You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
UN resolution to be followed ‘strictly’: Russia
2006-08-13
MOSCOW - Russia said Saturday it expected all sides involved in the conflict in Lebanon to abide ‘strictly’ by a new United Nations resolution calling for an end to the bloodshed. ‘We expect all sides to abide strictly to the decision by the UN Security Council,’ the Russian foreign ministry said in a written statement.

The resolution adopted Friday is ‘a first important step on the path to overcoming this extremely dangerous crisis,’ the statement said.

Resolution 1701, drawn up by the United States and France after protracted haggling, also calls for Israeli troops to be withdrawn from southern Lebanon after an end to the fighting.

Russian President Vladimir Putin telephoned Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to tell him the resolution presented ‘a chance for a political settlement’, the Kremlin said. Putin stressed that it was the ‘only reasonable alternative’ to an expansion of the ground war in Lebanon and called for its ‘rapid’ implementation.
Hmmm, implement the resolution or expand the ground war. Decisions, decisions ...
The Russian foreign ministry said an initiative put forward by Moscow to adopt a brief resolution on a ‘humanitarian ceasefire’ had ‘helped speed up a consensus in the Security Council’ on the US-French proposal.

The statement also stressed that the ‘original reason’ for the conflict in Lebanon was the absence of a peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians. ‘One of the main aims of the international community should be to focus efforts on creating the conditions for a resumption of the peace process in this region,’ the ministry said.
Yep, gotta fire up the peace processor!
Posted by:Steve White

#6  Russians traditionally have been sticklers for the letter of treaties, violating the hell out of the spirit, however. That is why they intensely argue the exact language--to insure they have loopholes to do what they want to do, while the other side is restricted.

They would be there solely to protect their old ally, Syria, from the Israeli army.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-08-13 08:44  

#5  Concentrate on Ichkeria, Vlad.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-08-13 06:06  

#4  So, Putin. Do you have a way to end the "Kill all the Jews" plans formenting down there?
Posted by: newc   2006-08-13 01:36  

#3  Yup, the Russians would end up being a problem. We don't want them in there. The French are not helpful either.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-08-13 01:13  

#2  Don't think we want the Ruskies to do anything in Mideast, Sock. What they are doing is not helpful.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-08-13 01:10  

#1  How about it Putin you get your guys to go in and disarm Hizb'allah. The French have already stated thay have no intention to. That being the case I can expect that Israel might reject the UN Security council resolution,

Russian boots on the ground not taking no for an answer.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-08-13 01:08  

00:00