You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
U.S. Troops Battle Insurgents in Eastern Afghanistan
2006-09-07
KANDAGAL, Afghanistan — U.S. troops on Wednesday launched a fearsome barrage of artillery and rockets into a mountainous militant stronghold in eastern Afghanistan where they suffered their deadliest combat loss over a year ago. Plumes of smoke rose over the top of pine tree-forested mountain ranges in Kunar province's Korangal Valley, where scores of troops from the New York-based 10th Mountain Division are trying to curb militant attacks in this volatile region bordering Pakistan. "We have had nonstop contact for several days and the enemy is on the run," said Staff Sgt. William Wilkinson, 36, of Charlotte, North Carolina, who heads a team firing mortars toward militant positions. "We have cut them off a couple of times and they are not doing as well as they thought they would."

No militant casualty figures were available from the heavy bombardment of locations some three miles deep into the Korangal Valley, where Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters have set off roadside bombings and staged ambushes targeting American and Afghan forces operating in the region. The Korangal Valley was the scene of a June 28, 2005, ambush by militants of a four-man U.S. special forces team, three of whom were killed and the other rescued days later. A U.S. helicopter sent to find the special forces also crashed in the valley on June 28, killing 16 American troops in the deadliest single attack on the U.S. military since the war began here in 2001.

"This is a place where the Taliban and Al Qaeda have (been) known to roam freely and right now we are putting a stop to that," Wilkinson said. The echo of cannon fire rumbled through the valley overnight and Wednesday as Howitzers fired round after round of 155 mm artillery shells toward insurgent positions. Tracer fire lit up the nighttime sky and Apaches helicopters fired rockets into hilltop positions.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Perv led the attack on Kashmir. When it was stopped by the Prez. he had a coup and took over. So what side does that put him on?

Next question!
Posted by: 3dc   2006-09-07 16:09  

#6  Anonymoose, Pakistan's army has never seriously gone after the Talibanized tribals, only the Bugti tribals - which doesn't upset the Islamist parties. Why on earth would they so drastically change attitude now?
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-09-07 13:35  

#5  N.B.: Out of the blue, Perv suddenly makes North Wazoo a "safe haven" for Taliban and al-Qaeda, and then *suddenly*, the US commences a major-ass attack in the Afghan province adjacent to it.

Why do I smell a big honking trap?

I suspect our intent is to herd as many Taliban as possible into North Wazoo, and then set up "anvil" positions along the border, so there is no coming back.

Once that border area is tight as a drum, then whenever it gets a mind to, the Pak army could enter North Wazoo in force and just slaughter those a-holes, and nowhere to run to.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-09-07 10:47  

#4  I just love the fact we can blow wazeristan (sp?) to hell without having to pay much political currancy over it.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-09-07 10:27  

#3  OS...We can only hope. Regardless, as you say...if there are no Pak troops along the border...
Posted by: anymouse   2006-09-07 10:26  

#2  If this doesn't stop, given the latest "agreement" NWaz has with the Pak Govt, we will begin policing the area ourselve swith long range artillery and airstrikes, and LRRPs.

The Pak Govt has basically washed its hands of the region with that agreement. It wasnt a surrender as much as it was a "Careful what you wish for, you might jsut get it" deal.

THEN:

"Hey you want Pak Govt troops out, they are out. You want tribal govts to run things? You got it. You wan Al Qaeda to be accepted? Fine, you can do whatever you want. Just remember, our troops are not going to be interfering with your little Talib paradise up here, leave us alone and we leave you along"

LATER:

What? You say American SF are killing your leaders, US Infantry is setting ambushes right on the border, US helicopters are prsuing you across the border and trashing your villages? You say yoru chiefs houses are being bombed and your villages are bing shelled day and night? OH, thats too bad. Remember, you wanted Pak troops out so we are out."

Even Later:

You want the border secure from Americans killing you and demolishing your tribe's vilalges? SOrry, YOU secure it, its what you demanded we do, "stay out of your business". The only alternative to letting the Amricans slam your asses is for the tribes to disarm completely, toss out the Arabs, and let the central govt put non-tribal Pak troops back in there."

Smart move by Pervez if this is what he had in mind.

Lets see how it plays out.
Posted by: Oldspook   2006-09-07 10:07  

#1  Paybacks are a bi+ch, aren't they? :-)

Must not have any tunnels handy if they haven't melted away yet. Keep that in mind for the future!
Posted by: gorb   2006-09-07 02:00  

00:00