You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Accepts Parts of Western Nuke Offer
2006-06-12
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran said Sunday that it accepted some parts of a Western offer aimed at getting Tehran to drop its nuclear program, but it rejected others while calling the central point ambiguous.
It's perfectly clear, you just don't like it.
Iran said the key issue of uranium enrichment needed clarification. Although the government did not give specifics, the comments were the first time Iran has said directly that it rejects or accepts parts of the package.

Top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani said Iran would reject the package outright if Western powers threatened the Islamic republic with sanctions in the nuclear standoff. The package, presented by permanent Security Council members the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain, plus Germany, contains a series of incentives for Iran to suspend uranium enrichment, which would allow negotiations over its nuclear ambitions. The incentives include promises that the United States and Europe will provide Iran nuclear technology and that Washington will join direct talks with Tehran.

Iran has not responded to the offer, and it underlined Sunday that it would not be rushed. Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi insisted Iran was not stalling over the package and would take "as long as is necessary" to study it.
Just don't test Dubya's patience ...
He told a press conference the package includes "points which are acceptable. There are points which are ambiguous. There are points that should be strengthened, and points that we believe should not exist."

Larijani said the offer of nuclear technology was a "positive point" but that "there are also points that are unclear, such as the uranium enrichment program." "This has not been made clear yet to Iran, so these are things where the finishing touches must be made," he told reporters in Cairo, Egypt, after talks with President Hosni Mubarak and Arab League chief Amr Moussa.

He said the package, as presented to Iran, did not contain any threats of penalties. The package drops demands for an all-out scrapping of enrichment, instead asking Iran to suspend such activity during the duration of any negotiations.

In two position papers shown to the AP, the United States and Europe were lobbying hard for support of the package from members of the 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency before a Monday meeting of the body. "We are ... encouraging all board members to make firm statements to call on Iran" to negotiate on the six-power offer, the U.S. position paper said.

If Tehran declines, the text warned that the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany "have agreed to pursue measures, including at the U.N. Security Council, (to) pressure the Iranian regime to change course." The other text, issued by Britain, France and Germany, also warned that if Iran remains defiant, "the Security Council will have no choice but to increase the pressure on Iran."
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Iran accepts in part what Dubya will not accept in the whole, Iran does what Dubya will not tolerate, ....... etc. UNLESS SOMEONE BLINKS, NO DEAL/COMPROMISE IS LIKELY - buy that popcorn, Galz and Gentz.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-06-12 23:31  

#8  Not curious at all. The world trusts that we will handle it, garnering hatred from those who are stymied, while they earn good will by having opposed us. It doesn't work that way with such people, of course, but they refuse to see the reality that conflicts from their "men of the world" self image.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-06-12 22:13  

#7  Is it better to bomb Iran back to the stone age during the summer, when it's too hot for them to be effective at anything during the day?
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2006-06-12 09:45  

#6  Iran is trying to maintain control of the dialogue.
Like a really bad car salesman.
Nothing more.
It's an arab thing, swinging your d*ck around even as the bombs are whistling in on you.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-06-12 09:29  

#5  Iran is playing rope-a-dope with us being the dope.
Posted by: Spot   2006-06-12 08:29  

#4  The whole purpose for this offer is to stop Iran from further enrichment, yet Iran accelerates enrichment and states that they will not be rushed. We know what they are up to, therefore, Bush has no alternative but to squash them.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-06-12 07:32  

#3  It's curious, I think. Everyone knows this is a farce, just as it was obvious 2 yrs ago the EU3 "negotiations" were a farce. The UNSC bit will be a farce. Any and all sanctions will be a farce. In fact, almost all activities (I presume there must be an exception out there somewhere) that carry the label "diplomatic" are farcical.

Apply the technologies available, shed this ancient and pathetic approach to international relations. I know there is occasionally value in slowing things down, letting the "sides" simmer a bit, but this is absurd in the extreme. And everyone on the planet knows it.

With regard to Iran, it's clearly time to cut to the chase.
Posted by: flyover   2006-06-12 06:11  

#2  Ooh, increase the pressure. How terrifying.
Posted by: JSU   2006-06-12 03:27  

#1  
Love the house; hate the mortgage!
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2006-06-12 00:32  

00:00