You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Suspected drawings of nuclear test site found in Iran: diplomats
2006-02-09
Iran has design drawings for building a 400-metre (more than 1,300 feet) deep shaft that is clearly for underground, possibly nuclear, weapons testing, diplomats told AFP. But the diplomats said there were no indications that Iran, which some experts believe is weeks months years away from being able to build an atomic bomb, has constructed or plans to build such a site.

The document was part of US intelligence which has been made available to the UN nuclear watchdog and which has been presented to Iran, said a diplomat, who asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue.
"Hokay, Mahmoud, they found the hole. Start digging another one."
Officials from the Vienna-based toothless watchdog International Atomic Energy Agency refused to comment but an IAEA report on January 31 said the UN watchdog had presented Iran with "information that had been made available to the agency" and which concerned work related to high explosives. Iran has dismissed this information as "related to baseless allegations," according to the report which did not provide details about the high explosives data.
"Lies! All lies!"
The report said the IAEA was also looking into "alleged undeclared studies" to build a secret plant for converting uranium, a step in making nuclear reactor fuel that can also be bomb material, and "the design of a missile re-entry vehicle, all of which could have a military nuclear dimension."
Oh, ya think?
A Western diplomat said the design for the underground shaft, with sensors in it to be connected "to a control center 10 kilometres (six miles) away" was "clearly designed for some underground testing," and that this could be nuclear although the design did not indicate that this was for atomic weapons testing.
Such documennts are rarely labeled with a square at the bottom of the shaft and the label, "nuclear explosive device sits here until the big moment".The diplomat said the IAEA had asked the United States for permission to show the classified document to the Iranians.
"Sure, why not, it's not like you guys will accomplish anything anyway."
The information was part of extensive Farsi-language computer files and reports which the United States has obtained and feels is the best sign yet that Iran seeks to make nuclear weapons. US officials are confident the data is genuine, diplomats said, even though some analysts have criticized it as unreliable since it is believed to come from only one source.

The data concerns a program called Project 111 under which the Iranians have also studied how to design a ballistic missile to handle a load that is not named as a possible nuclear warhead. The word "nuclear" is not mentioned in any of the Project 111 documents.
We never mentioned "nuclear" in any documents when I worked out in the Titan missile patch. "It" was refered to as the "re-entry vehicle".
But the "package" could only be for this purpose due to the height at which the missile is set to explode on re-entry, diplomats said. "The shaft design was part of Project 111," the Western diplomat said.

The IAEA report of January 31 also said that Iran had handed over a document on how to make uranium hemispheres whose only use would be in making nuclear weapons. Iran claims not to have used the information for weapons work as it says it was given the document without asking for it by an international nuclear smuggling network which offered it technology and parts in 1987.
"Nope, nope, we never looked at it, didn't even photocopy it, nope."
The IAEA has also "shared with Iran" new information it has that Iran may have taken deliveries of sophisticated P-2 centrifuges, machines that enrich uranium, despite Tehran saying it has only received P-2 designs.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#4  Its North Korea we need to worry about. they actualy have nukes, but the president seems more iterested in who might get them.
Posted by: EKL   2006-02-09 20:59  

#3  Don't worry, 6, we've still got enough firepower for Iran with plenty to spare.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-02-09 10:26  

#2  WIsh we could have held on to the 52 Titans. There's talk about rearming some Tridents with conventional warheads, the Titans would be able to lift 10 times a much larger payload.

Course it might freaked out the wrong people.
Posted by: 6   2006-02-09 10:23  

#1  "diplomats told AFP... But the diplomats said...experts believe...said a diplomat, who asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue...Officials from...looking into alleged...can also be...all of which could have...A Western diplomat said...and that this could be...The diplomat said...US officials are confident...diplomats said, even though some analysts...the Western diplomat said...may have taken..."

More definitive proof.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2006-02-09 09:28  

00:00