You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Woman killed at W Bank checkpoint
2005-10-04
A Palestinian woman has been shot dead by Israeli troops at a military checkpoint in the northern West Bank after she stabbed a female soldier. The army said the woman took out a knife and attacked the soldier, lightly wounding her in the face. Other soldiers shot the attacker in the legs, the army said. Both women were treated at the scene, but the Palestinian later died.
This is what happens when you bring a knife to a gunfight
The incident was at Hawara near Nablus, scene of many attacks in the past.

Relatives identified the Palestinian woman as 30-year-old mother-of-five Haifa Hindiya. No militant group has claimed responsibility for the attack. She received treatment from Red Crescent medics at the scene, Palestinian witnesses said.
Which explains why she died

The Israeli army said the woman was knocked to the ground after lunging at a soldier with a knife, and was shot dead when she tried to get up again and attack a second time.
"We told you.....BANG!....stay down!"
A Palestinian witness quoted by Reuters said troops hit the woman several times with their weapons as she was on the ground. "She tried to stand up immediately. Two soldiers then opened fire at her and killed her," the witness said.
Well....duh!
Israel is stepping up security to prevent possible Palestinian militant attacks during Jewish new year celebrations.
Israeli troops also barred Palestinians from entering Israel from the West Bank and Gaza during the holiday, which coincides this year with the first day of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

On Friday, Israeli troops shot dead a Palestinian teenager in the Askar refugee camp near Nablus. The army has opened an inquiry into the killing, which happened when troops opened fire at unarmed youths throwing stones as they were on patrol in the camp.
SEE: Don't bring rocks to gunfight
Posted by:Steve

#12  "unarmed youths throwing stones"

I'd suggest the moron who wrote this should stand still for five minutes while those "unarmed" youths throw those stones at him (her?).

If he survives, maybe I'll accept his description. Until then, he can FOAD.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-10-04 18:11  

#11  accurate "head shots" is the better response.
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-04 16:20  

#10  "Stones" actually is stones thrown with a sling quite often. Paleos are good with this lethal weapon. You can hunt with them and also be killed by one. It's a aggressive act to "throw stones" shooting back is a valid response.
Posted by: Sock Puppet O´ Doom   2005-10-04 16:05  

#9  EVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVvvvvvvvvvvrybody must get stoned...

--Bob Dylan
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-10-04 15:49  

#8  Wanna stop these problems? Rock Buyback Program. That and maybe Midnight Basketball.
Posted by: tu3031   2005-10-04 15:21  

#7  Sounds like an EU approach, Mucky!
Posted by: Darrell   2005-10-04 15:16  

#6  why aint they jus ban stones an end teh problem?
Posted by: muck4doo   2005-10-04 15:12  

#5  Isn't "stoning" one of the main ways the Koran cites for carrying out capital punishment? And didn't David kill Goliath with a stone? So why wouldn't it be ok to shoot back at stone throwers?
Posted by: Glenmore   2005-10-04 13:30  

#4  I nominate "the paleo people" for an honorary Darwin Award, for their continuing efforts to spread a little chlorine in the gene pool
Posted by: Frank G   2005-10-04 13:00  

#3  Sometimes the 'stones' the kiddies are throwing are actually cinderblocks and busted-up masonry 'stones.' Not exactly pebbles, if you get my drift...
Posted by: Seafarious   2005-10-04 12:37  

#2  "unarmed youths throwing stones"

Is that stone part of your body? N-O, that makes you armed. Why do these idiots refuse to believe you can kill with stones?
Posted by: flash91   2005-10-04 11:59  

#1  "... opened fire at unarmed youths throwing stones ..."
Maybe it's a judgement call, but I consider someone throwing stones to be armed. Certainly not in the same class as armed with a gun, but armed, nonetheless.
Posted by: Xbalanke   2005-10-04 11:48  

00:00