You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Harris Clarifies Comments on Religion
2006-08-28
U.S. Rep. Katherine Harris told a religious journal that separation of church and state is "a lie" and God and the nation's founding fathers did not intend the country be "a nation of secular laws." The Republican candidate for U.S. Senate also said that if Christians are not elected, politicians will "legislate sin," including abortion and gay marriage.
Thank you for your opinion, Katherine. Goodbye.
Harris made the comments which she clarified Saturday in the Florida Baptist Witness, the weekly journal of the Florida Baptist State Convention, which interviewed political candidates and asked them about religion and their positions on issues. Separation of church and state is "a lie we have been told," Harris said in the interview, published Thursday, saying separating religion and politics is "wrong because God is the one who chooses our rulers."
Nope. Religion and politix are separate because religion is interpreted by holy men. We don't need shariah in this country, and we don't need the Inquisition. We don't need mandatory church attendance and we don't need tithes. Goodbye, Katherine. Enjoy your new career, whatever it is.
"If you're not electing Christians, then in essence you are going to legislate sin," Harris said.
Some of us enjoy our occasional spot of sin. Some of us, in fact, consider ourselves fairly virtuous without adhering to Katherine's definition of sin. I enjoy an occasional beer with dinner and at least once a year I drink too much, becoming shamefully sloshed. I enjoy looking at pretty girls, the more scantily-clad the better. After five years of daily study, we're entirely too familiar here with the politix and culture of the NWFP to want to approximate it with a facsimile originating in the Ozarks or Pogo country.
Her comments drew criticism, including some from fellow Republicans who called them offensive and not representative of the party.
"Stoopid" was the word that first sprang to my mind.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., who is Jewish, told the Orlando Sentinel that she was "disgusted" by the comments.
I'd guess Debbie doesn't want to be required to present herself at the local Baptist church every Sunday any more than I do.
Harris' campaign released a statement Saturday saying she had been "speaking to a Christian audience, addressing a common misperception that people of faith should not be actively involved in government." The comments reflected "her deep grounding in Judeo-Christian values," the statement said, adding that Harris had previously supported pro-Israel legislation and legislation recognizing the Holocaust.
I'd say her comments reflected appalling stupidity and that she's not the person I'd want representing me in the Senate. I hate seeing that seat go to a Democrat, but I still wouldn't vote for Katherine.
Reminds me of the choice I had last election for the Senate: Barack Obama, a very liberal but reasonable sounding guy, or the wingnut fool Alan Keyes. Had to hold my nose and shut my eyes as I punched out the chad for Mr. Obama, but that's what I did.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Meds, JoJo, meds.
Posted by: Snosing Snoque7421   2006-08-28 22:31  

#10  No, the Lefties started out decades ago as
"freedom from religion/freedom of worship", but now has become "There is no God/No God except Man and Government". Pragmatically, God = Faith is what induces both individuals-Society to become better than what they are. Secular Government = Law/Legalism tells the Masses what they can't do, God-Faith tells them what they can be. GOD-FAITH = UNIVERSAL/COMMON IDEALISMS-TRADITIONS = UNIVERSAL/COMMON INNOVATION = UNIV PROGRESS = UNIV UTOPIA/EQUALISM. The Failed Lefties are the Failed Lefties becuz, for all their talk of universal equalism, humanism, Libertarianism, Pluralism-Diversity, and universal anti-materialism/anti-property, GOVERNMENT-BUREAUCRATISM IS NEVER ALLOWED TO BE TRANSCENDED, I.E. BIGGER GOVERNMENT-BUREACRACY IS ALWAYS BETTER, AND MUST ALWAYS CONTROL. EVERYONE IS EQUAL WHEN NO ONE HAS ANY RIGHTS NOR IS ABLE TO DEFEND THEIR RIGHTS - you know, why Lefties [ideo]believe SOCIALISM = UNIVERSAL GOVERNMENTISM IS NOT REPRESSIVE. Is why RIGHTISM, NOT LEFISM, is the true path to UTOPIA - the Failed Lefties know it, which is why are RINOS-CINOS. Iff one accepts that the WOT = War against Islam-fascism = also a WAR AGAINST FASCISM, by definition any War against Fascism or forms of FASCISM/RIGHTIST SOCIALISM is also a War FOR its Antithesis = is WAR FOR COMMUNISM = LEFTIST SOCIALISM!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-08-28 21:53  

#9  I'm kinda leaning your way Art. I don't like here tactics but she is more right than wrong. After watching years of attempts by the ACLU to try to take down our Mt. Soledad War Memorial (which is a cross) on the basis of separation of church and state I have altered my opinion somewhat. The 1st Amendment says "Congress shall may no law respecting the establishment of religion" but it also goes on to say "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." It is the second part of that first sentence that concerns me the most. Atheists/Agnostics are trying to prevent people (Christians in particular) from expressing their religious views everywhere. Whether it's a cross on a hill or teachings at school they believe Christianity should not be visible. And there's no evidence the founding fathers ever intended that. Here in California 4th graders have to learn about Islam. They pick an Islamic name and in some schools dress up in traditional Islamic garb. But just try to teach them the 10 commandments and the ACLU will be on you like white on rice. In reality every lawmaker brings their personal beliefs to work with them whether they say it or not. They make judgement calls on right and wrong every day. And for most people those judgement calls are impacted by thier religious beliefs.
Posted by: Intrinsicpilot   2006-08-28 15:22  

#8  Well, both sides frame the debate incorrectly. The left frames it as a separation meaning no mention of God or religion in public life., i.e., freedom FROM religion. Harris' side frames it as no separation whatsoever, to the extent that Christianity becomes the de facto official religion. The truth is much more profound and practical: Freedom OF religion. No official state church, and no prohibition from exercising the religion of your choice. That's all it says. Read it for yourself.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-08-28 15:02  

#7  Wait a minute. When did the term "seperation of church and state" become part of our constitution. Am I missing something? I may not agree with her behavior but at least she stated a fact that seperation of church and state is a lie.
Posted by: Art   2006-08-28 11:10  

#6  I'd still hit it even if she couldn't get my vote.

Obama vs. Keyes? I think I'd go with Keyes just because of the Cosby sweaters.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2006-08-28 10:46  

#5  Oh, Keyes was funny to listen to. But I wasn't going to vote for him, and I can't stand to leave a ballot blank.
Posted by: Steve White   2006-08-28 10:28  

#4  Steve
Keyes is fun to listen to. Where is your sense of fun?
Posted by: 3dc   2006-08-28 10:18  

#3  Nice pic of her waving bye-bye to her Senate chances.
Posted by: Swamp Blondie   2006-08-28 08:48  

#2  I remember that quandary at the last election Dr. Steve. But at least Keyes is his own wingnut, whereas Obama is a bought-and-paid-for tool of the moonbats. When he talks, you can't even see their lips move.
Posted by: Spot   2006-08-28 08:43  

#1  she's an embarrassment
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-28 08:42  

00:00