You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Lord Carey denies being Cataphobic, but 'ashamed to be an Anglican'
2006-02-09
The former archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, told The Jerusalem Post on Tuesday he was "ashamed to be an Anglican" following Monday's vote by the Church of England to disinvest from companies whose products are used by the Israeli government in the territories. The February 6 divestment vote, which was backed by current Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, was "a most regrettable and one-sided statement," Lord Carey said, and one that "ignores the trauma of ordinary Jewish people" in Israel subjected to terrorist attacks.
You do get the feeling that some of God's lambs are less important to the Archbishop.
Lord Carey joined Jewish leaders protesting the vote by the General Synod, the church's legislature, to adopt a "morally responsible investment in the Palestinian occupied territories and, in particular, to disinvest from companies profiting from the illegal occupation, such as Caterpillar Inc., until they change their policies." The church's call to pressure Caterpillar and other multi-nationals to withdraw from the territories was a "one-eyed" response that "only rebukes one side," Lord Carey said, and displayed the church's "propensity to reduce complex issues to black and white."
That's the progressive left for you.
Jon Benjamin, the chief executive officer of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, branded the synod vote "simplistic" and "unbalanced."
He could also have said "petty" and "small-souled," but he was too polite...
"What it shows is that the thinking of people who support these resolutions is not very sophisticated," he said. There were sound reasons why the Israeli government had adopted its security policies, but these were never "aired or discussed" by the synod, Benjamin said.
That would have diverted the focus of the synod, of course.
During the one-hour debate that preceded the vote, a letter from the Anglican bishop in Jerusalem, the Rt. Rev. Riah Abu al-Assal, condemning the Israeli government's use of Caterpillar tractors to demolish Palestinian homes was read to the synod.
"Okay, okay, I said it! Now please don't kill me!"
Did he say anything about the Paleostinians crapping in the Church of the Holy Trinity?
The bishop of Chelmsford, the Rt. Rev. John Gladwin, said he held Israel responsible for the worsening plight of Palestinian Christians, telling the synod, "Caterpillar may be a company being used for dreadful purposes across the world, but the problem is not Caterpillar. The problem is the situation in the Middle East and the government of Israel."
Israel is responsible for the Paleo Christians? Remind us John, who trashed the Paleo churches on the West Bank?
The chairman of the Council of Christians and Jews, the Rt. Rev. Christopher Herbert, bishop of St. Albans, disagreed and objected to the disinvestment call, telling the synod it was "unbalanced" and failed to reflect the complexity of the situation. A counter motion offered by the pro-Israel pressure group "Anglicans for Israel" was not presented to the synod, as time was called on the debate after one hour.
"Time's up! Vote! And what's for lunch?"
The synod adopted the motion by a show of hands, with Archbishop Williams voting in favor, and the archbishop of York, John Sentamu, abstaining.
Brave Sir Robin abstained.
Dr. Irene Lancaster, of the Center for Jewish Studies at Manchester University, said the vote marked "a very black day for Anglican-Jewish relations."
Just another bit of casual anti-Semitism with a veneer of holier-than-thou and the usual overlay of Social Justice™ claptrap. Julius Streicher was at least honest about it.
"The Jewish community will have to reconsider their attitude to interfaith work with the Anglican community," she said, adding, "The writing is on the wall for the Jews of Great Britain, 350 years after they settled here."
I don't know that I'd go that far. But I'd expect them to stand by with folded hands and pursed lips when the festivities do begin in earnest.
The symbolism of this vote was that "Israel will be criticized regardless of what happens," Benjamin said. In the mind of the Church of England, "nothing Israel ever will do will be right, while nothing the Palestinians will do will ever be wrong," he charged.
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  Don't forget Prince Charles is titular head of the Church....must really have something on him to get them to apologize for slave trafficking. Also, they are reopening Princess Di's case, so maybe they will change their tune and divest from the Palestinians. A church split is really not a loss, though.
Posted by: Danielle   2006-02-09 13:34  

#6  Just another bit of casual anti-Semitism

Nope. A number of the people who saved Jews dyuring WWII were antisemitic: they didn't like Jews but they opposed their killing. What we have here is alter-nazism: supporting people who try yo exterminate the Jews.
Posted by: JFM   2006-02-09 11:08  

#5  Anyone ever heard of the Church of England disenvesting from slave-taker and genocider Soudan? Or from Indonesia during the East-Timor genocide? Or from Saddam's Irak when he gassed Kurds? Or from China for its atrocities in Tibet?

Just what I thought. They only care when there are Jews around.
Posted by: JFM   2006-02-09 11:03  

#4  Remember that both the British Anglican and American Episcopalians are minorities within Anglicanism, now officially seen as doctrinally flawed members of the communion, and no longer sanctioned for many activities. That is, they are seen as borderline schismatics.

In the US, again, the conservative Anglicans have or are becoming African missionary churches, so they are no longer under the sway of liberal American bishops.

Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-02-09 09:30  

#3  I think it's less anti-Semitism, as in hatred for Jews, and more cowardice, shameless kow-towing to the alter of Progressive 3rd-Worldist pieties and a pitiful attempt to win temporary reprieve from the hostilities of the expanding Islam. These tired and toothless old men with no congregation to speak of are empty figure-heads and easily dominated by the aggressive Muslims and their old intellectual commrades increasingly dogmatic Left.
Posted by: Monsieur Moonbat   2006-02-09 01:57  

#2  The Christian population of the Palestinian Territories has declined from 18% at the time of the British mandate and the creation of Israel to less than 2% today. In contrast the christian population of Israel has grown substantially over that period. While the Christian population of Israel includes immigrants from places like Russia. It is clear that not only has the Palestinian Christian population in Israel grown, it will soon be the only palestinian christian population left in the middle east.

Israel is in fact the protector of palestinian christians and the Anglican church has a serious case of reality inversion.
Posted by: phil_b   2006-02-09 00:53  

#1  Like I said any thing made by a company onwend by an Anglican is off the list of stuff I am going to purchase. I also extends to not using or renting facilities owned by the Anglican church here in the US. That is going to cost them about 400 X 2 bucks right off the bat this year.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2006-02-09 00:32  

00:00