Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Drudge: Democrap Plan to "Destroy" Alito |
2006-01-07 |
"Flash" Report, so posted in full as link will die sooner or later. Senate Democrats have put into place a plan that includes one last push to take down the nomination of Judge Samuel A. Alito as he heads into his confirmation hearing next week, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned. ![]() Democrats hope to tie Alito to Concerned Alumni of Princeton (CAP). Alito will testify that he joined CAP as a protest over Princeton policy that would not allow the ROTC on campus. THE DRUDGE REPORT has obtained a Summer 1982 article from CAPâs PROSPECT magazine titled âSmearing The Class Of 1957â that key Senate Democrats believe could thwart his nomination! In the article written by then PROSPECT editor Frederick Foote, Foote writes: âThe facts show that, for whatever reasons, whites today are more intelligent than blacks.â Senate Democrats expect excerpts like this written by other Princeton graduates will be enough to torpedo the Alito nomination. One Democrat Hill staffer involved in their strategy declared, âPut a fork in Scalito. It doesnât matter that Alito didnât write it, it doesnât matter that Alito wasnât that active in the group, Foote wrote it in CAPâs magazine and we are going to make Alito own it.â However, a Republican insider contacted about the situation said, âItâs the dumbest thing Iâve ever heard. The reason CAP was formed was to protest against people like Drujack who think killing chickens is similar to what happened at Auschwitz. I donât understand how what a guy named Foote wrote in some magazine has anything to do with Alito.â The final witness on the Senate Democrats newly unveiled witness list for Alitoâs hearing is freelance journalist Stephen Dujack. Dujack is a â76 Princeton graduate and a longtime critic of CAP. Dujack was the author of a highly critical 1986 op-ed in the PRINCETON ALUMNI WEEKLY titled âThe Contradictions Of CAP.â Dujack slammed the group for its policies opposing Princeton's decision to admit women and minorities. Dujack now says: "Judge Alito will have to explain to the Senate Judiciary Committee why he paid dues to an outfit... that was overtly racist and sexist for its entire 14-year existence â at times passionately so, too." Dujack adds: "There is no way for Alito's backers to claim his association with the organization does not imply endorsement of its views, for opposition to women and minorities at Princeton was as central to CAP as opposition to drunken driving is to MADD." ![]() In the April 21, 2003 LOS ANGELES TIMES, Dujack wrote: âLike the victims of the Holocaust, animals are rounded up, trucked hundreds of miles to the kill floor and slaughtered.â Dujack went on, âTo those who defend the modern-day Holocaust on animals by saying that animals are slaughtered for food and give us sustenance, I ask: if the victims of the Holocaust had been eaten, would that have justified the abuse and murder?â THE DRUDGE REPORT has also uncovered a purported $2,000 donation Dujack made to John Kerryâs presidential campaign in 2004. Developing.... |
Posted by:.com |
#8 Got a blurb from Wisconsin Planned Parenthood whinnying about the terrible threat Alito poses. PPWI must be sending this to every woman in the state; I can't tell how else I would have gotten on their mailing list. Shall I count stridency in a mailing as a measure of panic? |
Posted by: mom 2006-01-07 22:18 |
#7 and even if Alito intended to change the direction of U.S. law, it would take multiple decades to achieve wow, that's a great sign, TW. It says to me that they intend to milk the issue, but that they are preparing their listeners for the fact it is a battle that they don't expect to win. |
Posted by: 2b 2006-01-07 21:06 |
#6 Last week one of the National Public Radio shows was all over the announcement by the non-partisan standing committee of lawyers to vet Supreme Court Justice candidates (sorry for that bit of linguistic awkwardness, but I am blanking on the actual name of this decades-old committee), which gave Alito its highest rating. So opponents to Alito cannot oppose him on any putative lack of professional ability (apparently he is a joy to argue cases in front of), and are stuck trying to argue that he would change the direction of the Court. However, in that same NPR program the reporter reminded listeners that the Supreme Court works very slowly, and even if Alito intended to change the direction of U.S. law, it would take multiple decades to achieve. Personally, it strikes me that legal conservatives are consideraby less likely to radically change things than so-called liberals, but it's quite possible that on this subject I don't actually know what I'm talking about. ;-) |
Posted by: trailing wife 2006-01-07 21:02 |
#5 Lets follow this logic.... Sen. Byrd is a Democrat Sen. Byrd once was (and some say still is) a member of the KKK. Conclusion: All democrats are current active members of the KKK and support its racist and antisemitic view fully. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2006-01-07 14:38 |
#4 Senator Kennedy's assertion that he doesn't recall anything after Mary Jo Kopechne forced herself upon him ...... |
Posted by: Frank G 2006-01-07 13:52 |
#3 Judge Alito's assertion that he cannot recall anything about his controversial involvement in CAP, requires us to find other ways of fulfilling our constitutional responsibility to get at the facts. Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-Ma) Kennedy Constitutional responsibility = name calling, loose associations, crass innuendo, tired clichés, spiteful insinuations, broad intimations, and demagoguery |
Posted by: DepotGuy 2006-01-07 13:45 |
#2 This plan already fell apart - go see Captain's Quarters... |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2006-01-07 09:43 |
#1 Senate Democrats intend to zero in on Alitoâs alleged enthusiastic membership to an organization, they will charge, that was sexist and racist! God damned Augusta National Country Club... |
Posted by: Martha Burk 2006-01-07 09:34 |