You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
SEC's "Katie Couric" salary clause draws fire
2006-05-12
Squeal, piggies.
Hollywood doesn't blink at paying top dollar for the right actor in a movie deal, but a federal proposal for media companies to reveal their stars' salaries has studios crying "cut!" CBS Corp., Walt Disney Co. and Viacom Inc. are among the media companies asking the Securities and Exchange Commission to drop a proposal that would require them to tell the world how much they pay their top-earning non-executives such as actors and TV news anchors.
Every other industry is required by the media to disclose its salary structures; every time they try to weasel out of such disclosures they are hounded by Dateline NBC, 20/20, and 60 Minutes and accused of coverups.
The entertainment industry is abuzz over the so-called "Katie Couric" clause in a broad SEC plan for publicly traded companies to give shareholders more information about multimillion-dollar salaries. The designation comes from "Today" show co-host Couric, who is leaving NBC at the end of May to join CBS as anchor and managing editor of "The CBS Evening News With Katie Couric" for a reported salary of $15 million over five years. The SEC proposal -- aimed mainly at prying loose more information on the pay of top corporate officers -- also would force companies to disclose salary figures for up to three workers whose compensation exceeds that of its top executives. Companies protesting the SEC plan, which also include DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc., and News Corp., insist that the salary structure for high-paid talent is too complex and irrelevant to shareholders. The new rule also might scare away high-profile individuals who prefer to keep their financial terms private, the companies say.
"Our salaries are ever so complex, it's a acting thing, you wouldn't understand. Our accounting methods are so obscure that nearly every single accountant and entertainment industry exec should go to jail for at least ten years. Plus, we know better than all of you peasants. Only evil capitalists need to disclose their ill-gotten gains. Us noble socialists are secure in our legitimate rights to privacy and prosperity."
Posted by:Seafarious

#5  they don't want to have to expose all of their dirty laundering.
Posted by: 2b   2006-05-12 23:02  

#4  Winston Groom, the author of Forest Gump, was promised a percentage of the profit from the movie. The movie grossed $677 million. According to Paramount (the studio) - it didn't make any profit.
Posted by: DMFD   2006-05-12 19:19  

#3  Do the same for the recording labels too. That industry's a nest of vampires as well....

Sometimes the best thing is to kick the door down and let in some good old fashoned direct sunlight.



Posted by: CrazyFool   2006-05-12 14:08  

#2  Yes. Shine the bright light of truth on the vampires.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-05-12 13:46  

#1  ..Another VERY good reason why the studios and networks are treating this like the Devil faced with holy water is that it would eventually open up FEDERAL scrutiny into the bizarre bookkeeping practices of most Hollywood studios. Remember Art Buchwald's lawsuit against Paramount saying they had stolen the idea for the Eddie Murphy comedy, Coming To America ? Paramount's official weekly figures said the film totalled $128,113,607 on a production cost of about a tenth of that - but when the judge ruled Paramount guilty and awarded Buchwald a share of the profits, the studio trotted out figures that 'proved' the film never made a dime. That sort of nonsense gets people in other industries put away, and the studios know it.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-05-12 13:40  

00:00