You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Halutz says decision to expand conflict against Lebanon was not endorsed
2006-08-17
(KUNA) -- Israel's Defense Forces (IDF) Chief of Staff Dan Halutz said Wednesday the decision to expand the armed incursion to the Lebanese Litani River was not endorsed because it was not expected the conflict would continue for longer than 48 hours.

Halutz, who appeared before the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee at the Knesset, said the decision to expand the war to the Litani River had come before UN Security Council Resolution 1701 was issued. Halutz declined to answer some questions he was asked, specifically on the "reasons for moving Israeli forces at such a large scale even after a US-French breakthrough was reached" on the conflict. The chief of staff had said that the IDF could be forced to stay in south Lebanon for months until the deployment of the expanded United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).

Halutz had reportedly sold his shares in the Tel Aviv Stock Market shortly after Hezbollah abducted two Israeli soldiers on July 12 triggering the more than month-long destructive conflict. Some Israeli MPs had called for prosecuting Halutz on charges of using his insider information for personal profit on the share market.
Posted by:Fred

#1  I think this is the key to Israeli actions. They were caught flat-footed by the large weapos emplacements and the extensive tunnel/bunker network. They,like the US, are enamored of air power and thought air "shock & awe" would quickly make Hezbs plead for ceasefire. This is not going to happen. As a former ground pounder, I know how valuable air support is. But boots are necessary for taking and controlling territory and dominating the enemy. Cheap surgical attacks don't stop fanatical foes. Masses losses eventually stop him. If air is used, massive wide area bombing like in Germany and Japan in WW II is actually much more effective. It takes out infrastructure, military, and civilians. The overall loss is what really brings them to their knees. Get over wars without casualties. It's only a fantasy.
Posted by: SOP35/Rat   2006-08-17 11:16  

00:00