You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
AFTER THE NEOCONS (Book review)
2006-09-25
Posted by:tipper

#5  Tipper, dead nuts on.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-09-25 15:50  

#4  Me, I come from the "Kill them all"
Allah will sort out the good ones."
I remember reading about the day after Baghdad collapsed that a young soldier was sent onto the University of Baghdad campus, unarmed.
Somebody walked up to him and blew his brains out. My anger was white hot rage, not at the person who shot him, but at the moron who sent him on a suicide mission, in all innocence. I still hod that rage to this day, but I keep it muffled. After all , we are all supposed to be on the same side.
All warfare tells us you win by using the concept of "divide and conquer" If the COWs had just stood back and forgot about bringing "democracy" to an unwilling populace, and let them sort their own grieviences out, and not tried to micromanage the whole process, I'm sure the war would be over by now.
As H. Truman said ""When you have to deal with a beast you have to treat him as a beast. It is most regrettable but nevertheless true."
I believe, with the reviewer, that what Fukuyama offers "His book is sharp and shrewd, although ultimately not so devastating as he believes. The alternative he offers, by contrast, so-called realistic Wilsonianism, merely prefers ineffectual internationalism. Alas, in these difficult times, this is no alternative at all."
Posted by: tipper   2006-09-25 13:41  

#3  Double secret opposition, no doubt.
Posted by: Spot   2006-09-25 09:02  

#2  Charles Krauthammer:

It was, as the hero tells it, his Road to Damascus moment. There he is, in a hall of 1,500 people he has long considered to be his allies, hearing the speaker treat the Iraq war, nearing the end of its first year, as "a virtually unqualified success." He gasps as the audience enthusiastically applauds. Aghast to discover himself in a sea of comrades so deluded by ideology as to have lost touch with reality, he decides he can no longer be one of them.

And thus did Francis Fukuyama become the world's most celebrated ex-neoconservative . . .

I happen to know something about this story, as I was the speaker whose 2004 Irving Kristol lecture to the American Enterprise Institute Fukuyama has now brought to prominence. I can therefore testify that Fukuyama's claim that I attributed "virtually unqualified success" to the war is a fabrication.

A convenient fabrication -- it gives him a foil and the story drama -- but a foolish one because it can be checked. . . .

Fukuyama now says that he had secretly opposed the Iraq war before it was launched. An unusual and convenient reticence, notes Irwin Stelzer, editor of "The Neocon Reader," for such an inveterate pamphleteer, letter writer and essayist. After public opinion had turned against the war, Fukuyama then courageously came out against it. He has every right to change his mind at his convenience. He has no right to change what I said.
Posted by: Mike   2006-09-25 06:35  

#1  This is the moron that wrote history was over. All you need to do to get a book deal with massive promotion these days is froth at the mouth over Bush, Neocons and the Iraq war. Another piece of garbage for the dustbins of history.
Posted by: Flavitle Omart7450   2006-09-25 03:55  

00:00