You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Dems test new slogan
2005-10-25
House Democratic leaders are holding a closed-door meeting with members of their caucus this afternoon to discuss a new slogan for the 2006 midterm elections: "Together, We Can Do Better" or "Together, America Can Do Better," according to Democratic sources.
"Democrat's, America can do better"
Although aides say the slogan has yet to be finalized and is still up for debate, it has already been in frequent use by Democratic leaders on both sides of the Capitol for several weeks. House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) used it as early as Sept. 29, during a press conference on Hurricane Katrina relief, according to a search of an online news database. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) first used it in a similar Katrina press event Sept. 15.

Since then, it has become a common refrain in Democratic leadership statements, usually appearing at the end of Pelosi's press releases or sprinkled liberally in Reid's comments. Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) used it in the Democratic radio address on Saturday. Reid plastered it across the backdrop of an event held last week. The catchphrase is not new to political observers, who will remember that an earlier reincarnation, "America Can Do Better," was a slogan in the campaign of presidential aspirant Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), although his main theme was "A Stronger America."
It worked real well under his picture, don't ya think?

"America Can Do Better," which lacks the word "Together," has also been in frequent rotation this fall. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) used it on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct. 16. Rep. Rosa De Lauro (D-Conn.) incorporated it in her in Oct. 8 radio address, as did Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) in the Oct. 1 radio address.

Today's meeting will gather feedback from the broader caucus on the slogan, Democratic aides say, as part of a periodic effort to reach out to all members of Congress on message issues. Democrats plan to unveil their 2006 party platform in the coming weeks, much earlier than in previous cycles and way ahead of the GOP's 1994 "Contract With America," which came out six weeks before the election. Democratic leaders from an array of constituencies, including the House, Senate, Democratic National Committee, governors and mayors, have been working for months on a project designed to convey Democratic ideas and views to the public in a better way.

"There's this sense that people don't know where we stand or what our ideas are," a House Democratic leadership aide said. "Messaging has been the problem. 
 People should know where we stand. We've made our views clear on every issue that has come to the floor."
We know where you stand. We just don't agree with it
Academic George Lakoff, marketing expert Jack Trout and software entrepreneur John Cullinane have periodically weighed in on the project.

Democrats are also expected to discuss message issues beyond the overarching slogan, in an effort to address the widespread belief in Democratic circles that they need to communicate more effectively with voters. "We know the majority of people agree with us on the issues," a House Democratic aide said, "but this effort is an acknowledgment that we need to communicate better."
Same old, same old. They keep thinking they have the right message, we rubes just don't understand.
The message project considered "dozens" of potential slogans, many coming from members of Congress themselves, before making the tentative choice. The phrase is expected to act as an umbrella for a wide range of Democratic ideas.

Mike McCurry, who served as a spokesman for the Clinton White House, will lead the discussion at the meeting today. He made a similar presentation on the Senate side with former White House Chief of Staff John Podesta and former senior Clinton adviser Doug Sosnik several weeks ago. Jim Gerstein from Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research will present positive polling on the slogan. "They're going to be looking to get people's thoughts and foster a discussion" of conveying their message, the leadership aide said.

Similar slogans in past election cycles have also polled well but failed to win back either chamber for Democrats. Former House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.) had a two-word rubric: "Families First." Last cycle, Democrats did not have a catchall phrase, instead unveiling a set of six core principles in the New Partnership for America's Future.
Posted by:Steve

#28  Is this the golden ages club for big iron techies? (I'll admit to having had AD/Cycle partner on my biz cards at one point.)
Posted by: Classical_Liberal   2005-10-25 23:21  

#27  "America, we all agree it was a bad idea. Let's divvy up the money and split."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-10-25 22:54  

#26  IDMS was a pretty good product for its day. The relational hybrid POS was called IDMS/R (although when it first came out I recall it had a different name).
Posted by: phil_b   2005-10-25 21:22  

#25  phil_b - Heh, had to look it up - not my world. I spent only 1 year in the business / IBM world on a 360 doing COBOL - sucked, lol. I hauled ass back to the engineering world as fast as I could go - and back then you didn't change jobs more than once/yr without being "blacklisted" by the firms. I worked on CDC (all of 'em, heh), Cray-1, Dec & HP minis, IBM Series 1, Apple & IBM PC, Vax, Cray Y-MP, DOS & Win PCs. Only so many ways to split a buck, lol, and the second time was boring. Hell, I even had PC SW products on the pegboards at Mr Micro and Computerland, lol - sealed in plastic bags with a Daisy Seal-a-Meal, heh. Never played with Burroughs or Honeywell - my mother did that for DOD for about 15 yrs.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-25 20:48  

#24  lotp, you're my age. Do you recall the GE internal product, the General Electric Self Tape Actuated Processing Observer?
Posted by: Ununter Whoper4025   2005-10-25 19:41  

#23  For those techies who aren't .... in their mature years .... IDS was the product that Cullinane ripped off and did a lousy job with.
Posted by: lotp   2005-10-25 19:33  

#22  Bachman's IDS was a lovely product, tho. Used it in GCOS environments after GE sold their mainframe business to Honeywell and before Honeywell fubarred the whole thing up.
Posted by: lotp   2005-10-25 19:32  

#21  .com, I was referring to the IDMS + proprietary relational hybrid that was Cullinet's next generation flagship product that rightly bombed in the marketplace. I was one of the unfortunates who tried to use that dreadful POS.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-10-25 19:27  

#20  Together... Hmmm, so how many Americas are there in DhimmiThink? I'm just askin...

Indeed, America Can Do Better - as long as it laughs at these silly freaks.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-25 19:10  

#19   "Together, America Can Do Better"

Yikes! It's like a nice paintjob on a Volkswagen Bug and expecting it to beat Tony Stewart on the track. Ain't. Gonna. Happen.
Posted by: Raj   2005-10-25 19:03  

#18  "Together, America Can Do Better"

Well perhaps if you Democrats stopped being so divisive all the time. or, certainly you can do better, stop putting idiots up for election Democrats.

This campaign is too easy to mock. I can't wait.
Posted by: rjschwarz (no T!)   2005-10-25 18:19  

#17  anti-betty-crocker....oops
sorry, forgot to close the tag

/JM
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-25 18:12  

#16  because a slogan doesn't cover for social-welfare-anti-american-anti-strong militaruy CANDIDATES
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-25 18:11  

#15  So, why haven't the dems done better?

Same governmental model as the Soviets. Same policy model as the Soviets. Same corrupt party structure as the Soviets.

Gee, can't figure out why they haven't done better.
Posted by: Groluper Ebbelet5837   2005-10-25 18:10  

#14  So, why haven't the dems done better?
Posted by: anonymous2u   2005-10-25 17:59  

#13  Academic George Jakoff and company are the best gift possible for the Repubs. Keep it comin' boys, the polls show the donks are in even sorrier shape than to trunks.

Goofy slogans don't mean shit.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-10-25 17:59  

#12  But where are the giant puppets?

Slogan's worthless without giant puppets!!! Should be carried by Nancy Peolosi and her crowd.
Posted by: too true   2005-10-25 17:58  

#11  Any guesses what a Democrat victory-- especially Hillary in 2008-- would do to military recruitment and retention?
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-10-25 17:54  

#10  anyone who votes for a slogan should lose their right to vote
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-25 17:45  

#9  IDMS, lol. He certainly was a pluperfect putz. Now he's deified and people actually listen to his dinner speeches.

Mein Gott! It is 1968 1978 forever! Lol...
Posted by: .com   2005-10-25 17:37  

#8  And also on John Cullinane. The man who produced an poor, overly complex, rehash of others original ideas (the relational database) and then dismally failed to execute the concept.

You might find a metaphor for the Democratic party there.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-10-25 17:30  

#7  software entrepreneur John Cullinane

The man who burned hundreds of millions producing what in my informed opinion was the worst software product ever produced and gave away a market leading position to a small software company called Oracle.
Posted by: phil_b   2005-10-25 17:20  

#6  Vote Democrat...so it can be 1968 for the rest of time!
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-10-25 17:18  

#5  Democrats - lower poll numbers than their opponents, but still complaining.
Posted by: Bobby   2005-10-25 17:14  

#4  Democrats, when you really need to suck.

W. J. Cliton
Posted by: Tholurong Angereck4233   2005-10-25 17:12  

#3  The No There, There, Party.
Posted by: .com   2005-10-25 17:05  

#2  Workers of the world unite!
Posted by: macofromoc   2005-10-25 16:59  

#1  Democrats, America could suck even worse!
Posted by: mmurray821   2005-10-25 16:36  

00:00