You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
India to keep existing troops in UNIFIL for 'time being'
2006-08-29
India proposes to keep for the "time being" its existing troops in the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) but would not add any more forces to it, official sources said on Monday. "As of now, the existing Indian troops in UNIFIL will be there for the time being. But there will be no addition to the existing forces," they said when asked about New Delhi's position in view of the change of mandate for UNIFIL.

A feeling is growing here that the role of the 2000-men strong UNIFIL, which includes 672 Indian troops, is more of "peace enforcer" than that of peacekeeper in view of alteration of its mandate on August 11. The sources said the aims, objectives and rules of engagement of the un force were unclear. "We are also not clear about the equation UNIFIL will have with the Israeli forces, the Lebanese Army and the Hezbollah militants," they said, indicating that India did not want its forces to get involved in military operations.
Posted by:Fred

#2  It's one thing to give the Sikh regimentals R&R in Lebanon wearing blue berets. Quite another to ask them to work under impossible conditions and ultimately the control of Jacques Chirac.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-29 12:03  

#1  The troops there, from the 4th Sikh Regiment, are quite tough with combat experience.

Looks like the Indian Government doesn't fancy its troops going into action under French command?
Posted by: john   2006-08-29 07:45  

00:00