is a way of taking power away from women."

Mr Straw triggered anger last week when he revealed he asked Muslim women visiting his constituency surgery to remove their veils.

He said that seeing someone's face made it easier to communicate and felt the garment was a barrier to integration and good community relations.

The publication of the Satanic Verses in 1989 triggered not just the fatwah from Iran but also riots in Pakistan, India and Turkey among Muslims who felt he had insulted the prophet.

In the following decade, the book's Japanese translator was murdered and its Norwegian publisher and Italian translator seriously injured in separate attacks.

Publisher Penguin received 5,000 abusive or threatening letters and 25 bomb threats.

Rushdie is to open a joint exhibition with Kapoor at a London gallery, with a sculpture based on the story of Sheherazade, the Arabian woman who told stories to avoid a brutal death at the hands of a tyrant.

Kapoor said today that he disagreed with Rushdie over the veils issue.

He agreed, he said, with John Prescott, who said that he would find it rude to tell someone wearing sunglasses to remove them.
Posted by:mcsegeek1

#10  The reason why muslim women wear the veil...toilet duty.
Posted by: tipper   2006-10-10 23:28  

#9  As a longtime wearer of sunglasses I am offended by these remarks. You are racists, and I demand an apology. Furthermore I demand an apology for headlice, the high price of gas, sunspots, various other natural phenomenon, herpes, violence in the crusades and the fact that there are poor people.
Yours Truly,
Liberal Asshole
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-10-10 17:57  

#8  I wear sunglasses outside because of cataract surgery that has left me even more light-sensitive than I was before. I try my best to remember to take them off when I come indoors. There's a medical reason I wear them. There is no sensible reason to wear a veil - or even a burqa - except to put women into a subservient place. Jack Straw needs to keep hammering these points home. If muslims want to live in the UK, they need to adopt more closely to UK dress and behavior and stop trying to create exclusive "islamic" enclaves. That, in my opinion, is an act of war.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-10-10 15:36  

#7  He should address the issue of the mozzie taxis in England refusing to carry the blind because of his indispenable guide mutt. That's much more than just "rude". That's a shameful illogic that John Prescott pretends not to see or understand in his headlong mollycoddling of 'em "sensitivities". Hogwash.
Posted by: Duh!   2006-10-10 13:10  

#6  It is rude to wear sunglasses when conversing, unless the physical situation (facing into bright sun, blindness) requires it. The eyes and the face communicate as much as the words coming from the mouth, and to refuse to share that is to set oneself above the person with whom one is speaking. After all, the reason musicians wear sunglasses in dark, smokey venues is so that nobody can see what they're looking at, or that they are not exactly sober, or that they despise the suckers paying good money for what they're dishing out.

So whether or not Mr. Rushdie would so say, I most certainly do, Planet Dan.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-10-10 12:54  

#5  Rusdie is now going to be a visiting Professor (of English/Lit, I believe) at Emory University here in Atlanta. I, for one, wholly welcome him to come visit and speak here, even if it's one of the most moonbat-infested universities in the southeast.
Posted by: BA   2006-10-10 12:42  

#4  I think it's rude to say "death to america"
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087   2006-10-10 11:54  

#3  he would find it rude to tell someone wearing sunglasses to remove them.

but would he find it rude to hear someone saying, in general, that he is against the wearing of sunglasses indoors or when having a conversation with someone whom you are trying to get to know, even outdoors?

don't think so.
Posted by: PlanetDan   2006-10-10 11:18  

#2  I think most of the West is coming to the conclusion that the Muzzies will be pissed at anything and we of the West think the Muzzies can just go fuck themselves.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-10-10 10:25  

#1  he would find it rude to tell someone wearing sunglasses to remove them

Not indoors he wouldn't. In winter. At night.

Or in a job interview.
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-10-10 10:19  

00:00