You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Rumsfeld: Iran is the Top State Sponsor of Terrorism
2006-02-04
U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld accused Iran on Saturday of being the world's leading sponsor of terrorism, a charge that his Iranian counterpart rejected as "ridiculous" and "outrageous." "The Iranian regime is today the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism," Rumsfeld told an annual security conference in Munich where talk of Iran's nuclear program was at the top of the agenda. "The world does not want, and must work together to prevent, a nuclear Iran," he said.
Correction, Don, a big part of the Western world either doesn't care or is secretly hoping the Iranians nuke the Joooos.
Rumsfeld spoke just before the UN's nuclear watchdog decided to report Iran, which Washington and the European Union fear is covertly developing atomic weapons, to the UN Security Council. "We must continue to work together to seek a diplomatic solution to stopping the development of (Iran's) uranium enrichment program," Rumsfeld said.

"While we oppose the actions of Iran's regime, we stand with the Iranian people who want a peaceful democratic future. They have no desire to see the country they love isolated from the rest of the civilized world," he said.

Iranian Defense Minister Mostafa Mohammad-Najjar was quoted by Iranian state television as saying Rumsfeld's comments were "outrageous remarks and a ridiculous projection by the White House leaders."

"Rumsfeld had better try to act responsibly for the disgrace of attacking Afghanistan and Iraq, because the people of the world will never forget the torturing of the prisoners of Abu-Ghraib," he said.

IAlthough he labeled the Islamic republic of Iran as the main sponsor of terrorism, Rumsfeld said Islamic terrorists had made Iraq the "central front in their war against the civilized world." Rumsfeld said they were using Iraq as a training and recruiting ground, in the same way as they operated in Afghanistan when the Taliban were in charge.

But he vehemently rejected any suggestion that Iraq had been a catalyst for a global wave of terrorist acts. "Any argument that Iraq might have been a trigger is inconsistent with the facts," he said, listing a number of terrorist acts that took place even before September 11, 2001. In addition to the September 11 attacks, which are believed to have been carried out by al Qaeda, Rumsfeld named other attacks which he said Islamic terrorists had masterminded. He mentioned the massacre of schoolchildren in Beslan, Russia and bombings in Britain, Spain, Egypt, Israel and elsewhere.

Rumsfeld said that the world needed to prepare itself for a long fight against Islamic terrorists who he said wanted to set up a global Islamic empire. "They have designed and distributed a map where national borders are erased and replaced by a global extremist Islamic empire," he said. "As during the Cold War, the struggle ahead promises to be a long war."

Washington and its allies were doing everything possible to ensure that terrorists did not get hold of weapons of mass destruction, which he described as a nightmare scenario. "The world would change overnight if a handful of terrorists managed to obtain and launch a chemical, biological, or radiological weapon," he said.
Posted by:lotp

#2  Well said.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2006-02-04 12:56  

#1  "The world would change overnight if a handful of terrorists managed to obtain and launch a chemical, biological, or radiological weapon"

We must remember these words.

Specifically, because that is precisely what the handful of terrorists who run Iran want to do: change the world.

They know it, Rumsfeld knows it. So he is challenging them to use a nuclear weapon. He is telling them that they are right, that when they use their nuke, it will change the world.

In their minds, however, "change" means something very different than what "change" means to Rumsfeld. For them, "change" means the return of the 12th Imam and the world bathed in fire and blood.

For Rumsfeld, assuming that we shoot down that nuclear weapon when launched, "change" means that Iran will no longer be able to threaten the world. That when and if they launch a nuclear weapon, the US will have carte blanche to do to Iran whatever it feels is necessary to insure this.

And yes, the world will be changed forever. Because everyone will see what happens when you are foolish enough to throw a nuclear weapon at your hated enemies.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-02-04 12:42  

00:00