You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Nine Taliban killed in fresh violence
2006-04-30
As the Afghan and US-led coalition forces launched a massive operation in southern Afghanistan, a provincial governor claimed their forces had killed nine Taliban and arrested a dozen in different areas.
Hurray for our guys!
Governor of Afghanistan's troubled Kandahar province Asadullah Khalid said the operation was launched in the Panjwayee and Jarai districts of the province after the insurgents pushed backed by security forces from neighbouring Helmand province, entered Kandahar.
"Dis province is gettin' too hot for us, boyz! Load up! We're headin' for Kandahar!"
Addressing a press conference in the evening, the governor said there were clashes as well as searches in some areas. He said so far a dozen Taliban militants had been arrested and nine killed in fighting. He said only three Afghan security personnel had so far been injured in the firefight with the militants. Both the coalition forces and Afghan national army were jointly conducting the operation, said Khalid. Taliban did not issue any comment about the clashes. The operation had been launched at a time when Taliban have stepped up attacks in three southern provinces, including Kandahar, Zabul and Helmand. All the three provinces have been restive over the past few months.
This is all part of the Taliban spring offensive. They had a press release the other day warning the Brits of what fearsome guerilla fighters they are, but they're just the same Pashtun dumbasses who're giving the Paks so much trouble in Waziristan. Individually they're tough guys, I suppose, but their tough guy "victories" are against poor souls they can kidnap, or against inanimate objects like schools, or against non-combatants like women and kiddies. In real military operations, against real soldiers, they consistently lose.

The Afghan Taliban have ceased to be a problem in themselves. They're merely the extension of the Wazoo problem. Waziristan and Bajaur and parts of Balochistan are where the drivers live for the Taliban on both sides of the border. That makes it as much a problem in international relations as a military problem, so I expect that Afghanistan's problems will continue to grind on at about their present low level until the Pakistan problem's been taken care of, and I have no idea what form that will take at this point.

I believe the Talibs (and their Arab masters) expect the same thing. They see the war against the Taliban as a replay of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, with themselves in the role of the mujaheddin and us in the role of the Russers. They expect a long war, with us taking economic hits and getting tied down in other places, which is why they're so hot on Iraq. Eventually we're supposed to go broke and go home and our government collapse, at which time they expect to go back to beating women with battery cables, enforcing their perverse interpretations of Koranic injunctions, and becoming part of the Caliphate, if not the very center of reborn Islamic glory.

The difference is that we're not the Russers. We're not sending three or four divisions of draftees in to pacify the country; we're sending professionals who know what they're doing and do it well. The home front, for the most part, supports operations in Afghanistan, regardless of their opinion of Iraq.

Just as importantly, the support network that was provided for the mujaheddin in the 1980s isn't there now. There's only a truncated stump. The ISI may want to run a war against us using Afghan proxies, but they've got to be very low key about it, otherwise we'll be down Perv's throat with both feet. Mullah Diesel (Fazl) is a politician now and there's only so much assistance his party can extend without us putting them on the list of terror organizations. Mullah Sandwich (Sami) was been rather skillfully put on the outs with the rest of the fundos. He's close to Haqqani, but he doesn't command the resources for big time support. Nizamuddin Shamzai is dead and his successors don't command the same influence. In Afghanistan, Rasool Sayyaf appears to be coopted by the Karzai government and maneuvered away from the main chance. The Soddy money pipe, while not totally closed off, at least now has a valve in it, so the cash isn't coming quite so fast. The only resource the Talibs really have is the supply of yokels willing to cross the border and kill infidels, who it turns out are better than them at killing people.

The only real hope the Talibs and their Qaeda masters have is for regime change in Pakistan. Zawahiri harps on it regularly. That leaves us with Perv, who isn't going to shut the whole thing down for matters of Strategic Depth™, but who also isn't going to openly support it, and who faces the danger of seeing his Frankenstein's monster bust up his laboratory.
Posted by:Fred

#6  I got dibs on Spin Boldak.
Posted by: RD   2006-04-30 21:32  

#5  Questions for Old Patriot and Fred - if the whole scenario plays out, and Pakistan disappears, how does it do so - in particular, how will the UN treat a completely different rearranging of national borders?

Has this question arising aside from very constrained or somewhat consenting arrangements (such as the old USSR, eastern Europe, Czech/Slovak????)

I guess what I'm getting at is that a dissolution of a UN member state could lead, certainly in a small, and possible a much larger way to the dissolution of the UN itself.

I think that may be one part of the end game, and not an altogether unworthy part at that.
Posted by: Whong Whoting4646   2006-04-30 21:24  

#4  They see the war against the Taliban as a replay of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, with themselves in the role of the mujaheddin and us in the role of the Russers.

Unfortunately for them, they have no one to play the supply role that the US played in that affair. Big damn oversight on their part.
Posted by: BH   2006-04-30 16:06  

#3  Wetworks on Saudi money men is a good start
Posted by: Frank G   2006-04-30 15:30  

#2  In Pak-land and Wazoo, we have the same base situation for Al and the Qs, their cads and lackies, like Afghanistan used to be. It is a delicate and insane dance that we have been doing with Perv, while he carries around the jar of nitroglycerine that is Pakistan. If we maintain the status quo, then it will be a war of attrition against the Talibs and Paks in Wazoo. It will also be a war of attrition against us.

The bottom line is that these bases of operations across the Afghan border need to be destroyed or neutralized. Now how that all ties in with logistics through the NWFP into Afghanistan I do not know, but I imagine that it is a major factor in planning. Regardless, it is time to put these Lions of Islam™ on the defensive and serious hurt.

As is usual in this part of the world, Pakland runs on Saudi money, and others in the NWFP must run on the opium trade. Without Saudi money, Pakland would be a backwater. So interrupting the money flow should be one of our highest priorities.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-04-30 14:39  

#1  Excellent summary, Fred. I'd like to interject a bit of speculation. I think time is running out for both the Talibanis and Perv. I think the patience of high-level decision-makers in Washington has been totally exhausted with both. The next event will be a two-front war between the United States and India on one side, and the ISI and Pakistan on the other. The first indication that war has begun is the destruction of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. When China screams, we simply say we'll shut off oil supplies to China by invading Iran. China needs oil more than it needs the Paks.

Pakistan's army is equipped with old and outdated arms. India's equipment may be equally as old, but is much better maintained. We don't need to speculate on the status of US equipment. Such a war should be fought as a war of destruction, and we'll let the Indians decide how much rebuilding occurs after we whack all the mullahs, shut down the madrassahs that supply 90% of the Islamic cannon-fodder, and grind their "civilization" into dust. Maybe we'll divide the country equally between India and Afghanistan, and Pakiwakiland will disappear from the world maps.

Any scenario we come up with, we're going to have to become totally barbarian on our enemies, so they will know that messing with the US is not a smart thing to do.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2006-04-30 13:41  

00:00