You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
About 170 Washington Post staff take buyouts
2006-06-02
About 70 reporters, editors, photographers and newsroom administrators have taken early retirement offers from The Washington Post Co. amid declining circulation at its flagship newspaper. About 100 employees outside the newsroom, such as those in The Washington Post's pressrooms or on the advertising staff, also took the offer, The Post announced in Thursday's editions.

Staffers age 54 and older with 10 years of service were eligible to receive up to two years of full-time pay and benefits in exchange for leaving the newspaper before retirement age. Many have left The Post or will exit this week; others will stay on for a few months. The deadline for taking the early retirement offer was Tuesday, but those who took it have a week to change their minds.

Circulation at The Washington Post and most daily newspapers has decreased in recent years as readers turn to television and the Internet for news. Daily circulation at The Post peaked at 832,232 in 1993. The Post's daily circulation for the first three months of this year averaged 690,700, the company reported last month. “Our newsroom has grown a lot over a number of years, in both size of staff and other expenses,” said Post executive editor Leonard Downie Jr. “And as circulation has declined some and advertising revenue has leveled off at the moment, and we continue to have to pay higher costs for travel and those sorts of things and continue to give raises to members of our staff, we had to find some way to reduce the overall size of the newsroom.”

Several other newspapers are using buyouts or layoffs to cut costs. The New York Times Co. is cutting 700 company-wide jobs. Tribune Co., which publishes 11 newspapers including the Los Angeles Times, said last week that it would use layoffs to cut costs. Last year, Tribune newspapers eliminated 185 positions through buyouts and layoffs.

This is The Post's second round of buyouts in the past three years, the newspaper reported. In 2003, 54 staff members age 55 and older took the offer, but many were offered contracts to work part of the year without benefits. The age was lowered to 54 this time, and fewer contracts were offered.
Posted by:Sniting Chereck4226

#12  The five "W"'s are: who, what, where, when and why.

Long forgotten, it seems. Or, transmutated into a version of opinion of the requisites rather than the requisites themselves. Trend is to report what one is told. Report gossip, like Hollywood. That's "reportage" in the picayune market economy of media.

It ain't News.
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-06-02 22:02  

#11  Okay, now we have 1,000. Do I hear 2,000?
Posted by: Throluting Thravimble3768   2006-06-02 14:22  

#10  Obviously I tell that one too often.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-06-02 14:22  

#9  Reminds me of the old lawyer joke:
Question: "What do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of the Atlantic?"
Answer: "A good start."
Posted by: Darrell   2006-06-02 14:21  

#8  Reminds me of the old lawyer joke:
Question: "What do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of the Atlantic?"
Answer: "A good start."
Posted by: Darrell   2006-06-02 14:20  

#7  now the guy that checks for accuracy in reporting in the WAPO will be laid off. Won't Dana Milbank be happy?
Posted by: Frank G   2006-06-02 13:25  

#6  The Washington Post is in decline.
THE WASHINGTON POST IS IN DECLINE.
Sometimes the small pleasures of life make a day great.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-06-02 12:42  

#5  Don't offer buyouts to the leftists at WaPo. We wouldn't want WaPo to rid themselves of the reason for the lines.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-06-02 10:39  

#4  ZF - and how many new jobs were created by WALMART in the past year [particularly for those with high school level education] and how many has WAPO created?

Hopefully, journalism like many of its fellow soft degree programs will soon swell the ranks of embittered retail clerks across America. Time that information 'reporting' get back to the old standards of a trade.
Posted by: Shinemp Ebbitch6305   2006-06-02 09:32  

#3  S: Try just reportin' the news, rather than makin' the news, and see if that makes a difference in your business.

I don't think that's the problem - they're just losing subscribers from the availability of free and timely news on the internet. They're also losing advertising because sellers are moving to the web to sell their stuff.

The real irony is that the liberal media are always decrying the effect of profit-hungry corporate drones on employment. They lay into Wal Mart for causing jobs to be lost, even though Wal Mart makes a 5% profit. WPO made an 8% profit in the most recent quarter, and it's laying off people. When liberals have money at stake, they'll do whatever they need to hang on to that money, but they expect other people to make sacrifices for the common good.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-06-02 08:21  

#2  Sherry you beat me to it. what she said.
Posted by: Jan   2006-06-02 04:40  

#1  Try just reportin' the news, rather than makin' the news, and see if that makes a difference in your business. Just guessin'... just sayin'... but I do think, when you begin to understand, "cause and effect," you might witness a bit of a difference in your five year business plan. And your stockholders might be a little happier.

Keep doing those early buy-out. They always work.

NOT.....

How about a six month pilot program? For six months, report the news. Strike out every word, every phrase that hints of bias. Bleed and lead with it, as you bleed your heart in going against that, "If it bleeds, it leads."

Just report. As I learned about the characteristics of writing a news report.... Who, What, When, When and How.

And I learned that in 7th.... many, many, many years ago.. Try it. You might like the results.
Posted by: Sherry   2006-06-02 01:03  

00:00