You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
After starting reactor, Iran fires Gulf missile
2006-08-28
An increasingly defiant Iran, resisting pressure to halt its uranium enrichment activities by a Thursday deadline, inaugurated a heavy-water nuclear reactor Saturday and then, as if to punctuate its point, fired a long-range missile on Sunday from a submarine in the Gulf.
Brilliant. Simply brilliant.
Washington, in its own diplomatic escalation, has increasingly dropped hints that the United States might organize tougher economic sanctions against Iran, independent of the United Nations, if the Security Council fails to do so.
This is known as "shucking the bucket from the national foot."
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad inaugurated the reactor near Arak, southwest of Tehran, a provocative gesture coming days before the deadline set by the Security Council for Iran to halt its enrichment work. But while vowing to pursue nuclear work, Ahmadinejad insisted that "we are not a threat for any country."
"Yeah. Trust us on that."
Nuclear experts say, however, that heavy-water facilities are more useful for weapons than civilian purposes, because they produce lots of plutonium, the preferred ingredient for missile warheads.
Yeah. There is that. But really, they're not gonna do that. Really. They're gonna do... ummm... something else.
"Iran will continue its enrichment," its chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, was quoted as having told the Iranian news agency ISNA, Reuters reported from Tehran. "We will never stop it."
"Never! We're gonna enrich uranium until the day we all die!"
Iran seemed to be playing on the doubts that appear to be dividing the Security Council on whether to carry out the threatened sanctions. Russia and China, both permanent members of the council, supported the resolution that set the deadline. But since last Tuesday, when Iran sent a 21-page proposal to the five permanent members and Germany, leaving open the possibility of suspending enrichment once negotiations began, they have cooled to the sanctions talk. Britain and France have also been less insistent about sanctions than has the United States.
This is the diplotactic known as "divide and conquer." I don't think any of us had any doubts as to how the lineup was going to fall out.
“Iran appears to have concluded that the United States is too bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan to want to engage in another conflict in the region”
Iran, according to political analysts in Tehran, appears to have concluded that the United States is too bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan to want to engage in another conflict in the region, and it believes that the perceived victory of Hezbollah in its war with Israel has strengthened Iran's political capital in the region. Iran is a supporter of Hezbollah. The Security Council will base its next move partly on a report Thursday from the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iranian nuclear program. It appears virtually certain that the agency will conclude that nuclear enrichment activity is continuing, according to diplomats quoted by Reuters.
I don't think even the IAEA is capable of the sort of mental convolutions that'd be required to say that it's not...
One senior diplomat said that the focus on Iran's refusing to halt enrichment should not distract attention from what he said was Iran's "thoughtful counterproposal that did not rule out suspension as part of negotiations." This, he said, was "as positive as anyone could have hoped."
Actually, "okay" would be as positive as anyone could have hoped. The "thoughtful counterproposal," followed by firing up the reactor and the missile launch, was about what we were expecting.
Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general, is scheduled to visit Tehran on Saturday, two days after the deadline.
Right. That'll help.
John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, reportedly has conferred with countries that include Britain and Japan on the possibility that an independent coalition of countries could impose economic sanctions if the Security Council fails to do so. The United States already subjects Iran to some trade and financial constraints. "You don't need Security Council authority to impose sanctions, just as we have," Bolton told The Los Angeles Times, in an interview.
Time to give the UN the ditch in practice, even if we continue lip servicing the organization...
France has termed the Iranian response "not satisfactory," but Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy said that France wanted to avoid moving toward a "clash of civilizations."
"Y'see, if we let them roll right over us, why, it'll soon be all over and they'll be rolling over somebody else, and we'll probably still have something left. And if we move at just the right time, why, we can change sides, and then they'll let us roll with them. This is the new Eurostrategy!"
"The worst thing would be to escalate into a confrontation with Iran on the one hand - and the Muslim world with Iran - and the West," he told a French radio interviewer. "That would be the clash of civilizations that France today is practically alone in trying to avoid."
By this point, France is practically alone in failing to recognize that it's been under way for years.
Even as the Bush administration explores independent sanctions, some in Washington have expressed doubts that the United States, with its heavy military commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its own political capital in the region damaged, has many attractive options. "It's a really bad situation," Senator Joseph Biden said Sunday on Fox Television. Biden, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said that the United States should continue pressing other countries to support sanctions, but that if that effort failed, there was little the United States could do. "We'll need to come up with a serious containment policy for the region," he said.
"Containment" means letting them continue to do what they've been doing, which is establishing themselves as the regional hegemons, and trying to stay out of their way while they do it. What neither Biden nor the Medes and the Persians comprehend is that the bulk of the U.S. military isn't in Iraq or Afghanistan, nor the two together. Neither do they understand that there's a difference between combined arms operations and occupation duty. When the balloon actually goes up, assuming we don't fall victim to Casualty Avoidance Syndrome, the U.S. military will roll over the Elite Revolutionary Guards and the Basij bully boyz in something under two weeks, with something on the order of 200 or fewer friendly casualties.
The details of the Iranian response presented Tuesday were not released. But Hossein Shariatmadari, editor of the Iranian daily newspaper Kayhan, said that the Iranian document noted 50 "ambiguities" in the incentives package offered to Iran in exchange for halting its nuclear activities. These would require clarification, said Shariatmadari, who was appointed by Iran's Fearless supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Meaning they intend to by more time by interminable talking and occasionally walking out in a huff.
The Iranian missile fired Sunday came from a submarine involved in military exercises in the Gulf, the Iranian state television reported, Reuters said. While the missile was described as a long-range radar-evading Sagheb or Thaqeb air-defense missile, a brief video clip shown on television showed it emerging from the water before hitting a target on the surface less than a short distance away, The Associated Press reported.
That would imply it's a modification of an air defense missile, assuming the description's correct...
Iran conducted war exercises in the Gulf in April as well. Analysts said those seemed to send the message that Iran could disrupt vital oil shipping lanes if outside powers pressed it too hard.
By shutting down the Straights of Hormuz. That used to be the example the Dems used for a war they could support, up until Gulf War I.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Economic sanctions? Let's see, that means more under the table oil deals for Kofi and the U.N.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-08-28 17:29  

#8  No reactor was started. It will be at least 2009 before it is finished.
Waht was opened was a heavy water production plant.
Posted by: john   2006-08-28 15:18  

#7  Noticed some recently implanted hair plugs on Goofy Biden, must be going for the prez job.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-08-28 14:45  

#6  You and many of the rest of us.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-08-28 13:51  

#5  UN Sanctions are not going to make any difference because:
1) the Russkies, Chinese and possibly Eurabians will deal with Ahmadi under the table.
2) Ahmadibaby is willing to starve 20 million of his compatriots to death which he would consider a small sacrifice for achieving Nuclear capabilities and Hegemony in the region.

The only solution is and will remain a strong US counterstrike (possibly with some tactical nuclear weapons thrown in) to decapitate the snake.
The longer the US waits, the heavier will be the price that western civilization will pay in lost lives and economical devastation.

I know I sound like a F****ing proffet but I really believe this.
Posted by: Elder of Zion   2006-08-28 13:42  

#4  Are we gonna stop em or not? I'm tired of the suspense.
Posted by: Gliting Jinenter9646   2006-08-28 13:31  

#3  clash of civilizations

The Iranian government isn't civilized so this doesn't apply. :-)

Anyway, the reactor thingy seems like a replay of NKor's moves with their reactor five minutes before they claimed to have a bomb. Which I still mostly doubt.
Posted by: gorb   2006-08-28 05:31  

#2  After starting reactor, Iran fires a Gulf missile, then hangs half dozen teenage girls before the noon prayers, and stones a few women to death who were immodest enuff to be raped.

Ahhh the Ummah
Posted by: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad   2006-08-28 02:07  

#1  Ahmadinejad insisted that "we are not a threat for any country.

"What about your vow to wipe Israel off of the map?"

"Well, of course there's Israel."

"And what about The Great Satan, America."

"Well, yes, The United States, too."

"And what about America's lapdog Britain."

"I suppose they're on the list, too."

"And Britain's colony, Australia?"

"Look. Besides Israel, The United States of America, The United Kingdom, Australia and most of Europe, we're really not a threat for anyone at all. Is that clear?"
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-28 00:59  

00:00