You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Behind Lebanon's Unwillingness to Implement 1559
2006-07-31
If you are like me, you're wondering why Lebanon failed to implement 1559. Well, here is some insight into the reason.

Incidentially, prominent pro-democracy figures in Lebanon have been assassinated since the Cedar Revolution of 2004: Samir Kassir, Edmond Naim (died of "old age"), and Gebran Tuemi.

Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs David Welch has criticized the meeting between Gen. Michel Aoun and Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, saying it could delay the implementation of an international decision that calls on Hizbullah to disarm.

Speaking at the Foreign Press Center in Washington, Welch said the U.S. viewed the meeting between Aoun and Nasrallah as a discussion between two political currents, and not a government discussion. But when asked if he believed that the implementation of U.N. Resolution 1559 has been undermined by the statement of cooperation between Hizbullah and the Free Patriotic Movement, Welch said: "We are concerned about any understandings, whatever their status, that would appear to postpone such a decision."

Earlier this week, Hizbullah and the FPM issued a 10-point joint statement of cooperation stating that holding arms was an honorable and sacred way for a resistance group to defend its occupied land. The two parties also said that the Lebanese should take responsibility for protecting Lebanon especially that Israel occupies the Shabaa Farms, detains Lebanese resistance fighters and threatens the country.

Welch reiterated Washington's position on Hizbullah, saying the Shiite party is considered "terrorist" under American law. "It receives foreign funding and it tends to respond to foreign guidance," he said.

The U.S. official said Washington objected to comments by some Lebanese politicians that have justified Hizbullah's "terrorist actions" committed in the past, such as the taking of hostages. Asked if he was referring to Aoun, Welch said, "yes." Aoun reportedly had said that Hizbullah and the FPM were the only two parties in Lebanon who were not involved in mass murders during the country's 1975-1990 year civil war.

"American citizens have suffered at the hands of this organization (Hizbullah) and that's why we consider it a terrorist organization, and there is no reason in our view why there should be any excuse or any loophole for them to change their behavior and disarm, as according to the rules of the international community as expressed in 1559," said Welch.

Welch, who visited Lebanon last month, said Washington deals with the established institutions of the government. "And we ask them to respect the will of the international community." He said the U.S. administration understands the need for the Lebanese to have a dialogue with Hizbullah, but he stressed that such a dialogue should be directed toward the implementation of UN Resolution 1559.
Posted by:Captain America

#7  A more simple intrepretation i:

(1) There is no democratic Lebanese government separate and apart from Hezbo, and

(2) The Lebanese PM and other elected officals govern with a Hezbo gun to their heads.

President Bush and Condi continue to clinge to not wanting to damage the Lebanese government. But the Lebanese government per se doesn't exist anymore.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-07-31 12:36  

#6  Have we heard anything about/from this guy lately?
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-07-31 10:11  

#5  What part of the following isn't true?

A majority of Lebanese, like a majority of Palestinians, back terrorist violence under a shield of terminology, "resistance". While Hezbollah politicians are active in Lebanese government, Hezbollah militants are launching missiles into Israel, intentionally killing Israeli civilians. The Lebanese people put Hezbollah reps in positions of government power to best represent their desires.

The government of Lebanon is responsible for its actions as the one government of the people of Lebanon. Resolution 1559 requires that the government of Lebanon disarm armed militias, including Hezbollah. The Lebanese government has not disarmed them. The Lebanese government is shielded from responsibility for launching a war against Israeli civilians through the division of Hezbollah into militant and political wings.
Posted by: Jules in the Hinterlands   2006-07-31 09:56  

#4  We should have responded back in 1983 when a suicide bomber (taking direction from Iran) murdered 241 Marines in Beirut. Should have gotten payback. Hizballah needs to be disarmed (UN Resolution 1559) or destroyed. They are a danger to the world. If Iran builds an A-Bomb, Hizballah will even become more dangerous. Anything short of disarming or destruction will be viewed as some kind of victory in the weird world of islamofacists.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-07-31 07:27  

#3  put simply Hezballah has terrorized Lebanon
Posted by: mhw   2006-07-31 05:05  

#2  Just remember, Lebies, Syrians, Non-Iranian Shias and Sunnis, etal. any defeat or destruction of Israel does NOT mean [post-Israel]Radical Iran = Radical Shias in Radic Iran will treat youse as equals, brothers, or fairly. BE CAREFUL WHAT YOUSE ASK = FIGHT FOR, BECUZ YOU JUST MIGHT GET IT.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-07-31 02:49  

#1  Gen Michel Aoun, back in the day, was anti-Syrian. He exiled to France and came back after the Cedar Revolution as a complete Syrian tool.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-07-31 01:09  

00:00