You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Michael Moore sued by Vet
2006-05-31
double-amputee Iraq-war vet is suing Michael Moore for $85 million, claiming the portly peacenik recycled an old interview and used it out of context to make him appear anti-war in "Fahrenheit 9/11."

Sgt. Peter Damon, 33, who strongly supports America's invasion of Iraq, said he never agreed to be in the 2004 movie, which trashes President Bush.

In the 2003 interview, which he did at Walter Reed Army Hospital for NBC News, he discussed only a new painkiller the military was using on wounded vets.

"They took the clip because it was a gut-wrenching scene," Damon said yesterday. "They sandwiched it in. [Moore] was using me as ammunition."

Damon seems to "voice complaint about the war effort" in the movie, according to the lawsuit.

But what the father of two from Middleborough, Mass., was really talking about was the "excruciating" pain he felt after he lost his arms when a Black Hawk helicopter exploded in front of him.

Damon wasn't expressing any opinion about the war, the suit charges, but rather extolling the drug.

"I just want everybody to know what kind of a guy Michael Moore is, and what kind of film this is," said Damon. He has appeared in two films attacking "Fahrenheit" -"Michael Moore Hates America" and "Fahrenhype 9/11."

In "Fahrenheit 9/11," the bandaged National Guardsman is shown laying on a gurney complaining that he feels like he's "being crushed in a vise. But they [the drugs] do a lot to help it and they take a lot of the edge off it."

His image appears seconds after Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) says, "You know, they say they're not leaving any veterans behind, but they're leaving all kinds of veterans behind."

Damon - the dad of a 8-year-old girl and 4-year-old boy - doesn't come close to feeling that way.

"He couldn't have picked the worst guy to say that about," he told The Post.

"I'm the most fortunate disabled guy. I've even had a house built for me [by a nonprofit group, Home for Our Troops]."

Particularly outrageous to Damon is the fact that Moore never interviewed him or asked his permission to use the old clip.

"I was complaining about the pain I would've been having [if it weren't for the painkiller]," he said.

NBC is named in the suit - which was filed in Suffolk County, Mass., on Friday - along with Harvey and Robert Weinstein, Miramax Corp., Lions Gate Films and other production companies involved with the picture.

Newsman Brian Williams ends the NBC clip by adding, "These men, with catastrophic wounds are . . . completely behind the war effort," according to the lawsuit.

That part, which wasn't shown in the Moore movie, is a far more accurate depiction of Damon's feelings, he said.

Lawyer Dennis Lynch said he took the case last year and they held off filing the lawsuit in a bid to settle the matter.

"We attempted to resolve the situation amicably with Mr. Moore [for a year] but he refused," he said.

Damon is asking for up to $75 million because of "loss of reputation, emotional distress, embarrassment, and personal humiliation."

In addition, his wife is suing for another $10 million because of the "mental distress and anguish suffered by her spouse."

Spokeswomen for NBC and Harvey and Robert Weinstein would not comment because they haven't seen the suit. Lions Gate doesn't comment on pending litigation, a rep said.

Michael Moore and Miramax reps didn't return calls for comment.

Go get him! Nail his fat, lying ass to the wall!
Posted by:Cloluque Clort1806

#19  i reely do lov lawwyers
Posted by: RD   2006-05-31 21:14  

#18  Try mailto:phil@cox.net or mailto:phil-at-cox.spam... if you want to fool the spam email harvestors.
Posted by: ed   2006-05-31 20:25  

#17  cingold - Here's my favorite lawyer joke - and I read it here on Rantburg a long long time ago, though I can't recall who posted it... apologies if you've already seen it.

Did you hear that they're using lawyers instead of little white mice in lab experiments these days?

There are 3 reasons:
1) There are more of them
2) You don't become emotionally attached to them
3) There are some things little white mice just won't do

:) I used to work with lots of lawyers from both sides. We knew who the good guys were - and who the scumballs were. The good ones would even hang at the cop bars now and then, whether they were prosecutors or defence types. The PD's were usually goofballs.
Posted by: Chang Ominesing2659   2006-05-31 20:18  

#16  I don't know why, but one day they decided all customers of residential service couldn't use cox-internet.com any more and had to use cox.net.

The link isn't meant to go anywhere, that's why it's spelled out. I wish I had a good solution to that.
Posted by: Phil   2006-05-31 20:03  

#15  Phil,

the link for your email appears broken on that site. It just bounces back to the main web page. Why'd Cox make you change it?
Posted by: cingold   2006-05-31 19:09  

#14  BTW, I don't know if I mentioned it earlier, but I was looking for ex-lib; my updated email address is on the website; could you have her drop me a note?
Posted by: Phil   2006-05-31 19:03  

#13  One of my most favorite lawyer jokes goes something like this:
One lawyer was overheard outside the courthouse remarking to another lawyer. "Don't you just hate," he said, "the 90% of all lawyers that give the other 10% of us a bad name?"
Posted by: cingold   2006-05-31 18:56  

#12  I hope this guy is successful and he is a true hero.

I still think lawyers and the politicians they fund (also mostly lawyers) are the problem not the solution.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-05-31 18:43  

#11  But Lardo will have more numerous and higly paid lawyers than Sgt. Damon. So lawyers on balance are still the servants of Beelzebub. Pistols at 10 paces and our interest is piqued. Another possibility:
Moore held under boiling water for 10 minutes. If still with us, then judgement for the defendant.
Posted by: ed   2006-05-31 18:17  

#10  Cingold, this guy wins the case for Damon and I personally will swear off snarky lawyer comments for a year!
Posted by: lotp   2006-05-31 17:26  

#9  BTW Cingold, I hate you, but is my retainer still current?
Posted by: 6   2006-05-31 17:23  

#8  Cingold - we hate all attorneys...except our own, of course, who are fine upstanding professionals :-)

kinda like the teachers union - assholes all! Except the teacher who teaches our kid, love em!
Posted by: Frank G   2006-05-31 17:02  

#7  Noted cingold. However, my sister is a lawyer.... and I still don't trust you guys. ;)
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-05-31 17:02  

#6  
A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT
As you extol this positive aspect of suing a scumbag (and I can think of few others more worthy of being sued than Moore), remember the profession that makes it all possible: LAWYERS, and in particular: TRIAL LAWYERS

I know, I know, the word "lawyer" is a virtual four letter word around here, but even we trial lawyers have our uses. We even get honorable mention in the VI Amendment of the Bill of Rights, in the context of legal representation for persons accused of committing crimes (NOTE: criminal defense attorneys often go on to represent Plaintiffs, prosecutors often go on to represent civil Defendants, IDKY). And the backbone of the legal system, the jury (who we lawyers ever attempt to manipulate and sway), gets mentioned in the Constitution (art. III, sec. 2), and in the V, VI, and VII Amendments of the Bill of Rights.

I guess all IÂ’m really trying to say <*wipes emotional tear from eye*> is the next time some scumbag lawyer screws up the reputation of the rest of us attorneys, try to think back to this tender moment when some lawyer went after a piece of Mr. Moore.
Posted by: cingold   2006-05-31 16:31  

#5  He's a wealthy man if I'm on the jury.
Posted by: Penguin   2006-05-31 16:22  

#4  http://www.moorewatch.com/
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-05-31 15:34  

#3  Triple the damages.
Posted by: ed   2006-05-31 15:28  

#2  Not the first time beached-whaleman has been sued... note also he had been sued too by a woman, last year I think, again for editing her interview, presenting her like a bigot, but I can't find the article here, though I believe I might have posted it.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-05-31 15:25  

#1  God bless him. Hope he takes that lying America hating propagandist for all he can.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-05-31 15:03  

00:00