You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Lowe's holds off on Chicago stores
2006-08-10
Lowe's has halted plans for two home-improvement centers in Chicago while Mayor Richard Daley weighs whether he will try to block the city's new "big-box" minimum-wage ordinance, a South Side alderman said Tuesday. The company's concerns about the law caused it to shelve plans for stores at 83rd Street and Stewart Avenue and at 79th Street and Cicero Avenue, said Ald. Howard Brookins Jr. (21st). "They changed their mind," said Brookins, whose ward includes the proposed store at 83rd and Stewart. "They now want to wait and see what happens."

Daley opposes the ordinance, which was passed by the City Council on July 26, but he has refused to say whether he would veto it. He has until Sept. 13 to decide whether he will exercise his veto power for the first time in his 17-year tenure as mayor.

David Katz of Northbrook-based A&R Management Inc., which manages the Scottsdale Shopping Center at 79th and Cicero, confirmed that Lowe's officials have postponed closing the deal for a new store there. "They won't sign the lease at this point," Katz said. "They are waiting to see if the mayor will veto the ordinance. Chances are they will pull out" unless the ordinance is vetoed.

Ald. Frank Olivo, whose 13th Ward includes the shopping center, was unavailable for comment. Attempts to reach Lowe's officials in the Chicago area and at the company's North Carolina headquarters were unsuccessful. The moves by Lowe's add fuel to the contentious fight over the ordinance. Labor unions pushed for the ordinance, but critics say it would stunt economic development in parts of Chicago that lack retail stores.
Posted by:Fred

#3  As a Chicagoan, I can tell you that the City Council was even more stoopid than usual. They've been looking for a way to assert their independence from Daley (they still take his money, of course, and they still need him to win re-election, but you know how the human heart is), saw this as a way to do it in a harmless way.

Plus, they had all the union people (the ones trying to organize Walmart), all the right trendy liberal progressives with their blabber about 'living wages', etc, on them. So they voted this one through without so much as a thought of the consequences.

I shop at a Lowes and a Home Depot at the 'Brickyard' mall in Chicago. I rather imagine those stores will stay for now, but don't look for any more. What the stores will do is what Walmart just did: they just opened a mega-store in a suburb literally across the street from the Chicago city limits. The Chicago resident there get the shopping, the suburb gets the employment and the tax revenues.

Shrewd, alderman, real shrewd.
Posted by: Steve White   2006-08-10 09:27  

#2  2 tar-jay stores have also said no thanks.

Doesn't matter if Richard II vetos, the vote was veto-proof.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2006-08-10 02:15  

#1  Cause <-> effect.

New concept for the mafia unions, I know.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-08-10 00:17  

00:00