You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
The Nightmare That Won't Go Away
2005-11-28
November 27, 2005: Sunni Arabs are becoming increasingly nervous about their ability to remain in Iraq. To frequently paranoid Sunni Arabs, it's already beginning. In western Iraq, the attacks against terrorist strongholds, in Sunni Arab areas, continue. The military pressure has been constant on the terrorists for most of the year. The most recent attack force was smaller than earlier ones, with 400 U.S. marines and 150 Iraqi troops. But in addition to these joint operations, there has been increasing Iraqi police activity in the west. This also involves Iraqi army troops, and the latest version of the Iraqi secret police.

All this is being applied to Sunni Arabs who want to be back in power, with someone like Saddam Hussein (a ruthless Sunni Arab who knows how to take care of his own), back in charge. The current Iraqi security forces are dominated by Kurds and Shia Arabs (who represent 80 percent of the population.) The Iraqi security forces have evolved into a secret police. Most Westerners forget, or never knew, that every Arab nation has a secret police. Sort of a tradition, and a pretty nasty one. The secret police make up their own rules as they go along. All this business of constitutional protections and rule-of-law is alien to most Iraqis, as they have never experienced it. But most Iraqis have experienced loss at the hands of the Sunni Arab minority, want revenge, and are now eager to repay their tormenters in the same coin. Much to the chagrin of their American advisors, the Iraqi security troops are using "traditional methods" against the Sunni Arab population. This includes torture, arbitrary arrest, summary execution and holding people indefinitely without charge.

It's surreal to hear countries like Saudi Arabia, Russia and China complain about this, especially since most Iraqis are eager to stop the Sunni Arab terrorism any way they can. Saddam wasn't the only Iraqi to admire the way Russia and China maintain order (more lawless secret police and arbitrary use of law). To make matters worse, European media have a field day exposing this "American backed" work of the Iraqi security forces, and demand that the Sunni Arab minority be "protected" from the aggression of the "illegal" American occupation force and the "illegitimate" Iraqi government (which, while it represents the will of the Iraqi people, does not properly deal with the desires of the Sunni Arab minority.) If only those Americans would listen to the French, Germans and Russians, and bring back Sunni Arab domination. Not Saddam, but someone like him. And put American leaders on trial for committing the war crime of upsetting the status quo. Everyone's an expert when it comes to Iraq, but in the meantime, the situation is going to get worse.

The Iraqi government is organizing a force of 10,000 police and soldiers to launch a major attack on the terrorists (that is, the Sunni Arab population) before and after the December 15th parliamentary elections. The terrorists are playing into this by making more attacks on soft targets (hospitals, mosques and, last week a crowd of women and children receiving gifts of toys and candy from American soldiers.) The terrorists are slowly learning there's a difference between terrorizing a group, and just making them so angry that they will do great damage, perhaps even wipe out, their tormenters. To the Sunni Arab neighbors of Iraq, this has always been the ultimate nightmare. In the past, it never seemed possible that the Sunni Arab population would be driven from Iraq. But now, because of the Sunni Arab terrorism in Iraq, the "religious cleansing" of Iraq is becoming a possibility. For that reason, more and more Sunni Arab leaders, and even terrorist groups, are making peace with the government.

But this arrangement demands that the Sunni Arabs become active in fighting the terrorists. Many Sunni Arab leaders are reluctant to do this, for the terrorists have long gone after leaders who turn against them. Some are attacked or killed every month. However, while the terrorist groups may be reckless, many Sunni Arab leaders clearly see the patience of the Shia Arab majority growing shorter. Cleansing Iraq of Sunnis becomes more of a reality the longer the terrorists continue their attacks. You can see this happening already, as Sunni and Shia Arabs separate from villages and neighborhoods where they have long lived together, for safety from terrorist attack. Unfortunately, this makes it easier for Shia Arab and Kurdish secret police to surround exclusively Sunni Arab areas and move the population out of the country. This is a nightmare that many refuse to even acknowledge. But it's a common, if largely suppressed, part of Middle Eastern history. It's happened before, it can happen again.
Posted by:Steve

#12  An IRGC top Cdr. has just said today that Iran and the IRG will defeat America in Iraq and throughout the ME - IS IT JUST ME, OR DID IRAN = IRGC JUST GIVE YET ANOTHER INDICIA THAT IRAN IS WILFULLY INTERFERING IN IRAQ, AND THAT DUBYA, AGAIN, IS RIGHTEOUS TO TAKE MIL ACTION AGS IRAN!?
Once again, dem dar Iranyuhns are demanding to be attacked and invaded by Dubya.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2005-11-28 22:13  

#11  At long last; the voice of reason.
Posted by: AsymmTri   2005-11-28 21:10  

#10  message from Kurds and Shias to Sunnis:

"We're done playing - you either get with the program, which offers you better than you deserve, or we'll kill every last one of you bastards"
Posted by: Frank G   2005-11-28 20:13  

#9  Shia Arabs in Iran are already agitating to be free of the Shia Persians so it seems unlikely that Shia Arabs in Iraq would suddenly throw their own self-governing away.

I think the Shia Arabs amung Shia Persians in Iran and Shia Arabs amung Sunni Arabs in Saudi Arabia are more likely to wish to join Shia Iraq.

Seems Iran and Saudi Arabia has a lot more to worry about in that scenerio. Could explain why both nations are filling the ranks of guerrillas.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-11-28 18:04  

#8  Although could nean shia Islamic state from joining Iran?
Posted by: Obvious Phil   2005-11-28 17:13  

#7  .com is right on the money here. The Sunnis will fuck themselves right out of power in Iraq, already have for the most part.

We must secure the country before all else, and if that means wiping out the Sunni,well... they brought it on themselves and have noone to blame but themselves, and the Prhench and Germans for fucking up the original war plans that might have made life easier for Sunni arabs post Saddam!

But regardless, the Sunni are in a bad way and it ain't gonna get any better for them till the insurgency and terrorists are defeated.

EP
Posted by: ElvisHasLeftTheBuilding   2005-11-28 16:39  

#6  Let's apply a little common sense here...

"But this arrangement demands that the Sunni Arabs become active in fighting the terrorists."

This is dead right, Jim. It's their call. Thus far, they have either been active or passive allies / dupes for the terrs, hoping to stay out of the crosshairs but ready to inherit the mantle if the old order returns - trying to have it both ways, in other words.

No one can blame the Shi'a or the Kurds for their reaction to this reversal of fortune. To say otherwise is disingenuous. The Sunnis have fostered, whether actively or passively, the lawlessness that exists in Iraq, not to mention the bad blood generated by their brutality under Saddam. In the vacuum, the rise of vigilantes is absolutely natural - every man wants safety for his family, first and foremost. Additionally the payback factor certainly exists - also perfectly natural in their society as many Shi'a and Kurds have lost family to these dysfunctional murdering cretins for generations, and now from their terr "allies". They won't be changing the blood feud "rules" to suit anyone anytime soon. Fact.

In the end, it's obviously their choice. Note that you can't make them choose "correctly", either. So far, in every single case, they've chosen as badly as you would expect from a group as alien as if they came from Mars. Darwin 101 is in effect and social engineering will be just as ineffective here as it is everywhere else. Until the first requirement, safety, is met, all bets are off and the Sunnis are beginning to get exactly what they have clearly asked for - strategy be damned.
Posted by: .com   2005-11-28 14:11  

#5  This is not good news. Especially for the Kurds. Three factions is better than two when it comes to multicultural/ethnic government. Just ask Canada.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2005-11-28 13:46  

#4  Soryy, MoO, it is a bug. A key driver of our strategy is to incorporate significant Sunni into the new Iraq institutions. Iran is a huge threat, and for a 'reasonable' Iraqi government to survive there needs to be a 'critical mass' of viable opposition, which will HAVE to include a functioning Sunni component. We are trying to remove an advanced cancer from a vital organ without destroying the organ.
Posted by: Glenmore   2005-11-28 13:27  

#3  Who's got the popcorn?
Posted by: Jim   2005-11-28 13:15  

#2  sounds like a good idea too me :>
Posted by: Jerelet Thineling2988   2005-11-28 10:29  

#1  That's not a bug. It's a feature.
Posted by: Master of Obvious   2005-11-28 10:27  

00:00