You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa Horn
Sudan warns against supplying troops for Darfur
2006-10-07
SUDAN stepped up opposition to a United Nations peacekeeping mission for Darfur, warning that it would consider any country's pledge to supply police or troops to a UN force "a hostile act" and a "prelude to an invasion".

...warning that it would consider any country's pledge to supply police or troops to a UN force "a hostile act" and a "prelude to an invasion".
The Sudanese statement follows a letter from the UN urging scores of governments to commit troops to a Darfur mission. Khartoum reiterated its "total rejection" of an August 31 Security Council resolution which approved a UN force of about 20,000 with the authority to use "all necessary means" to help restore calm in Darfur .

“'They are trying to intimidate troop-contributing countries,' the US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, said.”
In response to the Sudanese statement, the US convened an emergency session of the Security Council on Thursday, accusing Sudan of defying the will of the 15-nation body. "They are trying to intimidate troop-contributing countries," the US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, said. "Obviously, if no one volunteers to contribute forces to the Darfur mission [there won't be one], regardless of what Security Council does."

Mr Bolton tried to rally council support for a statement deploring Sudan's attempt at intimidation as the Bush Administration moved to increase international pressure on Sudan to allow UN peacekeepers into Darfur. The US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, on a tour of the Middle East, also urged Arab leaders to persuade Khartoum to let the UN intervene in the violence in Darfur. President George Bush's special envoy for Sudan, Andrew Natsios, met the UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, on Thursday.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Another "Iran" case where blowing away all of the various forms of competing leadership cannot have any possible downside.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-10-07 23:48  

#6  Bony parts - that would be the majority, some would say... Available on eBay, I presume, Mr Ship?
Posted by: .com   2006-10-07 21:10  

#5  Mr .com if you're going to watch TeeVee news and Read Rantburg you gotta have a Haghn Device, this slows the brain velocity towards the bony parts of em hed skull. Recommended. Also impressers the wymn when you dons your safety measure.
Posted by: Shipman   2006-10-07 17:25  

#4  Let's not send troops, let's send aid! Air-deliver several thousand bags of wet cement over Khartoum, especially the government sector. Drop another $80,000 in aid money (all pennies) over the same city from a B-52 at 45,000 feet. After all, we really do need to help these unfortunate people out of their misery, don't we?
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-10-07 14:40  

#3  Khartoum needs a JDAM wakeup just for being belligerent 3rd world Arab tin-pot dictators. Call it delayed reaction for hosting Bin Laden in the 90's or the Darfur genocide pre-war bombing, whatever. I just get tired of loudmouths who can't back it up.
Posted by: Frank G   2006-10-07 09:09  

#2  Lol, SH.

There's a commercial running on local TV which says that only a "strong UN force" can stop the slaughter in Darfur. Then, in a masterful example of total cognitive dissonance, it demands President Bush act immediately. Since I'm an RBer, it gives me major whiplash, but I doubt that Joe Avg even notices. OWG.
Posted by: .com   2006-10-07 02:45  

#1  I recommend that we send some troops because contibuting manpower to a UN Peacekeeping Force will fulfill my deep desire to invade a country of starving people that hate each other.
Posted by: Super Hose   2006-10-07 01:23  

00:00