You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
No military offensive against Iran: Aziz
2006-05-25
Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz said on Wednesday that dialogue and not force remained the key to resolving IranÂ’s nuclear standoff with the West, warning that any military offensive against Tehran would destabilise the entire region.
The only region more unstable than the Middle East to include Iran is maybe the Horn of Africa, and for much the same reason: when the civilized world attempts to conduct "dialogue" with the local Fearless Leaders, they're treated to the sight of the nutcase states' negotiators spewing spittle, jumping up and down, rolling their eyes, claiming their "legitimate rights," having their heads spin around 360 degrees, and projectile vomiting. Sorry, but that's not "dialogue." It's more like possession by demons.
Aziz made the comments while talking to visiting Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, who had called on him at Prime Minister House. The two discussed bilateral relations, regional developments and the Iranian nuclear row.
"See that guy over there? Betcha I can hit him with a projectile vomit from here!"
"Go on! That's at least 200 feet!"
"Hrrrrrralph!"
"Dang! You did it! Here! Lemme give it a try. We've got negotiations with India coming up on Kashmir!"
Aziz reiterated PakistanÂ’s stance that conflict resolution had to take the form of dialogue, not force, adding that there was no room for the use of force in the 21st century.
Jihad, yes. The use of force by the West, no.
Pakistan, he said, wanted the Iranian nuclear issue to be resolved through negotiation.
With whom? We've let the Marshmallow People talk to them continuously for the past three years with no results except those noted above.
The prime minister said that Pakistan was “making headway” in boosting bilateral relations with Iran, stressing that Islamabad was keen to take the issue of gas imports with Tehran to a higher level. The Iranian foreign minister said that Pakistan and Iran enjoyed a strong bond of friendship, which was set to strengthen with the passage of time.
Since they're two peas in an Islamic pod.
He also briefed Aziz on the current situation regarding the Iranian nuclear programme. Mottaki had arrived in Islamabad early on Wednesday to represent Tehran in a two-day meeting of the Joint Economic Commission (JEC), which he was due to co-chair, scheduled to begin later on Wednesday. It was expected that measures aimed at boosting bilateral trade from US $400 million to one billion dollars annually would top the JEC agenda.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Perv has to presume that the Paki street would react badly to a US invasion of Iran. That could threaten his regime, or even his life.

Even IF that were not the case, the Paki street would certainly react VERY badly to any statement from him that even hinted at supporting military action against Iran.

Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-05-25 11:07  

#4  State sponsored jihad and state sanctioned terrorism are violence if anyone from the "middle east" are paying attention.

16th, 20th, or 21st century you don't get away with these acts for long before someone smacks you down. Some people just need to be thankful the TRANZIs and "soft power" wankers have held what is on it's inevitable way back as long as they have.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-05-25 04:06  

#3  Let's just F*ckin nuke these guys and assume our role as world's policeman. Bitch slap russia, remind china who their biggest trade partner is, crush Sudan with one mighty blow, give Syria a look that says "don't even think about it" , and call up Pakistan and tell them to have OBL ready to go in 24 hours or they are out in the cold. That should just about do it. And if anybody objects, give em something to cry about.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-05-25 01:22  

#2  AFRICA's Rogues will most likely be left to Dubya's successor - the glitch/snafu for the Dems and any DemoLeft POTUS is that their usual SPEND SPEND SPEND method is no longer sufficient for the post-9-11 world. Radical Islam wants and prefers a US Dem POTUS becuz the likelihood of unilateral Amer concession, appeasement, and isolationism-centric eventual US defeat, iff not destruction, is far higher than for any GOP POTUS. AMERICA AND BY EXTENS THE DEMOCRATIC-CAPITALIST WEST IS UP AGAINST A COVERT-OVERT GRAND ALLIANCE OF PAN-SOCIALIST ENEMIES HELL-BENT DEDICATED TO THE DEFEAT AND DESTRUCTION OF AMER-WEST, AND NO AMOUNT OF DEMOCRAT DEFICIT SPENDING CONCESSION, AND APPEASEMENT, EVEN FOR OWG, IS GONNA SUFFICE. ARMISTICE > KILL US LATER, NOT IMMEDIATELY OR SOONER.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-05-25 01:12  

#1  Move aside boys, Uncle Sam is rolling up his sleeves to do some serious ass pounding. No moolah nukes.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-05-25 00:37  

00:00