| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks |
| Russian Footprints |
| 2006-08-25 |
| What does Moscow have to do with the recent war in Lebanon? By Ion Mihai Pacepa The Kremlin may be the main winner in the Lebanon war. Israel has been attacked with Soviet Kalashnikovs and Katyushas, Russian Fajr-1 and Fajr-3 rockets, Russian AT-5 Spandrel antitank missiles and Kornet antitank rockets. Russia’s outmoded weapons are now all the rage with terrorists everywhere in the world, and the bad guys know exactly where to get them. The weapons cases abandoned by Hezbollah were marked: “Customer: Ministry of Defense of Syria. Supplier: KBP, Tula, Russia.” |
| Posted by:twobyfour |
| #6 Your right TW, my point, or poor snark, was the Afghans were a formidable threat and really put it to the Russian military with or without our help. Karma in a sad way, being it was muzzies that did it. This whole article really upset me. To think the Russians really had something to do with this terrorism problem other than selling guns is disturbing. I know IÂ’m naive. I worked at a junk yard and the owner fed the dogÂ’s flairs and gunpowder. At night they tortured the dogs. This made for dogs that would kill anything at night and hide during the day. If this is true the Russians did the same thing with the Muzzies, fed them hate and tormenting until there is no cure. The only way to cure the dogs was to kill them, like the muzzies there is no way to get them to integrate into the world society peacefully. Our options are limited, crush them or live like they do and enter their circle of violence and hate. If this is really a second order effect of the cold war we should hold the Russian leaders accountable in the world court. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-08-25 20:04 |
| #5 For "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" alone, the Soviets have much to answer for. The rest is so damning that a significant portion of this world's woes are a direct byproduct of Soviet communism. May they all rot in everlasting hell. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2006-08-25 18:46 |
| #4 The Afghanis weren't a pet terrorist organization, 49 Pan. They started as a legitimate native uprising, even if they did go on to become a tool of Pakistan's ISI, funded for a while by the CIA under the mistaken heading of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2006-08-25 15:29 |
| #3 Sounds good but was it not the muzzies that handed them their asses in Afghanistan???? |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2006-08-25 15:19 |
| #2 Puttie Persian cat petting graphic please, PLEASE! PLEASE! |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2006-08-25 12:06 |
| #1 Pacepa's Red Horizons was extrordinarily informative in many ways, but I was particulary struck at the time the section dedicated to Arafat and the PLO. Ceausescu would send his jet for Arafat, and after his entourage deplaned they'd have to sterilize the aircraft due to the stench. Also, Ceausescu would provide young boys for Arafat to rape while visiting Romania. Such a wonderful soul, that Arafat. |
| Posted by: gb506 2006-08-25 12:03 |