You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Bangladesh
B'desh objects India's move to oil exploration in Bay of Bengal
2006-07-01
Bangladesh Prime Minister Begum Khaleda Zia has told the Jatiya Sangsad that Bangladesh had already lodged a strong protest against India's move for inviting tenders to explore oil and gas in the undemarcated areas in the Bay of Bengal.

Replying to a question from treasury bench member, Begum Zia, Wednesday, stressed that the two countries should immediately resolve some issues, which were not yet settled. However, she said, cooperation in the fields of trade and commerce, education, culture and other sectors have increased between the two countries, Bangladesh Observer reported from Dhaka. "Dhaka feels that these issues should be resolved through discussion," Begum Zia said, adding that the Bangladesh government had held discussion with India, especially on the process to demarcate the land border, creating peaceful atmosphere along the border areas, stop killing of innocent Bangladesh nationals in the border and stopping the push-in of Bengali speaking Indians to Bangladesh.

Besides, she said, different activities are on to reduce the existing huge trade imbalance between the two countries.

The Indian government was informed of Bangladesh's grave concern about the proposed river-linking through diplomatic note and the matter was raised at the India-Bangladesh joint river commission meeting, she added. In this connection, the Prime Minister referred to her visit to India and said that she had very fruitful discussions on bilateral matters with her Indian counterpart Manmohan Singh in an atmosphere of cordiality and friendship. "I have informed matters related to Bangladesh interests to Indian Premier and sought his sincere cooperation," she said.

Begum Zia also said that a favorable atmosphere was created after her visit to India for holding discussions on various bilateral issues between the two countries. She expressed her belief that the two countries would utilize this favorable atmosphere for further strengthening the friendly relations between them.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  Another example is the trans asian highway system which would link the various nations.
It would radically uplift the entire region via the trade potential.
Bangladesh did not join because it "did not wish to be a transit corridor for India".
India will instead connect to the grid via Burma, going the long way around via the north east states.


Posted by: john   2006-07-01 17:06  

#4  This is so stupid. They could joint venture the disputed areas and share the wealth. Thanks, John for the enlightening information. Here is a golden chance for Bangladesh to climb out of the poverty that they are in, and they dig their hole deeper. Shows you what happens when you mix Islam with well waters full of arsenic.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-07-01 12:34  

#3  stopping the push-in of Bengali speaking Indians to Bangladesh.

This refers to the Indian attempts to deport some of the estimated twenty million illegal Bangladeshi immigrants living in India.

According to Bangladesh, there are no illegals in India.

Posted by: john   2006-07-01 08:05  

#2  There are several portions of the Indo-Bangla border that have not been permanently demarcated.
On land, this includes enclaves of each other's territory, completely surrounded by either India or Bangladesh.
At sea, the two countries have to settle maritime boundaries according to UN law of the sea treaty.

There is an almost reflexive negative Bangladesh response to any moves that would benefit India, even if Bangladesh itself would benefit enormously.

Thus having a settled boundary (and bear in mind that India is the bigger state territorially so its share of the Bay of Bengal would be larger) would benefit India's fisheries, its oil and gas etc and so is opposed. Better the issue be unsettled than India benefit.

Unocal left Bangladesh in frustration because it would not allow development of its gas reserves because the potential buyer of gas would be India.
Better the gas stay in the ground than it be used by India.

The Indian firm Tata, wanted to invest ten billion dollars in iron ore mining and steel production with downstream facilities.
This has gotten nowehere because Tata is an Indian firm.

Of course, the gas sales and the steel plants could radically improve the Bangladesh economy, but because it could benefit India as well, it is opposed.

Both main political parties in Bangladesh campaign on anti-India platforms, each accusing the other of being subservient to Indian interests.

I suspect that islam plays a great role here.
Muslim "honor and dignity" is offended by the subservient role to the "hindoo kaffirs"
Posted by: john   2006-07-01 08:02  

#1  John, can you clarify?
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-07-01 06:17  

00:00