You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Bolton: U.N. Council Expansion Will Fail
2005-10-15
LONDON (AP) - John Bolton, America's ambassador to the United Nations, predicted Friday that efforts to greatly expand the Security Council will fail.

Bolton's remarks were a rare case of a U.S. official publicly pimp-slapping speculating on the outcome of a bitter Security Council reform debate. In the past, he and other officials have repeated strong American opposition to rival proposals for adding at least 10 seats to the 15-nation body.

Bolton, who has made overhauling the United Nations a priority since President Bush appointed him to the job, said the world body must become more efficient, effective and accountable. Making the Security Council too large would undermine that goal, he said.
Increasing the number of seats to 25 or 26 "gives us great pause," he said, adding that the maximum that Washington could support would be 19 or 20 seats.
'bout time for the League of Democracies, isn't it?
U.S. opposition is a key factor because there is no consensus among the 191 U.N. member states on how to expand the council. Also, while the United States does not have the power to block a vote in the General Assembly, where there are no vetoes, its support would be crucial when necessary changes to the U.N. Charter would have to be approved by national legislatures.

Giving his first talk in Europe since taking his post in August, Bolton noted previous efforts to restructure the powerful Security Council had foundered. "Our prediction would be that this latest effort at changing the composition of the council is not going to succeed," he said at the Chatham House foreign affairs think tank.

He reiterated the U.S. administration's support for Japan's bid to become a permanent member of the council, but did not say what other countries America might back. Japan teamed with Brazil, Germany and India in proposing a 25-member council, including six new permanent seats without veto power. All four hope to get a permanent seat and say the two others should go to Africa nations. The African Union, however, has insisted on veto power for its two seats and one additional non-permanent seat.

Another group, led by Italy and Pakistan, also calls for a 25-nation council but argues against making any of the new seats permanent and wants the 10 new members elected.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  "U.S. opposition is a key factor because there is no consensus among the 191 U.N. member states on how to expand the council."

And there never will be consensus among those diametrically opposed to democracy. They will never relinquish their self-imposed power and corrupt money for -gasp- accountability and freedom for the peons. A League of Democracies is past due.
Posted by: Danielle   2005-10-15 10:50  

#2  China sez NO, the US sez NO. It is not going to happen. This is just some Eurowanking and TRANZI BS. He is telling the EU, get over it, You still don't count.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2005-10-15 01:24  

#1  ...the powerful Security Council....

Now that's a good one, Dr. Steve! I can see it now. The UN will increase the seats to 25 just to stick it to the US. Then the UNSC will be over critical mass and will accelerate the decline of the body. What could a body of 25 really do except consume food, drink, and oxygen and generate greenhouse gases and methane?

I'm glad Bolton is UN ambassador. He will keep them a-buzzing, and that is a source of merriment.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-10-15 00:12  

00:00