You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Blinky Hans Blix: Iran is "certainly not now" developing any bomb
2006-08-22
LONDON (IRNA) -- Former director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Hans Blix says that he is certain Iran is not making a nuclear weapon and believes that the West should restart talks to resolve its desire to enrich uranium.

Now, that makes me feel all warm inside

Iran is "certainly not now" developing any bomb and even the CIA believe that it might take up to 2010 or 2112 to have any capacity, Blix said Tuesday.

"So there is time to talk and that is an important point," he said in an interview with Today, BBC Radio Four's flagship current affairs program. "I think the west should continue talking with Iran," he said.

Blix, who now chairs the Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, made his call ahead of Iran's expected formal response to a package of incentives being offered by the permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany.

"There is something curious about the offer they made in the spring to come to talks, including with the US which was seen as a big concession, but only if Iran first suspends enrichment," he said.
Hey - just because they were breaking the Non-proliferation Treaty doesn't mean you should be, like, SUSPICIOUS or anything. Shame on you!

The former IAEA director general, who was also the UN's chief arms inspector ahead of the Iraq war, further criticized the Security Council for making the same demand to first suspend in its resolution on July 31.

"They are asking the Iranians really to give up their chief leverage and what should be the chief subject of the negotiations" about resolving the dispute, he said.

During his interview, Blix also believed that it was "not very wise" of both the U.S. and Britain not to rule out military adventurism against Iran.
"There has been too much whipping or threats of whipping all the times," he said, adding that the issue should be about Iran being taken "seriously."
And ponies. Don't forget the ponies. Oh -- and the worldwide Caliphate. Can't forget that one either.
The former chief arms inspector said that he was "doubtful" if Iran felt threatened by its neighbors for any need to develop a nuclear deterrent.
Of course they're not threatened by their neighbors - they plan to dominate and in some cases annex them. And in any case, you've got to keep priorities straight. First, the worldwide conquest by Islam. THEN we talk about who runs things in the Ummah.

"But Iran may be worried about the U.S.," he said. Washington should not up its threats against the Iranians as he believed it may have the opposite effect and "incite them." Asked whether he thought other countries, including Brazil and Japan, who already have uranium enrichment facilities, posed any threat to develop a nuclear weapons, Blix suggested that it depended on "political will."

"Any country with a big industrial capacity in technology could perhaps, but depends if they have the political will," he said, but he added that he did not think either Brazil or Japan had any intentions at the moment.

"What we do not know is if the US continues to develop capacity and there is no disbarment then the atmosphere may change," the former IAEA chief warned as a possibility.
So what Blix really wants is to disarm the US. Interesting he is that open about it -- but then, Ahmadinajad has made it acceptable to say all sorts of things that people once hid.
Posted by:Captain America

#16  It's been simply ages since poor Mr. Blix was active in the inspecting game. He is no longer qualified to have an opinion. (Not that he actually ever was, since he never really inspected properly, but that's a subject we no longer need worry about, thank goodness!)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-08-22 22:56  

#15  "There has been too much whipping or threats of whipping all the times"

The mullah (@ss) whipping hasn't even started. Iran must be taken down.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-08-22 22:23  

#14  He keeps mentioning "whipping" because he's into S&M. Look it up!

Now if Condi put on a vinyl cat suit and whipped him within a centimeter of his life he would sing our praises.

One sick little twerp!
Posted by: 3dc   2006-08-22 21:59  

#13  Yes, Blixie usually rears his irrelevant head about every two months.
Back in the hole Blixie...
Posted by: tu3031   2006-08-22 21:53  

#12  Why oh why won't this POS go away everytime I forget about him somebody brings him back up.
Posted by: djohn66   2006-08-22 21:21  

#11  And I think we should forcefully state that we will not abide a bunch of religous maniacs with demonstrated proclivities of slaughtering the infidel neighbors posessing nuclear weapons.

So look at it this way: you can get reasonable, or you can get dead.
Posted by: Uleagum Shereque4064   2006-08-22 21:20  

#10  Okay, thanks - the title is hotlinked now.
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-22 20:58  

#9  Lotp, sorry:

Link
Posted by: Captain America   2006-08-22 20:56  

#8  aneewunz got anee kitteefish?
Posted by: muck4doo   2006-08-22 20:50  

#7  Is ol' Hans suggesting that we show submissive behavior to the alpha dog Iran?

If so then he should just fuck off and die. They are a speck of fly shit compared to the US and EU together. They don't warrant an equal share in world politics, they don't have the population, economy, hell, they don't even have a bomb yet. It hasn't exactly put ol Kimmie over the top has it?
So screw Iran, our way or the highway, because we say so, that's why.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-08-22 20:45  

#6  
And thus spake Hans Brixs
Posted by: macofromoc   2006-08-22 20:10  

#5  "What we do not know is if the US continues to develop capacity and there is no disbarment then the atmosphere may change,"

I'm no Albert freakin' Einstein, but it seems that we still retain the capacity to do damage to Iran many, many times over without having to add capacity. Nice try at turning the tables, though.

During his interview, Blix also believed that it was "not very wise" of both the U.S. and Britain not to rule out military adventurism against Iran.

Removing the double negative (classic disinformation technique), it's then wise of us and Britain to rule out military adventurism (wtf ?) against Iran?

Blixie, ol' boy - how many diplomatic efforts have ever succeeded without a credible threat of the use of force (diplomacy by other means)? One example will suffice.

CA's right - Blixie wants us to bend over.
Posted by: Raj   2006-08-22 19:38  

#4  I realize the odds are probably far below Zero, but wouldn't it be nice if the UN was the intended target?

By the same token NY is surely safe, the UN would go apeshit.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-08-22 19:29  

#3  What, of any substance, can be said in the face of such stupidity except: Why is he still breathing?
Posted by: Rex Mundi   2006-08-22 19:17  

#2  Blinky Hans Blix: Iran is "certainly not now" developing any bomb

Oh, Finished already?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2006-08-22 19:14  

#1  Captain, I looked but couldn't find the link for this version of the story. Post here please and I'll attach it to the article.
Posted by: lotp   2006-08-22 19:13  

00:00