Submit your comments on this article | ||||
India-Pakistan | ||||
A Taliban Comeback? | ||||
2006-05-30 | ||||
As unprecedented Taliban violence sweeps across southern Afghanistan, four players in the region – Afghanistan, Pakistan, the US and NATO – are locked in a tense standoff rather than cooperating to defeat the terrorists. At stake is the future survival of Afghanistan’s moderate government and stability in Pakistan. To prop up Afghanistan and combat the Taliban, the US and NATO may have to make major concessions to Pakistan’s military regime, but any concessions would anger the Afghans, encourage the extremists and allow the unpopular military to dominate Pakistan’s political scene for another five years. More than 200 people were killed and hundreds wounded in fierce fighting that swept four provinces in southern Afghanistan starting May 18 and continued for the next three days. It was the worst bout of violence since the defeat of the Taliban in December 2001 and the opening shots in a promised Taliban offensive this summer to deter some 9,000 NATO troops from deploying in southern Afghanistan.
| ||||
Posted by:john |
#2 above comment in response to It's a parade ground army, good for impressing the girlies and oppressing the citizenry if they're unarmed, but not much else. |
Posted by: john 2006-05-30 08:19 |
#1 I would disagree. While the Pak army's fighting effectiveness has been degraded by the involvement of the officer corps in civilian affairs (corruption and other ills), they remain quite an effective and ruthless fighting force. Those killed in Waziristan are paramilitary troops, associated with the army and local amry units (non-Punjabi) recruited from the local population. Neither group is especially well equippped or trained. There is a lack of will. A real move against these groups would entail destruction of Pak's jihadi infrastructure, needed for reasserting control in Afghanistan and grabbing Kashmir from India. |
Posted by: john 2006-05-30 08:18 |