You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Bush: Bin Laden's intentions as clear as Hitler's
2006-09-06
President Bush used terrorists' own words Tuesday to battle complacency among Americans about the threat of future attack, defending his record as the fall campaign season kicks into high gear. Quoting from letters, Web site statements, audio recordings and videotapes purportedly from terrorists, as well as documents found in various raids, Bush said that despite the absence of a successor on U.S. soil to the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the terrorist danger remains potent. "Bin laden and his terrorists' allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them," the president said before the Military Officers Association of America and diplomatic representatives of other countries that have suffered terrorist attacks. "The question is `Will we listen? Will we pay attention to what these evil men say?"'

“One document Bush cited was found in 2000 by British police during an anti-terrorist raid in London, which included a chapter called 'Guidelines for Beating and Killing Hostages.' ”
Bush said that al Qaeda has been weakened, with its leaders finding it harder to operate freely, move money or communicate with operatives. But, he said the terrorist network has adapted to U.S. defenses by increasingly using the Internet to spread propaganda, recruit new terrorists and conduct training. In addition, the movement has become more dispersed, with local cells more self-directed and responsible for more attacks.

One document Bush cited was what he called "a grisly al Qaeda manual" found in 2000 by British police during an anti-terrorist raid in London, which included a chapter called "Guidelines for Beating and Killing Hostages." He also cited what he said was a captured al Qaeda document found during a recent raid in Iraq. He said it described plans to take over Iraq's western Anbar province and set up a governing structure including an education department, a social services department, a justice department and an execution unit. "The terrorists who attacked us on September the 11th, 2001, are men without conscience, but they're not madmen," he said. "They kill in the name of a clear and focused ideology, a set of beliefs that are evil but not insane."

His speech came after the White House released a strategy paper proclaiming the nation has made progress in the war on terror but that al Qaeda has adjusted to U.S. defenses and "we are not yet safe."
Posted by:Fred

#12  But if Bin Laded = Hitler and we know that Bush = Hitler, then does Bush = Bin Laden? And what does that leave for an Israeli lader (i.e., not Olmert)?

Jackal, please leave the caplock equations to our resident expert, Joe. Life will be a lot less confusing for you. Trust me.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-09-06 18:10  

#11  James is the sock puppet he keeps in his pocket. Never know when an opportunity to give himself a ringing endorsement might present itself. :)
Posted by: flyover   2006-09-06 15:31  

#10  Uh, that would be Keith Olberman. Still a putz.
Posted by: remoteman   2006-09-06 15:26  

#9  I watched James Olberman's commentary on this speech last night (just to torture myself). What a freakin putz that guy is. He was incensed at the references to Nazi Germany that the administration is so accurately making. Typical liberal talking point that the president is just trying to make the American populace scared so that they are malleable. Did I say he was a putz. Well, he is.
Posted by: remoteman   2006-09-06 15:26  

#8  Rep. John Murtha, a hawkish Democrat who voted in favor of the war but now favors withdrawing troops, said the administration has so badly botched the war that a draft might be necessary.

I wish I could make this stuff up.

His opposition
Posted by: Bobby   2006-09-06 14:08  

#7  But if Bin Laded = Hitler and we know that Bush = Hitler, then does Bush = Bin Laden? And what does that leave for an Israeli lader (i.e., not Olmert)?

Posted by: Jackal   2006-09-06 09:39  

#6  I sure hope so. I hate it when he gets off message.
Posted by: Fred   2006-09-06 08:01  

#5  SOP35/rat:

This really was GWB's best speech yet.

I believe the President will be giving 3 more speaches before he lectures the UN on the 19th. This is a series, and will signal a change in WOT. The Sunni Triangle is out of control, and won't cool down until the Shiites are squelched. Someone is getting taken to the Texas woodshed.
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-09-06 03:52  

#4  Let Bush be Bush and the results are encouraging.
Posted by: flyover   2006-09-06 02:40  

#3  This really was GWB's best speech yet. Even better than the megaphone. Very clearly spoken with good inflection, no stuttering, lots of passion. You could tell he meant it. Should have done it sooner, is all.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-09-06 02:26  

#2  There was surprisingly little publicity with the White House report release. Strange. Check out the pdf:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nsct/2006/index.html
Posted by: Snease Shaiting3550   2006-09-06 02:01  

#1  So the statement from Pakiwakiland on Binny would tend to be aligning themselves with the Axis camp.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-09-06 01:45  

00:00