| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Were soldiers held as hostages to be traded? |
| 2005-09-21 |
| Posted by:Groluns Snoluter6338 |
| #4 Our problem is that we allow our policies to be emasculated by the idiot denizens of the State Department (or Foreign Office for Brits) and the fear of being ranted at by the left. Each incident of Iranian shenanigans should be answered with a stealth bomb run over Tehran targeting leadership. That is how the game ought to be played. |
| Posted by: VRWconspiracy 2005-09-21 18:21 |
| #3 "Intelligence sources say the tit-for-tat capture of two British Special Reconnaissance Regiment soldiers on Monday..." By the way...what is "tat"...and how can I trade it for the other thing. |
| Posted by: DepotGuy 2005-09-21 11:09 |
| #2 British officers say a good analogy in UK terms would be handing responsibility for the maintenance of law and order in Belfast to the Provisional IRA. I see things will have to change in Basra.. God the beeb have wanked themselves nigh unconscious over this.. |
| Posted by: Howard UK 2005-09-21 09:03 |
| #1 If you mash the Tater, what happens to the Tots? |
| Posted by: Hupereting Sputing8806 2005-09-21 08:06 |