You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Europeans Say Iran Talks Reach 'Dead End'
2006-01-12
The British, French and German foreign ministers said Thursday that negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program had reached a "dead end" and the Islamic republic should be referred to the U.N. Security Council.

The ministers did not specify what action should be taken by the Security Council, which could impose sanctions. They called for a special session of the International Atomic Energy Agency to decide the referral.

The action came two days after Iran broke U.N. seals at a uranium enrichment plant and said it was resuming nuclear research after a two-year freeze. Enriched uranium can be used as a fuel for both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. Iran says its nuclear program is only for fuel.

In a joint statement, the diplomats cited Iran's "documented record of concealment and deception" and charged that its government seems "intent on turning its back on better relations with the international community."

"From our point of view, the time has come for the U.N. Security Council to become involved," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said after meeting with his French and British counterparts and the European Union's foreign policy chief, Javier Solana.

The Bush administration, meanwhile, arranged to have Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns go to Britain, France and Germany next week to coordinate strategy. Burns also will hold talks in India, said a senior U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity because the State Department was not ready to issue a formal statement. While Burns will be consulting in Europe, Solana plans to be in Washington to coordinate with Bush administration officials.

Steinmeier said the three countries would inform the board "that our talks with Iran have reached a dead end." Solana said the EU and national governments were left with no choice but to call for Iran's referral. But he would not rule out a new round of negotiations with Tehran.

Steinmeier stressed that the Europeans remain ready to solve the problem "diplomatically, multilaterally and by peaceful means."

Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has vowed to press ahead with a nuclear program that Iran says is designed to produce civilian energy.

"Unfortunately, a group of bullies allows itself to deprive nations of their legal and natural rights," he said Wednesday. "I tell those superpowers that, with strength and prudence, Iran will pave the way to achieving peaceful nuclear energy.

Iran's move increased worries in the United States and other Western countries that Iran intends to produce nuclear weapons, while Russia, a longtime Iran ally, indicated it could reverse its opposition to bringing Tehran before the Security Council, which could impose sanctions.

Russia and China, both members of the IAEA board that would have to approve referring Iran to the Security Council, have previously opposed the idea.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Russia, the United States, the European Union and China would discuss the issue in London next week.

He told Ekho Moskvy radio that Iran's latest move did not violate international law — but also said that Moscow did not exclude the possibility of turning the Iranian dossier over to the Security Council.

"It causes concern that Iran is opting out of its moratorium in the absence of answers to questions, serious questions" from the IAEA, Lavrov said. "Our main task is to persuade Tehran through joint efforts to return to the moratorium."

China on Thursday urged more talks, without saying whether it would back taking Tehran to the Security Council.

China "hopes that all parties concerned can exercise restraint and resolve this within the IAEA framework and through peaceful negotiations," Foreign Ministry spokesman Kong Quan said in Beijing. "We firmly believe this serves the interests of all parties concerned."
Posted by:lotp

#10  So even the EUniks agreed that negotiating with Iran is like pissing up a rope. If the matter goes to the UNSC, we will be burning up another 6 months minimum, with no assurance that anything will come of it. The Russians and the Chicoms will always veto.

The problem is that we may not have the luxury of that much time before Iran gets to its nuclear capability.

The situation calls for action. The EUniks will not move to action. So that leaves the ball in the court of the US and Israel. Covert or overt. That is how I see it.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2006-01-12 18:34  

#9  Europeans Say Iran Talks Reach 'Dead End': Call for Negotiations to Move to UNSC
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2006-01-12 13:08  

#8  In a joint statement, the diplomats cited Iran's "documented record of concealment and deception" and charged that its government seems "intent on turning its back on better relations with the international community."

And this BGO (Blinding Glimpse of the Obvious) was not apparent until after exactly how many years of this precise pattern of deceit? Europe's fascination with futile nuanced negotiations makes rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic look like productive and worthwhile effort.
Posted by: Zenster   2006-01-12 12:29  

#7  ..maybe, is that the US and the Euros are finally 'singing from the same page'..

Singing from the same page possibly, but not on the same bar.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2006-01-12 12:26  

#6  What's really sad about this situation is that:
a) Europe really does not want a nuclear Iran even if it suspects the US and Israel will be the first targets.
b) Europe knows that if the West stands together to compel Iran to comply with the rules, the issue will be resolved relatively quickly by policy change, internal regime change or force of arms. In practice this means that if the Nato countries all sent even token forces to the region to support a US carrier battle group the likeliehood of a peaceful ending would go way up and as would the likliehood that a military ending would be effective if it became necessary.

Yet the euros are incapable of acting in such a willful manner and therefore the chances of a military conflict are higher, not lower.
Posted by: JAB   2006-01-12 12:18  

#5  I'm sure that the Euros, Russians and Chinese will go along with sanctions just like they did with sanctions on Iraq. After all how long has the OFF scam been shut down? Think how much moolah the MMs can sink into bribery.
Posted by: AlanC   2006-01-12 12:17  

#4  Europeans Say Iran Talks Reach 'Dead End'

And here I thought that the talk will continue until Iran nukes the Zionist aggressor.
Posted by: gromgoru   2006-01-12 12:16  

#3  This is probably the same thought that goes through Ahmanidgit's mind but, so what? What difference does it make if one branch of a worthless organization refers Iran to another branch of the same worthless organization. Who on this planet could possibly care what the UN thinks about anything? They. won't. do. ANYTHING.
Posted by: BH   2006-01-12 12:03  

#2  and more important, maybe, is that the US and the Euros are finally 'singing from the same page' a blow to those who claimed Bush had permanently distanced us from Europe.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-01-12 11:53  

#1  '"Unfortunately, a group of bullies allows itself to deprive nations of their legal and natural rights," he said Wednesday. "I tell those superpowers that, with strength and prudence, Iran will pave the way to achieving peaceful nuclear energy"

At some level, this is a compliment to the French. Being called a "superpower" :-)

But good for the Euros. Meeting next week to make sure the Russkis and Chinese stay on the reservation. What happens at the UNSC is anybodys guess (though my bet is that theyll take their time, and the first UNSC resolution wont even mention sanctions)
Posted by: liberalhawk   2006-01-12 11:52  

00:00