You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Liquid Threat Is Hard to Detect
2006-08-11
Decent, tech-oriented NYT article once you get past the obligatory Bush bashing.
WASHINGTON, Aug. 10 — Despite knowing for years that liquid explosives posed a threat to airline safety, security agencies have made little progress in deploying technology that could help defend against such attacks, security experts say.
"But you can rest assured we'd give you the full details if they had! Remember, we're all the news that hurts George Bush."
Since September 2001, the federal government has hired tens of thousands of government screeners and upgraded its metal detectors and X-ray machines. But most of the equipment is still oriented toward preventing a metallic gun or other easily identifiable weapon from being carried aboard; it cannot distinguish shampoo from an explosive. Cathleen A. Berrick, director of the Government Accountability OfficeÂ’s homeland security and justice division, told a Senate committee in February 2005 that the Transportation Security Administration, part of the Department of Homeland Security, redirected more than half of the $110 million it had for research and development in 2003 to pay for personnel costs of screeners, delaying research in areas including detecting liquid explosives. It has continued to redirect some research and development money, she said Thursday.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  The MSM has long reported on how Commies/Maoists are supporting Radical Islam and akigned terror orgs - iff the Radical Islamists recognize or are aware of the Left's 2015-2020 timeline to force America under anti-Amer Socialism + anti-sovereign OWG. IMO the destruction of 6-20 airliners over America, while graphic and deadly, is not enuff. IMO the agenda of the Radical Islamists + Failed/Angry Left is better accomplished by using these airliners to spread BIO-WAR or CHEM-WAR AGENTS. Also bear in mind that it is not unkknown for the leadership in many Islamist terror orgs to mislead their own suicidists as to time and place of death by detonation.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-08-11 22:16  

#8  nice shot, Kelly :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2006-08-11 20:45  

#7  ExploSives, ya know. I blame the keyboard. {;^)

#5 kelly, maintain your P.O.E or O.P.E or whichever it is. Colonel Mandrake will be along shortly to assist you.
Posted by: Parabellum   2006-08-11 19:55  

#6  MATTHEW L. WALD and ERIC LIPTON are typically ignorant MSM reporters.

The bombers weren't planning to carry "liquid exploxives" onto the planes.

'Nuff said.
Posted by: Parabellum   2006-08-11 19:50  

#5  It's really a muz plot to deprive us of our vital fluids :-))))
Posted by: kelly   2006-08-11 15:07  

#4  No carry on luggage over the long haul will cut into business traveler revenues which cuts into airline viability meaning fewer flights from fewer airlines at higher costs to everyone.
The carry on policy needs to be to be reorganized no doubt, but it needs to be thought out as well.
Posted by: Capsu 78   2006-08-11 13:03  

#3  Simple response: No cary on luggage. Period.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-08-11 11:41  

#2  Now without deoderant, toothpaste and perfume in our carry ons, might it be said-
Today, we are all Frenchman...
Posted by: Capsu 76   2006-08-11 11:26  

#1  I think that if you were smart enough, it would be pretty easy to smuggle even military grade explosives on an airliner using stuff that you could buy at Target. Any commercial battery would do. The hard part would be making a blasting cap that didn't look like a blasting cap. I could think of half a dozen ways to do that, too.

Luckily, most of these shaheed wannabees aren't smart enough to figure any of this out.
Posted by: 11A5S   2006-08-11 00:23  

00:00