You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Soddies leading the fight against UK in Basra
2006-06-01
Foreign terrorists, led by fighters from Saudi Arabia, are behind an upsurge in attacks against British troops in Basra, military sources said yesterday. The Saudi influence on terrorism in Shia-dominated Basra has not been previously reported but has caused concern among military commanders because of their training, technology and finance.

Although the majority of Saudi Arabians are Sunni, the minority Shia have taken part in terrorist attacks.

Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, admitted that a recent surge in violence was a cause of "major concern". Dozens of soldiers have been targeted by advanced "improvised explosive devices" (IED) that the Army has been unable to disable or jam.

Morale is also being affected by the continual danger, with older soldiers saying the apprehension is similar to that experienced on the streets of Northern Ireland in the 70s and early 80s. "People are dying and morale is being affected by it," said an officer operating in Iraq. "The perception is that attacks are becoming more lethal and better targeted and the delivery process is more effective. There is a definite sense that we are still making progress but because there is no real defence against IEDs people are feeling a bit glummer."

Commanders are concerned that Saudi and other foreign fighters are co-ordinating the attacks in a "consensual environment", in which the locals will not tell the military where roadside bombs have been planted. "The concern is that support for our presence is going down," a defence source said. There is also a strong belief, particularly among the Americans, that Iran is continuing to ferry bombs to Baghdad via Basra.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#3  Hear, hear Grom
Posted by: 6   2006-06-01 16:41  

#2  Not to be rude about our Brit friends, but they've had their head in the sand about Iran in that region for some time. Their policies have benefits, but also costs and now the time has come to pay those costs.

The notion that it's the Soddis is questionable, at best. Why not blame the Kuwaitis? From purely a geographic and economic point of view, they're equally likely. Realisticly, it's Iran and a few odds and sods.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-06-01 15:01  

#1  Commanders are concerned that Saudi and other foreign fighters are co-ordinating the attacks in a "consensual environment", in which the locals will not tell the military where roadside bombs have been planted.

One must keep things like this in mind, when judging Haditha
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-06-01 11:32  

00:00