You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Israel Seeks Cruise Missiles
2006-05-24
Israel has speeded up efforts to develop long-range cruise missiles of a type that could be used should the Jewish state try to strike at Iran's nuclear facilities, security sources said yesterday. Israel sent warplanes to destroy Iraq's main atomic reactor at Osiraq in 1981 and has not ruled out similar action to prevent its archfoe from getting the bomb should US-led diplomatic pressure on Tehran fail. The greater ranges to Iran's nuclear facilities might make cruise missiles more practical than planes, but the United States has rebuffed past Israeli requests to buy them. Cruise missiles are programmed to seek out and hit distant targets, flying low to avoid radar. But only the United States and Russia are known to have mastered all aspects of production.
Posted by:Fred

#20  "...the United States has rebuffed past Israeli requests to buy them..."
Oh no, friend, we will not accept payment. Just take what you need.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-05-24 21:06  

#19  sign them: "Haram THIS, goatf*ckers!"
Posted by: Ptah   2006-05-24 18:50  

#18  "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb" gives details of the V-1's construction. Any shop that can bend sheet metal into brake boxes, do basic radiator repair, and handles diesel engines can build a V-1.
Plus to greatly increase the range is not that difficult since much of the range restriction was due to actuator surface controls and the design of same, because of the weight and wind resistance involved.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-05-24 18:44  

#17  Actually, cruise missiles are not that hard to build : the Nazis had them in WWII, and did a lot of damage to Great Britain with them. What is difficult is getting the carbon-fibre bodies, the terrain-following guidance and mapping, and the ability to do pop-up launching. However, the Israelis have the experience with their anti-ship missiles, the Popeye missile program, and some others that are not generally talked about. If they really want them, they can build them -- hugely expensive missile series since they would not be able to do a 1000 missile run like we do in the US.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-05-24 18:35  

#16  Perhaps we could misplace a few of our own... inventory errors do happen... or we could just accidentaly leave a copy of the plans at an Israeli embasy.
Posted by: bool   2006-05-24 15:24  

#15  #9 Darth - Now, that's downright inhospitable. We should never refuse to take back a present if the recipient is displeased.

How about labeling them, "Return if dissatisified - if you can"? ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-05-24 14:09  

#14  Israel Seeks Cruise Missiles...Yeled Gadol or Yeled Katan...

how 'bout the Twelfth Imami?

the irony loving Mullahs might appreciate it.
Posted by: the Twelfth Imami   2006-05-24 12:47  

#13  only the United States and Russia are known to have mastered all aspects of production.

So don't come to us when MM start going boom.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-05-24 12:36  

#12  I vote for Timur Lang.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-05-24 12:35  

#11  Ahhh, so that's what Turkey's top secret space program is for--launching Iranian cruise missiles. How do we know only the US and Russia have mastered production? Same way we knew Iran was years away from even enriching uranium?
Posted by: Danielle   2006-05-24 12:29  

#10  Shouldn't we write something like 'Duck' or 'Incoming' on them ?
Posted by: wxjames   2006-05-24 10:55  

#9  Well, to avoid diplomatic SNAFUs, we could deliver them for Israel. We could send them to Iran... with "Do not return to sender".
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-05-24 09:35  

#8  Or "Mahdi This!"
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-05-24 08:58  

#7  I'd designate them "shutthehellup"
Posted by: Frank G   2006-05-24 08:53  

#6  Yeah, but wouldn't "Mollahs smasher" or something be an even better name for export models?
Posted by: anonymous5089   2006-05-24 08:18  

#5  I am impressed, Besoeker -- you are a man of surprising talents. Only it would be Yeled Gadol or Yeled Katan... the adjective goes after the noun. For the non-linguists, yeled means boy in Hebrew; gadol is big, katan is little.

Shalom! y'all ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-05-24 08:15  

#4  Some suggested names for the the IS cruise missiles:

Gadolv Yeled and Katan Yeled.... only seems appropriate.
Posted by: Besoeker   2006-05-24 07:47  

#3  Heh, I thought of that guy immediately as well Phil.

And if that link doesn't get RB on the official CIA Open Source watch list nothing will. ;)
Posted by: AzCat   2006-05-24 00:28  

#2  I have a Tom Cruise missile they could have...
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-05-24 00:09  

#1  But only the United States and Russia are known to have mastered all aspects of production.

And that New Zealand bloke who built one in his shed.

Posted by: phil_b   2006-05-24 00:09  

00:00