You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Ground Zero 'freedom center' quashed
2005-09-29
NEW YORK (CNN) -- A controversial proposal for an International Freedom Center adjacent to the planned memorial at the World Trade Center site has been abandoned.

New York Gov. George Pataki on Wednesday announced the change of plans he once championed. "There remains too much opposition, too much controversy over the programming of the IFC and we must move forward with our first priority -- the creation of an inspiring memorial to pay tribute to our lost loved ones and tell their stories to the world," Pataki said in a written statement.

A growing chorus of September 11 victims' family members had objected to proposed exhibits that would cover subjects in American history unrelated to the 2001 terrorists attack. Some also objected to the center occupying an eight-story cultural center in the southwest quadrant of the 16-acre site where the memorial will be centered. "Therefore, the IFC cannot be located on the memorial quadrant," Pataki said.

Pataki said he wanted the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, the city-state agency overseeing rebuilding on the site, to explore other locations for the center. But the center immediately issued a statement saying it did not see "a viable alternative place." "We consider our work, therefore, to have been brought to an end," said the center's chief operating officer, Richard Tofel.
Oh. Darn. Shoot. Drat. Fudge.
Hundreds of September 11 families protested the plan in recent weeks, staging demonstrations at Ground Zero to "take back the memorial" and circulating petitions. They contended the freedom center would detract from the necessary, singular focus on the terrorist attacks that toppled the Twin Towers and claimed 2,749 lives in Lower Manhattan.

Debra Burlingame, a World Trade Center Memorial Foundation board member whose brother was a pilot on the plane that al Qaeda hijackers crashed into the Pentagon on the same day, helped lead the protests and applauded the decision. "The terrorists who killed our loved ones are the ones who turned it into a cemetery. We want to turn it into a incredible memorial," Burlingame said. "That story will be a story of loss and inspiration. Now it will be undiluted without distraction."

Pataki and freedom center supporters had argued that al Qaeda attacked the United States because of its freedoms of religion and speech, its tradition of democracy and support for human rights. "The celebration of freedom is not inconsistent with the goals of memorializing our nearly 3,000 lost heroes," Pataki said. "The creation of an institution that would show the world our unity and our resolve to preserve freedom in the wake of the horrific attacks is a noble pursuit.

"But freedom should unify us. This center has not," he said.
Because in the end it was all about the freedom to blame us for our freedom.

The rest of the article has the usual reactions.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  Exactly, remoteman. Through Michelle Malkin's site, I learned about the plan for the PA memorial and wrote a protest letter. From there I learned about and signed the NYC 9/11 survivors' petition on the use of Ground Zero and forwarded the petition on to dozens of friends to sign, too-friends of all political stripes. We ain't gonna let a memorial to 9/11 be an arena for diminishing America. Find someplace else for that.
Posted by: jules 2   2005-09-29 23:08  

#6  THis would never have happened without the blogosphere. Ten years ago this thing would have been built and none of us would have known a thing about it until it was done. The left just can't get away with their crap anymore. We need to keep up the pressure on them, on all fronts. This is just the first victory of many to come.
Posted by: remoteman   2005-09-29 14:43  

#5  "There remains too much opposition, too much controversy over the programming of the IFC and we must move forward with our first priority -- the creation of an inspiring memorial to pay tribute to our lost loved ones and tell their stories to the world,"

I applaud Pataki for making the right decision, but his reason is so mealy-mouthed and wishy-washy as to be worhty only of a sleazy politician. How about opposing it on its lack of merits?
Posted by: Xbalanke   2005-09-29 12:32  

#4  Move the damn IFC to Governor's Island near Ellis Island. Run the tour boats so the vistors get to see both the tribute to the Great Immigration and then their American Indian Holocaust display in the IFC. Perspective. Message - history is not clean. There is often no perfect in real history. Way too often it is a choice between lesser of two evils [like supplying Stalin against Hitler]. However, we all know the IFC was declared by its backers as an all or nothing for Ground Zero, so it will die the ugly death it deserves.
Posted by: Spirong Phavinter9038   2005-09-29 09:51  

#3  Sanity wins for once. Bravo, NY.
Posted by: Chris W.   2005-09-29 09:32  

#2  Cindy Sheehan's next protest target in 5... 4... 3...
Posted by: Raj   2005-09-29 09:25  

#1  Close down the pity party tent, the moonbat carnival has skipped town.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-09-29 01:04  

00:00