You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Schoolgirls are evil
2006-01-15
from Islam Q&A
I am a young man and I have been letting my beard grow for nearly a year and I am trying to do acts of worship and keep away from forbidden things as much as I can. But I have been faced with the problem of finding work, until I found a job teaching in a high school for girls. I want to know whether it is permissible for me to carry on in this job. What is the ruling on the money that I have earned from it up till now?.

Answer : Praise be to Allaah.
For a man to work as a teacher in a high school for girls, where he meets them with no barrier and most of them may adorn themselves and show their charms – as is the case in the country where the questioner lives – no wise man would doubt that this is haraam, because of the bad effects and evil results for both men and women. We have discussed these evil results in the answer to question no. 50398.

It says in Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah (12/149): It is not permissible for a man to teach girls directly because of the serious dangers and grave consequences involved in that.

It also says (12/156): Firstly: Mixing between men and women in schools and elsewhere is a great evil which may corrupt religious commitment and worldly interests. It is not permissible for a woman to teach or work in a place where men and women mix, and it is not permissible for her owner guardian to give her permission to do that.

Secondly: it is not permissible for a man to teach a woman who is not wearing hijab, and it is not permissible for him to teach her when he is alone with her, even if she is wearing proper hijab. When a woman is with a man who is a non-mahram her entire being is ‘awrah. As for covering the head and showing the face, this is not full hijab.

Thirdly: there is nothing wrong with a man teaching a woman from behind a screen in women-only schools, where there is no mixing between male and female students, or between the (male) teacher and (female) students. If they need to ask him questions, it should be means of closed circuit TV, which is well known and easily available, or via the phone, but the students should beware of speaking softly. End quote.
Posted by:Spoper Grineque2022

#10  Another illustration of Islamic male mindset in action: i.e., take no responsibility for anything, and blame women for everythying.

These Islamic men seem inordinately horny--like it's all they ever think about, and secondly, it seems that they have a ridiculous time controlling themselves sexually once their horny mechanism has been switched to "on" (also out of their control). I'd advise them to get back in the driver's seat, but I don't think they have a vehicle.

A thought: send this question/answer to the girl's high school admin and see what happens.

Islamics-R-Idiots.
Posted by: ex-lib   2006-01-15 15:01  

#9  I agree, Steve. Not all those who advocate women's rights are on the left thank goodness.

It is true, the lefties actually are quite retrograde on women's rights. THey ignore condoleeza, most powerful woman in the world right now as she is on the right. They ignore that Bush took out the Taliban. They ignore the chattel slavery of women in fundamentalist islamist nations because of PC imperatives to 'respect all cultures equally' even those that deserve a bollocking.

The left is actually the backwards looking brigade and the right has become progressive as far as individual liberties and equal rights is concerned.

How weird is that?

Well I know which side I stand on!
Posted by: anon1   2006-01-15 14:10  

#8  so it's not true that those who support women's rights don't stick up for the US: we do!

Not a member of Women In Black, eh? Yes it is a generalization, but on the whole, the Left regards Bush HitlerBurton as a greater threat to human rights than the Islamofascists we are fighting a against. To call this behaviour naive is an understatement.
Posted by: SteveS   2006-01-15 10:31  

#7  LOL Anonymoose!

..and Allah knows best about charms.

Posted by: RD   2006-01-15 10:15  

#6  I'm female and i applauded the US military for removing the Taliban. I went to anti-war rallies with a megaphone and a friend and shouted at the idiotarians. so it's not true that those who support women's rights don't stick up for the US: we do!
Posted by: anon1   2006-01-15 10:03  

#5  Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Kill Evil Schoolgirls for Allan!
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-01-15 09:53  

#4  If the women are allowed to "show their charms", then this guy's in a western country.

So unemployemnt is the cause of "disenfranchised muslim youth" in various EU countries and points west, we've been told.

Perhaps the problem is that they CANT get jobs because fatwa's don't permit them to work with, or for, women. And women do make up 50% of the workforce in most "western" societies.

Rock and hard place, Mahmoud.
Posted by: Hupomoger Clans9827   2006-01-15 09:40  

#3  Yeah, you notice how NAG [National Association of Gals] cheered on the American military who liberated more females in a couple of years than they've liberated in decades? NOT.
Posted by: Slurt Hupeart2484   2006-01-15 09:18  

#2  End apartheid and slavery now!

If I was talking about black men oppressed by whites, I would have the sympathy of the Western media.

But the sexist c**** don't give a c*** about women. We could be aliens or another species, in Australia particularly. Sorry for the swearing but it really irritates me.
Posted by: anon1   2006-01-15 08:43  

#1  Strange, that the imam doesn't even touch on the fact that IT'S A CRIME TO TEACH GIRLS, PERIOD.
Posted by: gromky   2006-01-15 00:15  

00:00