You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
20 killed in Afghanistan
2006-05-24
Fresh Pakistani insurgent attacks across Afghanistan claimed nearly 20 more lives, officials said on Tuesday, adding to the death toll of around 300 killed in some of the heaviest fighting since the fall of the Taliban.
Many of the 300 have been Pakistanis Taliban, though, so do they count?
Three policemen and 12 Taliban were killed when a convoy carrying a deputy provincial governor and a police chief came under attack in the south while three health workers and their driver died in a roadside bombing here. In another incident a doctor, two nurses and their driver were killed on Monday when a remote-controlled bomb exploded under their vehicle, officials said.
Docs and nurses, that's the kind of target the Talibs favor, at least when they can't find a girls' school.
Later, Afghan President Hamid Karzai ordered an investigation into the US airstrikes on a small village that killed at least 16 civilians and asked to meet with the US commander of forces in Afghanistan. The president's office said that Karzai expressed "concern at the coalition forces' decision to bomb civilian areas" but also strongly condemned the "terrorists' act of cowardice" to use civilians as human shields.
Can't have it both ways, Hamid.
Posted by:Fred

#4  It is really starting to look like the spring offensive the Taliban have professed is becomming a reality. What the Taliban left out was their offensive was not against us, but in flooding allah with fools looking for virgins.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-05-24 14:52  

#3  Some details left out in Press accounts:
StrategyPage May 21, 2006: Coalition forces found that about a hundred Taliban gunmen were staying at a religious school near Kandahar in southern Afghanistan. Smart bombs hit the school in the middle of the night, but several dozen of the Taliban fled to nearby homes. As Afghan and Coalition forces closed in, the surviving Taliban fired back from nearby homes. So smart bombs were used on the homes as well, which killed about 16 civilians and wounded another twenty. Over 80 Taliban were killed, with no Afghan army or Coalition dead. The Taliban promptly spun their use of civilian homes, as human shields, as a Coalition atrocity.

Also, sounds like the bombs used on the madrassa were not big enough or could have used programmable delay fuses.
Posted by: ed   2006-05-24 10:00  

#2  It is nice that Prez Karzai accused the Taliban of using human shields.

This is a first, or nearly a first. In the I/P conflict, neither Abbas nor any of the other so-called moderates nor the Human Rights NGOs nor the UN have made a similar pronouncement.

Maybe I'm being too semantic but I see this acknowledgement of the human shields crime as a big deal.
Posted by: mhw   2006-05-24 09:44  

#1  yes, he can. For one expressing concern is not condemnation. To look back at Israel, the IDF, when targeting terrorists, balances the number and value of the terrorists vs the likelihood and number of civilian casualties, and the availability and danger of alternate ways of getting the terrs (vs aerial bombing) and issues of timing. Hamid may just want to check that such balancing is being done appropriately by coalition forces in Afghanistan. Its his country after all, and he must answer to its voters, and must ensure that the campaign against the terrorists doesnt weaken support for the new regime.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-05-24 09:20  

00:00