You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
'Al Qaeda hijacked Indian plane in 1998'
2006-09-17
Al Qaeda operatives hijacked an Indian airliner in 1998 to secure the release of Pakistani militant Maulana Masood Azhar, Abu Jandal, a former guard of Osama Bin Laden disclosed in a one and a half hour documentary aired by Al-Jazeera Television on Saturday. The world's most wanted man's bodyguard recalled that Bin Laden welcomed Azhar after his release from an Indian jail preceding the hijacking of a plane that landed in of Kandahar and threw a lavish party in Azhar's honour.

Abu Jandal also said that Bin Laden's original plan to target the USS Cole in international waters failed to work in 1998 and instead, Al-Qaeda hit the warship while it was in Yemenite waters by mistake, something, he pointed out, was against the policy of Al Qaeda, ie to undertake acts which could be embarrassing for Muslim countries. He also narrated the exact details of Northern Alliance Leader Ahmed Shah Masood's assassination a day before 9/11 on the Taliban's request.

Abu Jandal said that on the day the Indian Airlines plane was hijacked, he was told to ready his Stinger missiles, and emergency was declared at the Kandahar Airport in 30 minutes. "I was told that other planes will also follow this one and there is a chance that the situation could deteriorate," he said. After two or three days, Bin Laden invited Azhar to a lavish party, thrown in his honour, where I was introduced to him,” he said. “I was astonished to discover that Azhar and Bin Laden already knew each other,” he said.
Posted by:Fred

#2  My immediate response to 9-11 was to advocate the immediate carpet bombing of Kandahar the ummah.

My suggestion, now.

After 9/11, I figured the Taliban would have to go, and that Saddam would likely need to go. After the anthrax attacks, my big worry was how we would respond to the WMD attack -- our policy was to respond in kind, and that meant someone would be getting nukes.

Of course, instead we assigned the least competent gang of morons we could find in the FBI and got to watch them chase geese and take their tips from political hack, conspiracy-mongering reporters. So we pissed away any resemblance of deterrence we had to WMD attacks.

Now, I don't care what happens to the world's Muslim population. They don't give a rat's ass about their own fate, and whip themselves into a fury every time we don't act like we're their slaves, so fuck 'em. Next natural disaster is Muslim lands shouldn't get a dime from the US, shouldn't even get assistance from our military. Helping them just pisses them off more, so let them rot.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2006-09-17 08:41  

#1  My immediate response to 9-11 was to advocate the immediate carpet bombing of Kandahar. To this day I continue to wonder if such an action might not have been the better message to send Islam. There would have been excellent chances of nailing mullah Omar and possibly bin Laden or some of his top brass.

Of course, I was roundly denounced for this. Back then I was sort of sorry for wanting such a thing. Now, I no longer am. Thank goodness I also predicted the use of fuel air bombs in the Afghanistan campaign and have never felt a single twinge of regret at Taleban having the lungs sucked out of their bodies.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-17 01:43  

00:00