You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
What JDAM Hath Wrought
2006-09-29
September 28, 2006: Military commanders the world over are struggling to figure out how to deal with the massive changes created by the arrival of GPS guided bombs (like JDAM). The United States has them, most of them, and the ability to stop others from using them (because America control the GPS satellites). The impact of JDAM has been enormous. It has made air power much more effective, reduced casualties for the force using them, and speeded up combat operations. Few non-professionals have noticed this, but generals and admirals of the major military powers have. These changes are enormous, but the mass media has not really noticed what is going on here. So few people are aware of how much JDAM has changed the way wars are fought.

The appearance, and impact, of JDAM has been sudden. While guided bombs first appeared towards the end of World War II, they did not really become a factor until laser guided bombs were developed in the 1960s. A decade later, TV guided bombs came into service. But these guided bombs were expensive, costing over $100,000 per bomb. Even as late as the 1991 Gulf war, only 16 percent of the 250,000 bombs dropped were guided. Analysis of the battlefield later revealed that the guided bombs had done 75 percent of the actual damage. But the guided bombs were still too expensive, and lasers were blocked by many weather conditions (rain, mist, sand storms). Something new was needed to replace dumb bombs completely. The solution was GPS guided bombs.

In 1991, the GPS system was just coming into service. There were already plans for something like JDAM, but no one was sure that it would work. Once the engineers got onto it, it was discovered that JDAM not only worked, but cost less than half as much to build ($18,000 per bomb) as the air force expected ($40,000 a bomb).

So in 1996, production of JDAM began. The bombs got their first workout in the 1999 Kosovo campaign. To everyone's surprise, 98 percent of the 652 JDAMs used, hit their targets. In 2001, JDAM proved the ideal weapon for supporting the few hundred Special Forces and CIA personnel the U.S. had on the ground in Afghanistan. The JDAM was more accurate, and effective, than anticipated. By January, 2002, the U.S. had dropped about half their inventory, of 10,000 JDAMs, in Afghanistan.

In 2003, 6,500 JDAM were used in the three week 2003 Iraq invasion. Since 1999, American aircraft have used about 20,000. New versions have added more capabilities. The latest versions are even more accurate, putting half the bombs within ten meters of the aiming point. A new 250 pound version is entering service this year. Another new version, with wings, is on the way, which will enable a bomber to drop the bomb up to 100 kilometers from the target. JDAMs are pretty rugged. F-22s have dropped half ton JDAMs, from 50,000 feet, while flying at over 1,500 kilometers an hour.

Even American war planners are not completely sure what the overall impact of JDAM is going to be. That's because the army has introduced GPS guided rockets and artillery shells as well. Sorting out all the impacts on military operations is complicated by what the enemy will do. So far, JDAM has only been used against tribal warriors and urban guerillas. These foes have been resourceful, but have not been able to do much to degrade the impact of JDAM. Against professional troops, that might be different, but no one is sure yet. And that has generals in places like China, Iran and North Korea worried. The U.S. is currently producing 3,000 JDAM a month, and is planning to build an inventory of about 200,000. China, Russia and the European Union are building their own GPS systems which, among other things, will enable them to build JDAM type bombs that the U.S. cannot shut down. Even then, using satellite guided bombs against U.S. forces will still be complicated by the need to get your aircraft into the air. No enemy air force has been able to do that for over half a century. So, for the moment, JDAM is an American advantage, and enormous one at that, and one that has changed the way wars are fought in more ways than most people realize.

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#17  One of the beauties of ARCLIGHT strikes in Vietnam is that the enemy didn't know they were targeted until the bombs were over halfway to the ground. Believe me, the noise on the ground is deafening, even as far away as 10-15 miles. Precision is good to hit vital C3I and logistical targets, but nothing does more damage to troops on the ground than large numbers of dumb bombs exploding at almost the same time. It's kind of like a heavy, rolling artillery barrage, but from 50,000 feet. Precision is good, but scaring the sh$$ out of the enemy while killing half or more of them is even better.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-09-29 21:57  

#16  Most urban zones worldwide have at best one week's supply of food, counting all fresh, canned, and dried foodstuffs on hand. All major urban zones worldwide relying on electricity to light the night, pump water and sewage, cool and freeze food, and provide working hospitals. JDAMs on the water, sewer, and electrical infrastructure of a major urban zone would result in a Lord of the Flies scenario in much of it in under a month. When someone is starving, dying of thirst, and freezing to death, they tend to become very unmanagable for the local government. They also tend to fight with sticks, bottles, rocks, and swarming mass attacks against those authorities that prevent them from getting to life's essentials. Anyone view Mogadishu as a vacation spot? It is a prime example of what happens when you gut all essential services.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-09-29 16:48  

#15  Even as late as the 1991 Gulf war, only 16 percent of the 250,000 bombs dropped were guided. Analysis of the battlefield later revealed that the guided bombs had done 75 percent of the actual damage.

SOLD!

And that has generals in places like China, Iran and North Korea worried.

SOLD!

No, precision weapons aren't everything, but they save money, keep our troops and pilots out of harm's way and make the enemy just that much more fearful. Combine all of the above with some real suffering on the ground and you have an unbeatable combination.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-29 15:27  

#14  "The God of JDAM reached out and touched me. Purdy damn hard, too."

LOL, .com.

"When planners strive to make warfare antiseptic to the general populace, they defeat their own purposes"

How true.

"We are not only fighting hostile armies, but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war. We cannot change the hearts of those people, but we can make war so terrible Â… [and] make them so sick of war that generations will pass away before they again appeal to it."

---William Tecumseh Sherman
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-09-29 14:01  

#13  Next Gen: Seeth Seeking Missiles
Posted by: Hyper   2006-09-29 13:28  

#12  Strategic bombing? What's that? It is now just a matter of target definition. Will anybody ever be dumb enough to give us an opportunity to carpet bomb with dumb bombs again? And if they did, would we do that or saturation PGM? How many SDBs could a single B-1 carry and what area would it cover?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-09-29 12:56  

#11  Let us not worship at the alter of precision weapons.

Too late. The God of JDAM reached out and touched me. Purdy damn hard, too.
-Zarqi
Posted by: .com   2006-09-29 12:53  

#10  I think the greatest asset this provides is the ability to have VERY close in support given to ground troops.

There is still the need for Strategic bombing in certain scenarios, I agree, but close-in air support is a very lethal and effective tool for our Infantry.
Posted by: Anon4021   2006-09-29 12:38  

#9  German and Japanese casualty rates were in the single digits (as percentage 6-8% iirc) Sherman had extremely low casulties amongst the populace. I think it's fair to say that for really big civilian dislocation you have WWII and the Thirty Years War.

I'd disagree with SOP and Rob. I'd be willing to bet that any country we'd be dealing with is more urbanized than the Germans or Japanese were in WWII. If we precision bomb to devastate war related infrastructure but do not invade or occupy, I believe the ensuing civil disorder would do far more to devastate a culture than did the WWII bombing, Sherman's Marches or an atomic attack. We'd be talking Thirty Years War level of dislocation. Think about it. No roads, no ports and no electricity. How ya going to pump the water? What happens in an urban area when there's no potable water or sewage treatment? No way to refrigerate food? No fuel for transportation. No way to conduct commerce?

Leave 'em like that until you get unconditional surrender. If they decide to go guerilla, withdraw. I really think people will do worse to themselves than we would ever do to them if simply left to stew in primitive conditions.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-09-29 12:25  

#8  SOP35/Rat
It is VERY necessary that the populace experiences pain and anguish so they force the fools among them to cease and desist their outrageous actions.

I couldn't agree more with this statement. For real victory, there is no substitute for substantialy reducing the number of your enemy (30% or more).
Any historians out there care to weigh in on the efficacy of peace following victory where adversary cultures (civilian and military) were culled by 30%? How about peace after conflict with a smaller perecentage reduction in population?
Posted by: Rob06   2006-09-29 11:30  

#7  But Daisy Cutters make better clouds.
Posted by: macofromoc   2006-09-29 11:26  

#6  Let us not worship at the alter of precision weapons. They are wonderful for taking out key targets, like bridges, commo centers, eletrical generation stations , etc. Wide area bombing is just as crucial. When planners strive to make warfare antiseptic to the general populace, they defeat their own purposes. It is VERY necessary that the populace experiences pain and anguish so they force the fools among them to cease and desist their outrageous actions.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-09-29 11:21  

#5  hopefully we have our own laser that shoots their sats
Posted by: sinse   2006-09-29 10:09  

#4  We are testing our satellites by having them shoot lasers at Chinese.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-09-29 09:50  

#3  I wonder if we're testing our satellites by shooting at their lasers? Who would know?
Posted by: Snavick Thravilet5335   2006-09-29 09:42  

#2  Hence the Chinese shooting at US satellites to test their laser.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2006-09-29 09:11  

#1  That's because the army has introduced GPS guided rockets and artillery shells as well.

There's a cable show called "Futureweapons" that showed a test of the GPS guided artillery. They fired the shells 30 degrees off-axis, and still hit the target.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-09-29 08:50  

00:00