You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US Holds AP Sunni Iraqi (not PC) Photographer
2006-09-18
The U.S. military in Iraq has imprisoned an Associated Press photographer for five months, accusing him of being a security threat but never filing charges or permitting a public hearing.

Military officials said Bilal Hussein, an Iraqi citizen, was being held for "imperative reasons of security" under United Nations resolutions. AP executives said the news cooperative's review of Hussein's work did not find anything to indicate inappropriate contact with insurgents, and any evidence against him should be brought to the Iraqi criminal justice system.
Be careful what you ask for.
Hussein, 35, is a native of Fallujah who began work for the AP in September 2004. He photographed events in Fallujah and Ramadi until he was detained on April 12 of this year. "We want the rule of law to prevail. He either needs to be charged or released. Indefinite detention is not acceptable," said Tom Curley, AP's president and chief executive officer. "We've come to the conclusion that this is unacceptable under Iraqi law, or Geneva Conventions, or any military procedure."

Hussein is one of an estimated 14,000 people detained by the U.S. military worldwide — 13,000 of them in Iraq. They are held in limbo where few are ever charged with a specific crime or given a chance before any court or tribunal to argue for their freedom.
But they're off the battlefield. Like the Gitmo commander said the other day, they're not 'imprisoned' for punishment or rehabilitation, they are detained to save American lives.
Posted by:Bobby

#5  "Journalists have always had relationships with people that others might find unsavory," she said.

Hands up everyone who remembers when it was decided that the CIA cannot associate with "people that others might find unsavory".

Now, shouldn't our freaking intelligence service have wider lattitude in dealing with criminals and our enemies than the freaking press? Shouldn't the press be held account for what amounts to their funding terrorists and propagating enemy, um, propaganda?

Shouldn't any AP execs who authorized the continuing employment of "stringers" like Belial be investigated for treason?
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-09-18 12:15  

#4  The U.S. military in Iraq has imprisoned an Associated Press photographer for five months, accusing him of being a security threat but never filing charges or permitting a public hearing

I believe SCOTUS said they can be kept till the war is over. No hearing necessary. Caught on the battlefield with a weapons cache, tough tiddly wats. New Bulletin - Flashing a Press Card is not a 'Get Out of Jail Free' card. You are not special people. Get over yourselves. So when was the last article you ran on SPC Matt Maupin? We'll show as much concern for your boy.
Posted by: Phineque Cleang4302   2006-09-18 11:46  

#3  Some goodies when Bilal was arrested:

Michelle Malkin: WHERE IS BILAL HUSSEIN?

Jawa Report: Bilal Hussein and the Continuing Saga of Insurgent Propaganda via the Media or Bilal Hussein, Fauxtographer
Posted by: ed   2006-09-18 11:13  

#2  Michelle Malkin is all over this today. My sympathy meter is currently at minus 10.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-09-18 10:44  

#1  he just so happened to be a cell phone and comp salesman too. wonder how many ied's they made when he gave them his inventory?
Posted by: sinse   2006-09-18 09:28  

00:00