You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Islamic charity’s copy of Quran calls for ‘race to jihad’
2005-10-17
ASHLAND — Pete Seda and his former Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation passed out copies of what the federal government considers to be a radical version of the Quran that includes a call to jihad, or holy war, against those who do not believe in Islam. The book, called "The Noble Quran," includes a chapter, called "Appendix 3," that tells readers to "race to jihad" and to include weapons such as missiles, planes and ships against the enemies of Allah.
The Religion of Peace™ at its finest...
Tom Nelson, the Portland attorney licensed as the Al-Haramain agent here, acknowledged the appendix’s presence Saturday, saying that he believes government misinterprets it and uses it to paint the group as terrorists. "That’s the one that’s driving people nuts," Nelson said.
Gee, why would that be?
Nelson said he believes Seda and Soliman Al-Buthe, his Saudi Arabian partner in Al-Haramain, chose the version because it was a good translation of the Quran and not because of the addition of the appendix.
"No, no! Certainly not!"
Nelson, who is Al-Buthe’s lawyer, said the pair did not stress reading or applying the messages from "Appendix 3." This version of the Quran was printed before the Sept. 11 attacks, when jihad did not have the same holy war connotations as today, Nelson said.
Then what were they doing September 11th, Tom?
"I can see how Americans can be upset about it after 9/11," Nelson said. "I don’t think they would have pre-9/11."
That's because most of us weren't paying attention before 9/11. Now that we're paying attention, we're noticing all sorts of interesting items about the 'Religion of Peace' (PTUI).
Despite the appendix’s many references to violence and war, Nelson prefers to consider jihad as a "struggle" and that Islam teaches that "death is better than oppression."
And that beheading your enemies is best of all.
"A call to jihad means (something) completely different to a Westerner than an Easterner," said Nelson, who is a practicing Muslim.
"We'd like to keep it that way, of course..."
"There are all kinds of jihads," he said. "It can be a violent struggle. It can be a non-violent struggle."
"It can involve knives or guns or dynamite or hijacked aircraft. It's all very subtle..."
And beheading your enemies is best of all.
Nelson said parts of the appendix are "somebody’s opinion of what the Quran said," though it has become a focal point for making Muslims "appear as disparaging individuals," Nelson said.
Could it be that it's because "somebody's" in the habit of issuing fatwahs and "spiritual guidance" to the rubes, who then rush off to kill infidels?
"Frankly, I think everybody wishes ‘Appendix 3’ was never written," Nelson said. "I wish it hadn’t happened," he said. "I wish it wasn’t there. But it is."
Maybe you should consider becoming a Unitarian, Tom. And Pete and Soliman and all their accomplices might, as well. Somehow, the thought of militant Unitarianism doesn't scare me.
Unequivocal denunciation of violence in 5 .. 4 .. 3 .. .. .. 4 .. 5 .. 6 ...
Posted by:anonymous5089

#4  "Frankly, I think everybody wishes ‘Appendix 3’ was never written," Nelson said. "I wish it hadn’t happened," he said. "I wish it wasn’t there. But it is."

So rip it out and burn it. What's the freakin' problem here, people?
Posted by: mojo   2005-10-17 14:27  

#3  "...I wish it wasn’t there. But it is."

Actually I wish the dozens and dozens of 'kill your enemy', 'subdue the infidel', etc. verses weren't in the Koran; but they are.
Posted by: mhw   2005-10-17 13:17  

#2  Hookay, now freeze the entire organization's assets, including capital equipment and buildings until they distribute an equal number of tracts, sermons, flyers, whatever that contain corrected passages unequivocally renouncing violent jihad. They can go out and collect new contributions which must be strictly delegated towards this end and no other, under federal monitoring. Once they have complied, their assets can be thawed. After microscopic scrutiny and auditing, of course.
Posted by: Zenster   2005-10-17 12:08  

#1  Hookay, now freeze the entire organization's assets, including capital equipment and buildings until they distribute an equal number of tracts, sermons, flyers, whatever that contain corrected passages unequivocally renouncing violent jihad. They can go out and collect new contributions which must be strictly delegated towards this end and no other, under federal monitoring. Once they have complied, their assets can be thawed. After microscopic scrutiny and auditing, of course.
Posted by: Zenster   2005-10-17 12:06  

00:00