You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran may accept Russian enrichment proposal for now
2006-01-17
A POTENTIAL breakthrough in the nuclear stand-off with Iran came last night when the Iranian ambassador in Moscow praised a proposal to move Tehran's uranium enrichment programme to Russia.

Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, said last night that his position is "very close" to that of the United States and Britain. And it appeared that he could hold the key to a resolution when Iran's ambassador to Russia, Gholamreza Ansari, welcomed an offer to move the Iranian uranium enrichment programme to Russia.

Such a move would mean Iran, which is developing a missile which could reach Israel, could not acquire enough material for a bomb. "As far as Russia's proposal is concerned, we consider it constructive and are carefully studying it. This is a good initiative to resolve the situation. We believe that Iran and Russia should find a way out of this jointly," said Mr Ansari.

Mr Putin emerged from separate talks with Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, saying he was treating the situation with caution - but he in no way condoned Iran's decision to break the seals from its uranium enhancement plants a fortnight ago. "We need to move very carefully in this area. I personally do not allow myself a single careless announcement and do not allow the foreign ministry to make a single uncertain step," Mr Putin said. "We must work on the Iranian problem very carefully, not allowing abrupt, erroneous steps."
This just allows the dance to continue. It doesn't solve the basic problem -- Iran wants nuclear weapons so that it can own nuclear-tipped intercontinental and intermediate-range missiles. Whether it's to obliterate Israel, push its neighbors around or insulate itself from Western pressure, it's just unacceptable. If what Putin is doing is giving himself a fig leaf for future use -- "they rejected our reasonable proposal, so now we are forced to vote against Iran in the Security Council" -- well and good. But I suspect it's being done so that when the US/UK says this is unacceptable, he can then block UNSC action.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  I dont think the US and UK will say this is unacceptable - and I dont think Russia will vote for sanctions as a first step in any case. They dont even seem to be completely on board as voting for referral to the UNSC yet. If the Iranians reject this, then that does give Putin cover to suppor the West and thats good. The bad is if the Iranians use this to drag things out, arguing over the details of the Putin proposal for months, then rejecting it. And if in the meanwhile the UNSC has dithered. Which gets to the question of just how close Iran IS to a bomb, and how much it a lost few months (while they enrich) costs us.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-01-17 12:13  

#2  This is what I would do, say yes to the deal, then just screw on them down the road. And I'd say that is what Iran is doing too. Buying themselves a little breathing room. We have just managed to prolong this crisis for another several years so that Iran can enrich in secret or extract plutonium from the spent fuel rods in a last minute deal breaker.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2006-01-17 05:12  

#1  AGREED - Russia's and China's own history in antiquity shows that neither Moscow nor Beijing will ever tolerate any lessor power capable of challenging them or destroying them. Iran = North Korea's ultimate utility is to frighten and intimidate Clinton-led America unto anti-American anti-sovereign American Socialism, besides of course the usual geopol econ concessions. China will never allow NorKor to possess any independent nuke arsenal sufficient enough to destroy or challenge Beijing, and neither will it nor Russia allow a host of Iran-style nuke Islamic "wild cards" on their peripheries. Iran-NK , etal are safe from Russia-China as long as the USA, and afterwards NATO-EU, is the main target. OTOH, ONLY THE USA HAS GMD - Russia-China knows that Dubya & Company knows that the sword tip of a poten nuclear "wild card" Iran, etc. also points ags them. DUBYA > HOW LONG CAN RUSSIA-CHINA WAIT FOR A US-IRANIAN = US-NORKOR =... WAR(S) BEFORE THEY MOVE TO PROTECT THEIR AMBITIONS FOR NEW HEGEMONY.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-01-17 01:46  

00:00