You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Call to Destroy Uhud Cave Rejected
2006-01-23
Here we have another sterling example of the high regard for history and the origins of Islam evinced by its Wahhab overseers...
MADINAH, 23 January 2006 — The cave where Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) took rest during the Battle of Uhud has become the subject of debate among scholars, some arguing for its destruction.

Madinah Governor Prince Abdul Aziz ibn Majed told Asharq Al-Awsat, the sister publication of Arab News, that he rejected the idea of destroying the site. A committee was formed recently to discuss the matter after years of complaints over visitors that come to the cave to worship.

Some scholars have suggested simply fencing off the two-meter-wide entrance to the cave located about a kilometer from the ridge where archers were positioned during battles between followers of Islam and pagans. During the Battle of Uhud, the Prophet, who was wounded in the skirmish, took rest in this cave. Pilgrims have been coming to this cave in increasing numbers, seeking blessings and taking photos.

Talal Al-Raddadi, a local resident, said that the question of what to do about the unsanctioned visits was raised more than six years ago. "They ask for blessings from that place and commit acts that are not related to Islam. Many people asked to destroy the site. I say to those that want to destroy it that destroying the site is not an option. We should raise awareness and tell visitors that this is not a true place of worship. We should place awareness boards. I wish that they would not create problems by destroying the mountain. I think destroying it will do more harm than leaving it alone," said Al-Raddadi.

"Turkish pilgrims do not miss visiting the site when visiting Madinah. It is the site where the Prophet lost one of his front teeth," said Muhammad Yelmaz from Turkey. He said that they come to visit the cave and ask for forgiveness. They kiss the rocks believing that the Prophet sat on them when he was inside the cave.

Anwar Bakri, professor at Tayba University in Madinah, warns against extremist movements that want to destroy all monuments in Madinah. He said that destroying the cave would only increase anger and not solve the problem and will damage the image of Islam. "Mistakes will happen whether intentionally or unintentionally," said Asem Hamdan, another professor. "Destroying the site is neither a logical nor a final solution. When Muslims entered other countries and found non-Islamic monuments, they did not destroy them. We can read history to prove that. I call on the tourism authority to step in and protect the site."

Al-Jarbu, a teacher at Madinah Islamic University, believes that destroying the site is the only solution. He said that there is no point in placing fences around the site because people will still go over the fence to the cave. "The only solution in my mind is to destroy it because there are some locals who are benefiting from it," Jarbu said. "Destroying it will solve the problem for good."

The governor of Madinah said that the cave would be fenced and not destroyed. He said that the main idea is to stop the non-Islamic behavior by protecting the site.
Posted by:Seafarious

#10  CF, I think you were doing fine up to the last line.
Posted by: Ptah   2006-01-23 21:51  

#9  "When Muslims entered other countries and found non-Islamic monuments, they did not destroy them. We can read history to prove that."
Well, not exactly. Remember those giant Bhudda statues in Afghanistan? I don't know what history he's reading. In the cases they did not destroy them, it's because they were already in ruins. They just built on top of them. On top of cemeteries, on top of Jewish temples, on top of Hindu temples, on top of Christian churches... Not that Islam has a monopoly on this sort of behavior, but they've certainly done their share of damage.
Posted by: Darrell   2006-01-23 21:15  

#8  CZ, you're right up against the redaction / deletion line again. There are ways to make your point without deliberately being quite that hateful in your language.
Posted by: lotp   2006-01-23 20:53  

#7  For the record, Uhud was the only battlefield defeat suffered by Muhammed the fake prophet and real pedophile. After the setback, Muhammed concocted more fictitious after-life rewards for "martyrs." The tantalizing fictions drew the stupid into his gang of thieves, and he soon had the numbers to do real damage.

From the cult's unscrupulous founder to the clerical parasites who lead the army of imbeciles, Muslims have proven that you can trust them as far as you can spit against a hurricane. The West needs to occupy their pig-pens, and crush the jihad pork out of those animals.
Posted by: CaziFarkus   2006-01-23 20:38  

#6  They destroy the ancient artifacts so other Muslims will not realize that the Wahabis are reinventing Islam much like Hitler reinvented German history.

Al
Posted by: Frozen Al   2006-01-23 17:18  

#5  Mohammed went to the mountain. So the mountain must be destroyed.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-01-23 11:08  

#4  'Moose, I believe the very first thing the Salafists do is plow under all the gravestones in the cemeteries, and 'quarry' the rock to build new mosque buildings. *Then* they bring out the whitewash.
Posted by: Seafarious   2006-01-23 10:12  

#3  the Calvanists were never a large movement, nor took over and destroyed many Catholic churches.

Don't tell the Presbyterians or Congregationalists.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-01-23 09:47  

#2  The Wahabbis are dead set to destroy every tangible bit of ancient Islam, and have destroyed much that is in Arabia already.

Whenever they move into an area and take over its mosque, the first thing they do is destroy all artwork, decoration and anything not plain. Then they whitewash the walls.

They reject it much like the Calvanists rejected the trappings of the Catholic Church. Except the Calvanists were never a large movement, nor took over and destroyed many Catholic churches.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-01-23 09:22  

#1  i hated skool,

can you immagine going Sod-land and becoming a "Wahab scholar".

LOL... call dr. Kevorkian
have become passe

to destroy all their history as it will allow them a when they realize they too .

Posted by: Karl   2006-01-23 01:22  

00:00