You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Feingold Draws Little Support for Censure
2006-03-14
WASHINGTON (AP) - Democrats distanced themselves Monday from Wisconsin Sen. Russell Feingold's effort to censure President Bush over domestic spying, preventing a floor vote that could alienate swing voters.

A day of tough, election-year talk between Feingold and Vice President Dick Cheney ended with Senate leaders sending the matter to the Judiciary Committee. ``I look forward to a full hearing, debate and vote in committee on this important matter,'' Feingold said in a statement late Monday. ``If the Committee fails to consider the resolution expeditiously, I will ask that there be a vote in the full Senate.''
You could have had that today.
Republicans dared Democrats to vote for the proposal. ``Some Democrats in Congress have decided the president is the enemy,'' Vice President Dick Cheney told a Republican audience in Feingold's home state.

Feingold, a potential presidential candidate, said on the Senate floor, ``The president has violated the law and Congress must respond.''
I had no idea Karl Rove was this good.
``A formal censure by Congress is an appropriate and responsible first step to assure the public that when the president thinks he can violate the law without consequences, Congress has the will to hold him accountable,'' Feingold said.
Does that work on Senators?
Even as he spoke, Democratic leaders fled held off the immediate vote that Majority Leader Bill Frist requested. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said he didn't know if there ever would be one. The referral averted a debate and a vote that Democrats privately worried would alienate voters who could decide close elections.
Gee, can't imagine why the Dhimmicrats wouldn't want this to come to a vote.
Throughout the day, Feingold's fellow Democrats said they understood his frustration but they held back overt support for the resolution. Several said they wanted first to see the Senate Intelligence Committee finish an investigation of the warrantless wiretapping program that Bush authorized as part of his war on terrorism.
So that they don't look completely stupid. What they really want now is for this to go away since they saw that the public has no problem with reading al-Qaeda communications.
Asked at a news conference whether he would vote for the censure resolution, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada declined to endorse it and said he hadn't read it. Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., said he had not read it either and wasn't inclined simply to scold the president. ``I'd prefer to see us solve the problem,'' Lieberman told reporters.
You're about the only one, Joe.
Across the Capitol, reaction was similar. Feingold's censure resolution drew empathy but no outright support from Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi ``understands Sen. Feingold's frustration that the facts about the NSA domestic surveillance program have not been disclosed appropriately to Congress,'' her office said in a statement. ``Both the House and the Senate must fully investigate the program and assign responsibility for any laws that may have been broken.''
"And if we can't find any broken laws, we'll screech and scream and hold our breath."
Posted by:Steve White

#23  Little support? The donks are running away from this stink bomb.
Posted by: Captain America   2006-03-14 18:40  

#22  You can use 2xROFLMAO for an even sharper argument.
Posted by: 6   2006-03-14 18:16  

#21  ROFLMAO a hell of a retort JC. 3.2
Posted by: 6   2006-03-14 18:16  

#20  JC thinks he's a zen master when in fact he's just a five year old in the back seat asking "are we there yet?". Heh.
Posted by: Gleper Jaque6309   2006-03-14 16:56  

#19  wxjames:

you have a very vivd imagination. the only body slam occured there and it damn sure didnt involve me.

buy yeah, I'm impressed by the "intellectual firepower" from the regular posters in this site.

I just cant keep up...rotflmao..too damn funny
Posted by: Just Curious   2006-03-14 16:47  

#18  yeah, we'll see you in November.

That's what we heard in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2005.

How's that working for ya?
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-03-14 16:34  

#17  questions, questions, eh JC?

So many questions in your mind and zero ability to present answers.
Posted by: 2b   2006-03-14 16:33  

#16  Curious you came back to argue more today.
After the Feingold body slam one would think Just Curious would have the good sense to lay there and bleed a while.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-03-14 16:29  

#15  lack of ideas? Exactly WHAT good ideas have the republicans come up with? Apparently the american public doesnt think youre doing such a good job...

yeah, we'll see you in November.
Posted by: Just Curious   2006-03-14 14:39  

#14  Poll #'s, even when not rigged, come and go, up and down. What matters is the ONE poll that occurs the first Tuesday of every other November. Your people have made a habit of showing your true selves, and your lack of substantive ideas and solutions, your transparent powerlust, in time for that poll - the one that actually counts - to kick a few more of you out on your asses each time.

You spit in the wind and think it's raining.

Waay too much time and bandwidth has been spent on your inanity.

Toodles. See you in November.
Posted by: Chetle Omath7541   2006-03-14 14:34  

#13  I fail to see any humor in that...
I'd say those people have been as effective as
Bush has been ineffective, even in the minority..lmao

Maybe you need to check again Prez Bush latest poll#s and ask yourself why repubs up for election/re-election are getting as far away from him as they can as if he has the plague.
Posted by: Just Curious   2006-03-14 14:20  

#12  That's right - Dean, Pelosi, and Reid speak for the Dhimmidonks.

LOL.
Posted by: Chetle Omath7541   2006-03-14 14:08  

#11  Murtha/Fiengold speak for themselves, not the
Democratic Party.
Posted by: Just Curious   2006-03-14 14:06  

#10  cowards who bray at the President, yet don't have the courage of their convictions (wink wink Mr. Clinton) to put it down in a vote. The Murtha/Feingold party of accusers who slide back in the closet when the light's turned on. Is this the party to lead this country? Platform? We'll show it to ya right before the election.
Posted by: Frank G   2006-03-14 13:53  

#9  Image hosting by Photobucket
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-03-14 12:36  

#8  Sen. Feingold is speaking to the radical liberal left at the base of the Democratic Party to
appease and mobilize them for upcoming 2006
mid-term elections. These are the people calling for Bush's impeachment and removal from office. I'm quite sure he knows the censure proposal is more symbolic than realistic. Like Sen. Frist said this is "political gamemanship".

That I agree with in that Republicans consistantly demonized former President Clinton in an effort to motivate their radical rightwing conservative base and even went a step further to actually impeach him and have him removed from office. Even though they failed it gave the radical right the red meat the craved.
Posted by: Just Curious   2006-03-14 11:27  

#7  As usual, there's the plans within plans.

Feingold SAYS what Bush did was illegal, but what Feingold SAYS and what CONGRESS or a COURT says are three different things.

Feingold, in a sense, loses nothing in this maneuver: If Bush is censured, then he'll say that Congress agreed with him that what Bush did was illegal, and so requires a special prosecutor to pursue the issue, etc., etc..

On the other hand, if the measure is defeated, NO MENTION will be made that Congress AGREED WITH BUSH that what Bush did was LEGAL. It will all be waved away as partisianship, and not that a majority of senators agreed with Bush.

What? there are more Republican senators than Democratic senators in the Senate? Well tough shit, that's called HAVING AND USING A MAJORITY. The dems HAD IT AND USED IT, and now they scream when THEY DON'T HAVE IT AND CAN'T USE IT.

Integrity? Not a shred...
Posted by: Ptah   2006-03-14 11:11  

#6  Russell covets the White House - or at least a WH run. I bet he hasn't had this much MSM kissing and hugging for some time.
Posted by: lotp   2006-03-14 10:09  

#5  End the debate. Bring it to a vote today.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-03-14 10:07  

#4  "... when the president thinks he can violate the law without consequences..."

I guess this is more of Feingold's "measured reactions" the USA Today was referring to the other day.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-03-14 09:31  

#3  This kind of shit is why the Republicans don't seem to be that worried about Nov. The funny part is the GOP can let the Dims do all the work.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-03-14 08:20  

#2  I had no idea Karl Rove was this good.

Neither do the Democrats, but don't tell them that.
Posted by: Charles   2006-03-14 03:56  

#1  Let's censure f'ing feingold - betcha there'd be more support for that.

Asshole
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2006-03-14 01:48  

00:00