You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US should set two deadlines leading to Iraq pullout: John Kerry
2006-04-06
WASHINGTON - The United States should set a May 15 deadline for Iraqis to form a unity government and then plan to withdraw its troops by year’s end, Democratic Senator and former presidential candidate John Kerry said in commentary published on Wednesday in The New York Times. “If Iraqis aren’t willing to build a unity government in the five months since the election, they’re probably not willing to build one at all. The civil war will only get worse, and we will have no choice anyway but to leave,” Kerry said.
Which is what JFK wants us to do anyway.
Joining a growing chorus criticizing the US-led occupation of Iraq, Kerry said it was “immoral ... to engage in the same delusion” as in Vietnam, where half of the US casualties occurred “after America’s leaders knew our strategy would not work.”
Except our casualty rate is going down, not up. The civilian casualty rate is going down. Doesn't quite sound like a 'quagmire', does it John?
Kerry described the current situation as “the third war in Iraq in as many years. “The first was against Saddam Hussein and his supposed weapons of mass destruction. The second was against terrorists whom, the administration said it was better to fight over there than here. Now we find our troops in the middle of an escalating civil war.”
The civil war isn't escalating, and indeed it isn't a civil war. Right now it's a) the remanents of the Jihadis and al-Q trying to start a civil war and b) dead squads going around getting payback. Neither is good, and neither is a civil war.
Iraqi leaders so far “have responded only to deadlines -- a deadline to transfer authority to a provisional government, and a deadline to hold three elections,” Kerry said. “Iraqi politicians should be told that they have until May 15 to put together an effective unity government or we will immediately withdraw our military.”
Which tells the jihadis and death squaders that they need a maximum output between now and May 16th.
“If Iraq’s leaders succeed in putting together a government, then we must agree on another deadline: a schedule for withdrawing American combat forces by year’s end,” Kerry said.

To get things rolling, Kerry suggested bringing all the leaders of Iraqi factions together “in a neutral setting” where, working with US allies, the Arab League and the United Nations, they “would be compelled to reach a political agreement.”
What does this guy have with the UN? And why does his proposal sound like the Paris negotiations during the Vietnam War?
Kerry dismissed the US government’s reluctance to put pressure on the Iraqis for fear of making things worse. “In fact, terrible things are happening now because we haven’t gotten tough enough. With two deadlines, we can change all that,” said the senator from Massachusetts.
JFK trying to sound tough is like Barney Fife threatening to fire his pistol.
Posted by:Steve White

#12  Why not 3 deadlines? Or 4? Or 5? Or 6? Or...
JFnK considers this "thinking outside the box".
Posted by: tu3031   2006-04-06 13:48  

#11  And yet another reason why the democrats will never return to power unless they clean up their act.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-04-06 12:39  

#10  Â“Iraqi politicians should be told that they have until May 15 to put together an effective unity government or we will immediately withdraw our military.”

Even coming from John Kerry, the stupidity of this statement is stunning. Has he given any thought whatsoever to the consequences of doing that???

No matter what excuse we were to give for picking up our marbles and going home, both friend and foe alike would see our departure for precisely what it is: an admission of defeat.

Moreover, it would be Mogadishu writ large: it would be taken as proof positive that Osama bin Laden was absolutely right about America when he inferred, from our bugging out of Somalia, that we no longer have the stomach for a long fight; that we are a weak-willed, irresolute paper tiger; and that Islam WILL win in the long run because the West has lost its nerve and the will to survive.

I cannot imagine ANYTHING that would encourage our enemies more.

God have mercy on us if we ever allow these feckless dingalings in the Democratic Party back in power.

Posted by: Dave D.   2006-04-06 12:16  

#9  Kerry is wrong. As Khalilzad said, this culture has a different sense of time than we do. Progress on negotiations that makes folks like us, who actually pay retail, impatient, is forward movement in a society of bazaar merchants. The fact that it takes 5 months, does NOT prove they wont come to a deal in month 6.

But thats not only a criticism of Kerry. Its a criticism of EVERYONE who looks at the region without making allowance for cultural differences, and who judge them accordingly.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-04-06 11:57  

#8  Every time he opens his mouth, another turd falls out.
Who appointed him God?
Posted by: newc   2006-04-06 11:12  

#7  All-in-all, this is a less Kerry-ish statement than usual, and may be indicating a move a bit toward the center by either Kerry himself or the Democrat party.

The only reason why leftists like Kerry "move toward the center" during a war is for the purpose of killing more Americans.
Posted by: badanov   2006-04-06 09:43  

#6  This is the most logical I have seen Sen. Kerry. On count 1, "Iraqi leaders so far “have responded only to deadlines ...", I think he's right (isn't that true of most of us?.
Second, he implies, but does not state explicitly, that the Iraqi leaders would/should not want us to withdraw our troops immediately - such that the threat of doing so under a deadline would push them to resolve their political impasse; again, I suspect he's right. (This was probably the basic message taken to Baghdad by Rice and Straw last week.)
It's only when he demands a schedule for withdrawing troops by year end (schedule by year end or withdrawal by year end?) that I think he's wrong; I think the administration position there is clear and correct - 'circumstances will determine the schedule, and here are the broad circumstantial requirements.'
All-in-all, this is a less Kerry-ish statement than usual, and may be indicating a move a bit toward the center by either Kerry himself or the Democrat party.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-04-06 08:04  

#5  Orwell gave us "Freedom is slavery!"

Then we got "Dissent is patriotic!"

Now, "Let's get tough by retreating!"
Posted by: Mike   2006-04-06 07:12  

#4  So John Kerry is a hooker? Makes sense because he whores himself out so much.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2006-04-06 07:05  

#3  Just tell the Iraqis what MacArthur told the post-WW2 Japanese, in paraphrase - either work together to govern yourselves and your new democracy, or I'll make the decisions for you and govern Japan by myself wid the US Army. The Japs quickly got their act together, the people demo and famously elected a hooker, and the rest is history.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-04-06 02:47  

#2  John Kerry has a terrible problem with deadlines.
Posted by: badanov   2006-04-06 00:43  

#1  Its great that he lost.
Now just get lost Kerry.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-04-06 00:29  

00:00